Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Animal Migration

Ed. by Davis, Andrew

1 Issue per year


Emerging Science

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2084-8838
See all formats and pricing

Variation in Forewing Size Linked to Migratory Status in Monarch Butterflies

Yiwen Li
  • Corresponding author
  • Emory University, USA
/ Amanda A Pierce
  • Corresponding author
  • Emory University, Department of Biology
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Biology
/ Jacobus C. de Roode
  • Corresponding author
  • Emory University, Department of Biology
Published Online: 2016-06-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ami-2016-0003

Abstract

Long-distance migration can be seen throughout the animal kingdom and can have large impacts on population dynamics and species distributions. The act of migration itself also affects the evolution of a species, as evolutionary forces select for certain characteristics in animals conducting long-distance migration. Monarch butterflies are best known for their annual migration from Canada and the northern United States to central Mexico, but some populations of monarchs have lost the ability to migrate. Previous research found that migratory monarchs had larger, more elongated wings than their non-migratory counterparts and it was hypothesized that these traits were beneficial for migration. However, Bergmann’s rule - which predicts larger body sizes with increasing latitude - could also explain this pattern as migratory populations are found at higher latitudes. To understand the role of wing dimensions in migration, we examined forewing size and shape of migratory and non-migratory monarchs from seven worldwide populations varying in latitude. Results showed that larger forewing size was indeed correlated with migratory status rather than latitude. However, migratory monarchs did not have more elongated forewing shape than non-migratory monarchs across the globe. Our study indicates that size may play a larger role than shape in long-distance migratory capability.

Keywords : long-distance migration; Danaus plexippus; wing morphology; Bergmann’s rule

References

  • [1] McKinnon L., Smith P.A., Nol E., Martin J.L., Doyle F.I., Abraham K.F., et al., Lower Predation Risk for Migratory Birds at High Latitudes. Science, 2010, 327, 326-7 [Web of Science]

  • [2] Altizer S., Bartel R., and Han B.A., Animal migration and infectious disease risk, Science, 2011, 331, 296-302 [Web of Science]

  • [3] Dingle H., Migration strategies of insects, Science, 1972, 175, 1327-1355

  • [4] Alerstam T., Conflicting evidence about long-distance animal navigation, Science, 2006, 313, 791-4

  • [5] Alerstam T., Hedenstrom A., and Akesson S., Long-distance migration: evolution and determinants, Oikos, 2003, 103, 247-60

  • [6] Dingle H., Migration: The Biology of Life on the Move, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996

  • [7] Skov C., Chapman B.B., Boktoft H., Brodersen J., Bronmark C., Hansson L.A., et al., Migration confers survival benefits against avian predators for partially migratory freshwater fish, Biol. Lett., 2013, 9, 20121178 [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • [8] Liedvogel M., Akesson S., and Bensch S., The genetics of migration on the move, Trends Ecol. Evol., 2011, 26, 561-569

  • [9] Slatkin M., Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations, Science, 1987, 236, 787-792

  • [10] Johst K., and Brandl R., The effect of dispersal on local population dynamics, Ecol. Modell., 1997,104, 87-101 [Crossref]

  • [11] Birand, A., Vose A., and Gavrilets S., Patterns of species ranges, speciation, and extinction, Am. Nat., 2012, 179, 1-21 [Web of Science]

  • [12] Alonso-Mejia A., Rendon Salinas E., Montesinos-Patino E., and Brower L. P., Use of lipid reserves by monarch butterflies overwintering in Mexico: Implications for conservation, Ecol. Appl., 1997,7,934-947 [Crossref]

  • [13] Brower L. P., Fink L. S., and Walford P., Fueling the fall migration of the Monarch butterfly, Integr. and Comp. Biol., 2006, 46, 1123-1142

  • [14] Suarez-Tovar C.M., and Sarmiento C.E., Beyond the wing planform: morphological differentiation between migratory and nonmigratory dragonfly species, J. Evol. Bio., 2016, 29, 690-703 [Web of Science]

  • [15] Urquhart F.A., and Urquhart N.R., Autumnal migration routes of the eastern population of the monarch butterfly (Danaus p. plexippus L.; Danaidae; Lepidoptera) in North America to the overwintering site in the Neovolcanic Plateau of Mexico, Can. J. of Zool. 1978, 56, 1759-64

  • [16] Tuskes P. M., and Brower L. P., Overwintering ecology of monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus, in California, Ecol. Entomol., 1978, 3, 141-153 [Crossref]

  • [17] Miller N. G., Wassenaar L. I., Hobson K. A., and Norris D. R., Migratory Connectivity of the Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus): Patterns of Spring Re-Colonization in Eastern North America, PLoS ONE, 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0031891 [Crossref]

  • [18] Pierce A. A., Zalucki M. P., Bangura M., Udawatta M., Kronforst M. R., Altizer S., et al., Serial founder effects and genetic differentiation during worldwide range expansion of [Web of Science]

  • [monarch butterflies, Proc. R. Soc. B, Biol, 2014, 281

  • [19] Zhan S., Zhang W., Niitepold K., Hsu J., Haeger J. F., Zalucki M. P., et al., The genetics of monarch butterfly migration and warning colouration, Nature, 2014, 514, 317-321 [Web of Science]

  • [20] Pierce A., Altizer S., Chamberlain N., Kronforst M., and de Roode J., Monarchs in a Changing World: Biology and Conservation of an Iconic Butterfly, Cornell University Press, New York, 2015

  • [21] Hahn S., Korner-Nievergelt F., Emmenegger T., Amrhein V., Csoergo T., Gursoy A., et al, Longer wings for faster springs - wing length relates to spring phenology in a long-distance migrant across its range, Ecol & Evol, 2016, 6, 68-77

  • [22] Hassall C., Keat S., Thompson D.J., and Watts P.C., Bergmann’s rule is maintained during a rapid range expansion in a damselfly, Glob. Change Biol., 2014,20, 475-82 [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • [23] Bergmann C., Ueber die Verhaeltnisse der Waermeoekonomie der Thiere zu ihrer

  • [Groesse, Goettinger Studien, 1847, 1, 595-708, (in German)

  • [24] Ray C. , The application of Bergmann’s and Allen’s rules to the poikilotherms. J. Morphol., 1960, 106, 85-108

  • [25] Lonsdale D.J., and Levinton J.S., Latitudinal differentiation in copepod growth- an adaptation to temperature, Ecol., 1985, 66, 1397-407

  • [26] Berven K.A., The genetic-basis of altitudinal variation in the wood from Rana sylvatica I. An experimental analysis of life-history traits, Evol., 1982, 36, 962-83

  • [27] Yang L. H., Ostrovsky D., Rogers M. C., and Welker J. M., Intrapopulation variation in the natal origins and wing morphology of overwintering western monarch butterflies Danaus plexippus, Ecograph., 2015 [Crossref]

  • [28] Brower L. P., Understanding and misunderstanding the migration of the monarch butterfly (Nymphalidae) in North America: 1857-1995, J. Lepid. Soc., 1995, 49, 304-385

  • [29] Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B.M., and Walker S.C., Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4, J. Stat. Softw., 2015, 67, 1-48

  • [30] Harrell Jr F. E., and with contributions from Charles Dupont and many others, HMisc: Harrell miscellaneous, R package version 3.14-6, 2014, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Hmisc

  • [31] R Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2014, http://www.R-project.org/

  • [32] Altizer S., and Davis A. K., Populations of monarch butterflies with different migratory behaviors show divergence in wing morphology, Evol., 2010, 64, 1018-1028

  • [33] Dockx C., Directional and stabilizing selection on wing size and shape in migrant and resident monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus (L.), in Cuba, Biol. J. Linnean Soc., 2007, 92, 605-616 [Web of Science]

  • [34] Reppert S. M., Gegear R. J., and Merlin C., Navigational mechanisms of migrating [Web of Science]

  • [monarch butterflies, Trends Neuros., 2010, 33, 399-406

  • [35] Calmaestra R.G., and Moreno E., A phylogenetically-based analysis on the relationship between wing morphology and migratory behaviour in passeriformes, Ardea, 2001,89, 407-16

  • [36] Johansson F., Soderquist M., and Bokma F., Insect wing shape evolution: independent effects of migratory and mate guarding flight on dragonfly wings, Biol. J. Linnean Soc, 2009, 97, 362-372 [Web of Science]

  • [37] Pennycuick C.J., Modelling the Flying Bird, Theoretical Ecology Series, 2008

  • [38] Betts C. R., and Wootton R. J., Wing shape and flight behavior in butterflies (lepidoptera: Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea): a preliminary analysis, J. Exp. Biol., 1988, 138, 271-2888

  • [39] Cespedes A., Penz C.M., and DeVries P.J., Cruising the rain forest floor: butterfly wing shape evolution and gliding in ground effect, J. Ani. Ecol., 2015, 84,808-16 [Web of Science]

  • [40] Dudley R., The biomechanics of insect flight: Form, function, evolution, Princeton University Press, New Jersy, 2000

  • [41] Gibo D.L., and Pallett M.J., Soaring flight of monarch butterflies Danaus plexippus (Lepitoptera, Danaidae) during the late summer migration in Southern Ontario Canada, Can. J. Zool., 1979, 57,1391-401

  • [42] Urquhart F.A., The Monarch butterfly, University of Toronto Press, Toronto,

  • [ 1960

  • [43] Satterfield D., and Davis A., Variation in wing characteristics of monarch butterflies

  • [during migration: Earlier migrants have redder and more elongated wings, Anim. Migr., 2014

  • [44] Dockx C., Differences in phenotypic traits and migratory strategies between eastern North American monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus (L.), Biol. J. Linnean Soc, 2012, 106, 717-736 [Web of Science]

About the article

Received: 2016-04-12

Accepted: 2016-06-13

Published Online: 2016-06-23


Citation Information: Animal Migration, ISSN (Online) 2084-8838, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ami-2016-0003. Export Citation

© 2016 Yiwen Li, et al.. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in