Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

American Mineralogist

Journal of Earth and Planetary Materials

Ed. by Baker, Don / Xu, Hongwu / Swainson, Ian

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 2.645

CiteScore 2017: 2.31

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 1.440
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.059

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 100, Issue 8-9


Accurate determination of Fe3+/ΣFe of andesitic glass by Mössbauer spectroscopy

Hongluo L. Zhang / Peat A. Solheid / Rebecca A. Lange
  • Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, U.S.A.
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Anette von der Handt / Marc M. Hirschmann
Published Online: 2015-08-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2015-5161


To evaluate the accuracy of Fe3+ and Fe2+ ratios in silicate glasses determined by Mössbauer spectroscopy, we examine in detail the temperature (47-293 K) of Mössbauer spectra for two andesitic glasses, one quenched at 1 atm, 1400 °C (VF3) and the other at 3.5 GPa, 1600 °C (M544). Variabletemperature Mössbauer spectra of these two glasses are used to characterize the recoilless fraction, f, by two different methods-a relative method (RM) based on the temperature dependence of the ratios of Fe3+ and Fe2+ Mössbauer doublets and the second based on the temperature dependence of the center shift (CS) of the doublets. The ratio of the recoilless fractions for Fe3+ and Fe2+, CT, can then be used to adjust the observed area of the Mössbauer doublets into the Fe3+/∑Fe ratio in the sample. We also evaluated the contributions of non-paramagnetic components to the Fe in the glasses by determining the influence of applied magnetic field on sample magnetization. Finally, for the VF3 glass, we determined the Fe3+/∑Fe independently by wet chemical determination of the FeO content combined with careful electron microprobe analyses of total Fe. Recoilless fractions determined with the CS method (CSM) are significantly smaller than those determined with the relative method and suggest larger corrections to room-temperature Fe3+/∑Fe ratios. However, the RM determinations are believed to be more accurate because they depend less on the assumption of the Debye harmonic model and because they produce more nearly temperature-independent estimates of Fe3+/∑Fe ratios. Non-linear responses of sample magnetizations to applied magnetic fields indicate that the glasses contain a small (0.4-1.1% for VF3) superparamagnetic component that is most likely to be nanophase precipitates of (Fe,Mg)Fe2O4 oxide, but corrections for this component have negligible influence on the total Fe3+/∑Fe determined for the glass. For the VF3 glass, the Fe3+/∑Fe produced by uncorrected room-temperature Mössbauer spectroscopy [0.685 ± 0.014 in two standard deviation (2σ)] agrees within 3% of that determined by wet chemistry (0.666 ± 0.030 in 2σ). The Fe3+/∑Fe corrected for recoilless fraction contributions is 0.634 ± 0.078(2σ), which is 7.5% lower than the uncorrected room-temperature ratio, but also agrees within 5% of wet chemical ratio. At least for this andesitic glass, the room-temperature determination of Fe3+/∑Fe is accurate within analytical uncertainty, but room-temperature Mössbauer determinations of Fe3+/∑Fe are always systematically higher compared to recoilless-fraction corrected ratios.

Keywords: Mössbauer spectroscopy; silicate glass; recoilless fraction; Fe3+/∑Fe

About the article

Received: 2014-08-13

Accepted: 2015-03-18

Published Online: 2015-08-12

Published in Print: 2015-08-01

Citation Information: American Mineralogist, Volume 100, Issue 8-9, Pages 1967–1977, ISSN (Online) 1945-3027, ISSN (Print) 0003-004X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2015-5161.

Export Citation

© 2015 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in