Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

American Mineralogist

Journal of Earth and Planetary Materials

Ed. by Baker, Don / Xu, Hongwu / Swainson, Ian


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 2.645

CiteScore 2017: 2.31

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 1.440
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.059

Online
ISSN
1945-3027
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 100, Issue 8-9

Issues

Data, ideas, and the nature of scientific progress

Keith Putirka
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, California State University, Fresno, 2576 East San Ramon Avenue, M/S ST24, Fresno, California 93740, U.S.A.
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-08-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2015-ed1008-94

Abstract

Scientists sometimes have the idea that “data are eternal,” i.e., that our scientific observations long outlive our hypotheses and ideas based on such. In this Editorial, we make use of work by science historians Chang (2004), Danielson and Graney (2014) and others, to show that data have a limited period of usefulness-a date of expiration so to speak. Beyond that date (probably mostly unknown beforehand), data either are (1) no longer of interest, because the problems that motivated their collection are resolved or no longer of concern, or (2) because new technologies render them obsolete. Scientific progress in any era is thus defined as the art of making observations that are “good enough”-so as to develop the “middle-level” and other theories, which as discussed by Chang (2004), appear to have lasting value.

Keywords: History; philosophy; history of science; philosophy of science

About the article

Published Online: 2015-08-12

Published in Print: 2015-08-01


Citation Information: American Mineralogist, Volume 100, Issue 8-9, Pages 1657–1658, ISSN (Online) 1945-3027, ISSN (Print) 0003-004X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2015-ed1008-94.

Export Citation

© 2015 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in