Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Advances in Nonlinear Analysis

Editor-in-Chief: Radulescu, Vicentiu / Squassina, Marco

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 6.636

CiteScore 2018: 5.03

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 3.215
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 3.225

Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2017: 1.89

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Global existence of a radiative Euler system coupled to an electromagnetic field

Xavier Blanc
  • Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions, UMR 7598, UPMC, CNRS, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75205 Paris, France
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Bernard Ducomet
  • Université Paris-Est, LAMA (UMR 8050), UPEMLV, UPEC, CNRS, 61 avenue du Général de Gaulle, 94010 Créteil Cedex 10 Paris, France
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Šárka Nečasová
  • Corresponding author
  • Institute of Mathematics of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Žitná 25, 11567 Praha 1, Czech Republic
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-03-21 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/anona-2017-0117


We study the Cauchy problem for a system of equations corresponding to a singular limit of radiative hydrodynamics, namely, the 3D radiative compressible Euler system coupled to an electromagnetic field. Assuming smallness hypotheses for the data, we prove that the problem admits a unique global smooth solution and study its asymptotics.

Keywords: Compressible; Euler; radiation hydrodynamics

MSC 2010: 35Q30; 76N10

1 Introduction

In [3], after the studies of Lowrie, Morel and Hittinger [15], and Buet and Després [5], we considered a singular limit for a compressible inviscid radiative flow, where the motion of the fluid is given by the Euler system for the evolution of the density ϱ=ϱ(t,x), the velocity field u=u(t,x) and the absolute temperature ϑ=ϑ(t,x), and where radiation is described in the limit by an extra temperature Tr=Tr(t,x). All of these quantities are functions of the time t and the Eulerian spatial coordinate x3.

In [3] we proved that the associated Cauchy problem admits a unique global smooth solution, provided that the data are small enough perturbations of a constant state.

In [4] we coupled the previous model to the electromagnetic field through the so-called magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) approximation, in presence of thermal and radiative dissipation. Hereafter, we consider the perfect non-isentropic Euler–Maxwell system and we also consider a radiative coupling through a pure convective transport equation for the radiation (without dissipation). Then we deal with a pure hyperbolic system with partial relaxation (damping on velocity).

More specifically the system of equations to be studied for the unknowns (ϱ,u,ϑ,Er,B,E) reads



where ϱ is the density, u the velocity, ϑ the temperature of matter, E=12|u|2+e(ϱ,ϑ) is the total mechanical energy, Er is the radiative energy related to the temperature of radiation Tr by Er=aTr4, and pr is the radiative pressure given by pr=13aTr4=13Er, with a>0. Finally, E is the electric field and B is the magnetic induction.

We assume that the pressure p(ϱ,ϑ) and the internal energy e(ϱ,ϑ) are positive smooth functions of their arguments, with


and we also suppose for simplicity that ν=1τ (where τ>0 is a momentum-relaxation time) and μ,σa and a are positive constants.

A simplification appears if one observes that, provided that equations (1.7) and (1.8) are satisfied at t=0, they are satisfied for any time t>0, and consequently they can be discarded from the analysis below.

Notice that the reduced system (1.1)–(1.4) is the non-equilibrium regime of radiation hydrodynamics, introduced by Lowrie, Morel and Hittinger [15] and, more recently, by Buet and Després [5], and studied mathematically by Blanc, Ducomet and Nečasová [3]. Extending this last analysis, our goal in this work is to prove global existence of solutions for system (1.1)–(1.8) when the data are sufficiently close to an equilibrium state, and study their large time behavior.

For the sake of completeness, we mention that related non-isentropic Euler–Maxwell systems have been the subject of a number of studies in the recent past. Let us quote the recent works [9, 10, 12, 14, 18, 21].

In the following, we show that the ideas used by Ueda, Wang and Kawashima in [20, 19] in the isentropic case can be extended to the (radiative) non-isentropic system (1.1)–(1.6). To this end, we follow the following plan. In Section 2 we present the main results and then, in Section 3, we prove the well-posedness of system (1.1)–(1.6). Finally, in Section 4, we prove the large time asymptotics of the solution.

2 Main results

We are going to prove that system (1.1)–(1.8) has a global smooth solution close to any equilibrium state. Namely, we have the following theorem.

Theorem 2.1.

Let (ϱ¯,0,ϑ¯,Er¯,B¯,0) be a constant state, with ϱ¯>0, ϑ¯>0 and Er¯>0, and compatibility condition Er¯=aϑ¯4, and suppose that d3. There exists ε>0 such that for any initial state (ϱ0,u0,ϑ0,Er0,B0,E0) satisfying




there exists a unique global solution (ϱ,u,ϑ,Er,B,E) to (1.1)–(1.8) such that


In addition, this solution satisfies the following energy inequality:


for some constant C>0 which does not depend on t.

The large time behavior of the solution is described as follows.

Theorem 2.2.

Let d3. The unique global solution (ϱ,u,ϑ,Er,B,E) to (1.1)–(1.8), defined in Theorem 2.1, converges to the constant state (ϱ¯,0,ϑ¯,Er¯,B¯,0) uniformly in xR3 as t. More precisely,

(ϱ-ϱ¯,u,ϑ-ϑ¯,Er-Er¯,E)(t)Wd-2,0as t.

Moreover, if d4, then

(B-B¯)(t)Wd-4,0as t,

Remark 2.3.

Note that, due to lack of dissipation by viscous, thermal and radiative fluxes, the Kawashima–Shizuta stability criterion (see [17] and [1]) is not satisfied for the system under study, and the techniques of [13] relying on the existence of a compensating matrix do not apply. However, we will check that radiative sources play the role of relaxation terms for the temperature and radiative energy and this will lead to global existence for the system.

3 Global existence

3.1 A priori estimates

Multiplying (1.2) by u, (1.5) by B, (1.6) by E and adding the result to equations (1.3) and (1.4), we get the total energy conservation law


Introducing the entropy s of the fluid by the Gibbs law ϑds=de+pd(1ϱ) and denoting by Sr:=43aTr3 the radiative entropy, equation (1.4) is rewritten as


The internal energy equation is


and by dividing it by ϑ, we get the entropy equation for matter


So adding (3.3) and (3.2), we obtain


By subtracting (3.4) from (3.1) and using the conservation of mass, we get


By introducing the Helmholtz functions


we check that the quantities Hϑ¯(ϱ,ϑ)-(ϱ-ϱ¯)ϱHϑ¯(ϱ¯,ϑ¯)-Hϑ¯(ϱ¯,ϑ¯) and Hr,ϑ¯(Tr)-Hr,ϑ¯(T¯r) are non-negative and strictly coercive functions reaching zero minima at the equilibrium state (ϱ¯,ϑ¯,E¯r).

Lemma 3.1.

Let ϱ¯ and ϑ¯=T¯r be given positive constants. Let O1 and O2 be the sets defined by


Then there exist positive constants C1,2(ϱ¯,ϑ¯) and C3,4(T¯r) such that


for all (ϱ,ϑ)O1, and


for all TrO2.


The first assertion is proved in [8], and we only sketch the proof for convenience. According to the decomposition




one checks that is strictly convex and reaches a zero minimum at ϱ¯, while 𝒢 is strictly decreasing for ϑ<ϑ¯ and strictly increasing for ϑ>ϑ¯, according to the standard thermodynamic stability properties, see [8]. Computing the derivatives of Hϑ¯ leads directly to estimate (3.5).

The second assertion follows from the properties of


Using the previous entropy properties, we have the following energy estimate.

Proposition 3.2.

Let the assumptions of Theorem 2.1 be satisfied with


Consider a solution (ϱ,u,ϑ,Er,B,E) of system (1.1)–(1.3) on [0,t], for some t>0. Then, for a constant C0>0, one gets



We define


multiply (3.4) by ϑ¯, and subtract the result to (3.1). By integrating over [0,t]×3, we find


Applying Lemma 3.1 yields (3.6). ∎

By defining, for any d3, the auxiliary quantities




we can bound the spatial derivatives as follows.

Proposition 3.3.

Assume that the hypotheses of Theorem 2.1 are satisfied. Then, for C0>0, we have



By rewriting system (1.1)–(1.6) in the form


and applying x to this system, we get




Then, by taking the scalar product of each of the previous equations, respectively, by


and adding the resulting equations, we get




By integrating (3.8) on space, one gets


Integrating now with respect to t and summing on , with ||d, yields


By observing that


and using the commutator estimates (see the Moser-type calculus inequalities in [16])


we see that


Then integrating with respect to time gives


for any ||d. Similarly, we estimate


Then we get


Then integrating with respect to time yields


for any ||d. ∎

The above results, together with (3.6), allow us to derive the following energy bound.

Corollary 3.4.

Assume that the assumptions of Proposition 3.2 are satisfied. Then


Our goal is now to derive bounds for the integrals in the right- and left-hand sides of equation (3.9). For this purpose we adapt the results of Ueda, Wang and Kawashima [20].

Lemma 3.5.

Under the assumptions of Theorem 2.1, and supposing that d3, we have the following estimate for any ε>0:



We linearize the principal part of system (1.1)–(1.3) as follows:


with coefficients


and sources




By multiplying (3.11) by -a¯1divxu, (3.12) by a¯1xϱ+a¯2xϑ+a¯3xEr+E, (3.13) by -a¯2divxu+ϑ-ϑ¯, (3.14) by -a¯3divxu+Er-E¯r, (3.15) by 1, (3.16) by u and summing up, we get




By rearranging the left-hand side of (3.17), we get




Integrating (3.18) over space and using Young’s inequality yields


In fact, in the same way one obtains estimates for the derivatives of V. Namely, applying x to system (3.11)–(3.16), we get




Integrating (3.19) over space and time yields


By observing that


and summing (3.20) on for 1d-1, we get


where we used Corollary 3.4.

Let us estimate the last integral in (3.20). We have


for 1||d-1. Then


Plugging bounds (3.21) into the last inequality gives


which completes the proof of Lemma 3.5. ∎

Finally, we check from [20, Lemma 4.4] that the following result for the Maxwell’s system holds true for our system with a similar proof.

Lemma 3.6.

Under the assumptions of Theorem 2.1, and supposing that d3, for any ε>0, the following estimate (here, we set V=(ϱ,u,ϑ,Er,B,E)T) holds:



By applying x to (1.5) and (1.6), multiplying, respectively, by -curlxxB and curlxxE, and adding the resulting equations, we get






Integrating in space gives


By integrating on time and summing for 1||d-2, we have


where we used the bound


obtained in the same way as in the proof of Lemma 3.5. The proof of Lemma 3.6 is completed. ∎

We are now in position to conclude with the proofs of Theorems 2.1 and 2.2.

3.2 Proof of Theorem 2.1

We first point out that local existence for the hyperbolic system (1.1)–(1.6) may be proved using standard fixed-point methods. We refer to [16] for the proof.

Now, by plugging (3.22) into (3.10) with ε small enough, we get


Putting this last estimate into (3.22) yields


Then, from (3.10), (3.23) and (3.24), we get


or, equivalently,


Now, by observing that, provided d3, one has (V-V¯)(t)HdE(t)CF(t), and, provided d2, one has I(t)CD(t) for some positive constant C, we see that


In order to prove global existence, we argue by contradiction, and assume that Tc>0 is the maximum time existence. Then we necessarily have


where N(t) is defined by


Thus, we are left to prove that N is bounded. For this purpose, we use the argument used in [3]. After the previous calculation, we have

N(t)2C(V0-V¯Hd2+N(t)3)for all T[0,Tc].(3.25)

Hence, setting V0-V¯Hd=ε, we have


By studying the variation of ϕ(N)=N2/(ε2+N3), we see that ϕ(0)=0, and that ϕ is increasing on the interval [0,(2ε2)1/3] and decreasing on the interval [(2ε2)1/3,+). Hence,


Hence, we can choose ε small enough to have ϕ(N)C for all N[0,N*], where N*>0, and we see that NN*, which contradicts (3.25).

4 Large time behavior

We have the following analogue of Proposition 3.2 for time derivatives.

Corollary 4.1.

Let the assumptions of Theorem 2.1 be satisfied, and consider the solution V:=(ϱ,u,ϑ,Er,B,E) of system (1.1)–(1.3) on [0,t], for some t>0. Then, for a constant C0>0, one gets



By using system (3.7), we see that




Then, for d3, using the uniform estimate V-V¯Hd2C of Theorem 2.1, we get estimate (4.1). ∎

4.1 Proof of Theorem 2.2

By using Corollary 4.1, we get


This implies that




and then

(ϱ-ϱ¯,u,ϑ-ϑ¯,Er-E¯r)(t)Hd-10when t.

Now, by applying the Gagliardo–Nirenberg inequality and (2.1), we get



(ϱ-ϱ¯,u,ϑ-ϑ¯,Er-E¯r)(t)Wd-2,0when t.



and then

E(t)Wd-1,0when t.



Then, arguing as before,



(B-B¯)Wd-4,0when t,

which completes the proof.


  • [1]

    K. Beauchard and E. Zuazua, Large time asymptotics for partially dissipative hyperbolic systems, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 199 (2011), no. 1, 177–227.  CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [2]

    S. Benzoni-Gavage and D. Serre, Multidimensional Hyperbolic Partial Differential Equations. First-Order Systems and Applications, Oxford Math. Monogr., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007. Google Scholar

  • [3]

    X. Blanc, B. Ducomet and S. Nečasová, On some singular limits in damped radiation hydrodynamics, J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ. 13 (2016), no. 2, 249–271.  Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [4]

    X. Blanc, B. Ducomet and Š. Nečasová, Global existence of a diffusion limit with damping for the compressible radiative Euler system coupled to an electromagnetic field, Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal., to appear.  Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [5]

    C. Buet and B. Després, Asymptotic analysis of fluid models for the coupling of radiation and hydrodynamics, J. Qant. Spectroscopy Radiative Transf. 85 (2004), 385–418.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6]

    A. R. Choudhuri, The Physics of Fluids and Plasmas: An Introduction for Astrophysicists, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998. Google Scholar

  • [7]

    B. Ducomet and Š. Nečasová, Singular limits in a model of radiative flow, J. Math. Fluid Mech. 17 (2015), no. 2, 341–380. CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [8]

    E. Feireisl and A. Novotný, Singular Limits in Thermodynamics of Viscous Fluids, Adv. Math. Fluid Mech., Birkhäuser, Basel, 2009.  Google Scholar

  • [9]

    Y.-H. Feng, S. Wang and S. Kawashima, Global existence and asymptotic decay of solutions to the non-isentropic Euler–Maxwell system, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 24 (2014), no. 14, 2851–2884.  CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [10]

    Y.-H. Feng, S. Wang and X. Li, Stability of non-constant steady-state solutions for non-isentropic Euler–Maxwell system with a temperature damping term, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 39 (2016), no. 10, 2514–2528.  CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [11]

    B. Hanouzet and R. Natalini, Global existence of smooth solutions for partially dissipative hyperbolic systems with a convex entropy, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 169 (2003), no. 2, 89–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [12]

    J. W. Jerome, The Cauchy problem for compressible hydrodynamic-Maxwell systems: A local theory for smooth solutions, Differential Integral Equations 16 (2003), no. 11, 1345–1368.  Google Scholar

  • [13]

    S. Kawashima, Systems of a hyperbolic-parabolic composite type, with applications to the equations of magnetohydrodynamics, Doctoral Thesis, Kyoto University, 1984.  Google Scholar

  • [14]

    C. Lin and T. Goudon, Global existence of the equilibrium diffusion model in radiative hydrodynamics, Chin. Ann. Math. Ser. B 32 (2011), no. 4, 549–568.  Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [15]

    R. B. Lowrie, J. E. Morel and J. A. Hittinger, The coupling of radiation and hydrodynamic, Astrophys. J. 521 (1999), 432–450.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [16]

    A. Majda, Compressible Fluid Flow and Systems of Conservation Laws in Several Space Variables, Appl. Math. Sci. 53, Springer, New York, 1984.  Google Scholar

  • [17]

    Y. Shizuta and S. Kawashima, Systems of equations of hyperbolic-parabolic type with applications to the discrete Boltzmann equation, Hokkaido Math. J. 14 (1985), no. 2, 249–275.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [18]

    Z. Tan and Y. Wang, Large-time behavior of solutions to the compressible non-isentropic Euler–Maxwell system in 3, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 15 (2014), 187–204.  Google Scholar

  • [19]

    Y. Ueda and S. Kawashima, Decay property of regularity-loss type for the Euler–Maxwell system, Methods Appl. Anal. 18 (2011), no. 3, 245–267.  Google Scholar

  • [20]

    Y. Ueda, S. Wang and S. Kawashima, Dissipative structure of the regularity-loss type and time asymptotic decay of solutions for the Euler–Maxwell system, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 44 (2012), no. 3, 2002–2017.  CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [21]

    J. Xu and J. Xiong, Global existence of classical solutions of full Euler–Maxwell equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 402 (2013), no. 2, 545–557.  Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-05-22

Accepted: 2018-02-28

Published Online: 2018-03-21

Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche

Award identifier / Grant number: ANR-15-CE40-0011

Funding Source: Grantová Agentura České Republiky

Award identifier / Grant number: 201-16-03230S

Šárka Nečasová acknowledges the support of the GAČR (Czech Science Foundation) project 16-03230S in the framework of RVO: 67985840. Bernard Ducomet is partially supported by the ANR project INFAMIE (ANR-15-CE40-0011).

Citation Information: Advances in Nonlinear Analysis, Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 1158–1170, ISSN (Online) 2191-950X, ISSN (Print) 2191-9496, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/anona-2017-0117.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License. BY 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in