Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Anthropological Review

The Journal of Polish Anthropological Society

4 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.71

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.301
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.695

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Obesity - a natural consequence of human evolution

Maciej Henneberg / James Grantham
Published Online: 2014-02-20 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2014-0001


Obesity is considered a major epidemic of the 21st century. In developed countries, about 1/3 of adults are obese and another 1/3 overweight according to the oversimplified measure - the Body Mass Index. More precise indicators of adiposity: waist circumference, skinfolds, underwater weighing and absorptiometry indicate similar levels of fatness. Obesity per se does not necessarily lead to pathological states, nor to premature mortality. Recent results of large sample studies indicate that more than 1/3 of people classified as obese by fatness indices are physiologically normal. Others, however, suffer from a number of pathological conditions, common among them being the metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. The classical explanation for increasing obesity is the positive energy balance - too much food intake and too little exercise. It seems, however, that this explanation is too simplistic. In societies, and in families, exposed to overeating and lazy lifestyles, about 1/3 of individuals have normal body mass and low levels of fatness, while others become obese. There is, therefore, individual variation in propensity for obesity. We have identified two specific variables differentiating fatness. People who have large lean trunk frames - large volumes of abdominal cavities and thus large gastrointestinal tracts - put on more subcutaneous fat than those with smaller trunk frames (Henneberg and Ulijaszek 2010). This may be a result of larger volumes of food required for antral extension to release ghrelin, or larger surface area of small intestines for food absorption. The second variable is concentrations of Alanine Transaminase, an enzyme responsible for conversion of an amino acid to a carbon skeleton that can be used in fat synthesis. Our study of 46000 young Swiss males (Henneberg, Rühli, Gruber and Woitek 2011) found consistent correlation between levels of Alanine Transaminase and body weight in groups of normal body mass individuals, overweight individuals and moderately obese individuals. Coupling this finding with the fact that among vegetarians, even those living in North America with overabundance of food and low levels of exercise, obesity and overweight are much less common than among non-vegetarians, we have now hypothesized that the increased obesity of modern affluent societies is a result of consumption of animal protein when energy needs are already covered by carbohydrates and fat consumed concurrently. Until the advent of agriculture, humans relied on consumption of a variety of terrestrial and aquatic animals supplemented by relatively small amounts of plant foods. In this situation our bodies became adapted to use proteins as a source of energy, and became efficient at storing occasional surpluses of amino acids by their deamination and conversion to fats. In the modern diets carbohydrates are abundant and provide, together with fats, energy required by human bodies, proteins after deamination are efficiently converted to fats. When new types of crops are introduced to mass production of cheap foods our bodies may not be able to react correctly to all their contents and some of the ingredients may cause additional fatness. An example of widespread recent introduction of industrially processed soybean products that correlates with prevalence of obesity across countries of the world is discussed

Keywords: adiposity; gut size; alanine transaminase; protein; vegetarian


  • Aiello LC, Wheeler P. 1995. The expensive-tissue hypothesis - the brain and the digestive- system in human and primate evolution. Curr Anthropol 362(2):199-221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Armstrong DB, Dublin LI, Wheatley GM, Marks HH. 1951. Obesity and its relation to health and disease. JAMA 147(11):1007-14.Google Scholar

  • Bersaglieri T, Sabeti PC, Patterson N, Vanderploeg T, Schaffner SF, Drake JA, Rhodes M, Reich DE, Hirschhorn JN. 2004. Genetic signatures of strong recent positive selection at the lactase gene. Am J Hum Genet 74:1111-20.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown CD, Higgins M, Donato KA, Rohde FC, Garrison R, Oberzanek E, Ernst ND, Horan M. 2000. Body mass index and the prevalence of hypertension and dyslipidemia. Obesity 8(9):605-19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cabarello B. 2005. A nutrition paradox - underweight and obesity in developing nations. New Engl J Med 352(15):1514-16.Google Scholar

  • Chiang BN, Pearlman LV. 1969. Overweight and hypertension: a review. Circulation 39(1): 403-21.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Durdin E. 2007 Lean shape and fatness: Lean frame size and skinfold thickness in South Australiam youth. Anatomical Sciences. The University of Adelaide.Google Scholar

  • Gofman JW. 1952. Obesity, fat metabolism and metabolic disease. Circulation 5(1):514-17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hengstler JG, Heimerdinger CK, Schiffler IB, Gebhard S, Sagemüller J, Taner B, Bolt HM, Oesch F. 2002. Dietary Topoisomerase - II poisons:contribution of soy prod ucts to infant leukemia? EXCLI Journal 1:8-14.Google Scholar

  • Henneberg M, Sarafis V, Mathers K. 1998. Human adaptations to meat eating. Human Evolution 13:229-34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Henneberg M, Rühli FJ, Gruber P, Woitek U. 2011, Alanine transaminase individual variation is a better marker than socio- cultural factors for body mass increase in healthy males. FNS 2(1):1054-62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Henneberg M, Ulijaszek SJ. 2010. Body frame dimensions are related to obesity and fatness: lean trunk size, skinfolds, and body mass index. Am J Hum Biol 22(1):83-91.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Henneberg M, Veitch D. 2003. National size and shape survey of Australia. Kinanthreport 16:34-39Google Scholar

  • Henneberg M, Veitch D. 2005. Is obesity as measured by body mass index and waist circumference in adult Australian women in 2002 just a result of the lifestyle. Hum Ecol Special Issue 13(1):85-89.Google Scholar

  • Hounnou G, Destrieux C, Desme J, Bertrand P, Velut S. 2002. Anatomical study of the length of the human intestine. Surg Radiol Anat 24:290-94.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Hsieh PS. 2011. Obesity and carcinogenesis. J Cancer Res Pract 27(6):242-56.Google Scholar

  • Kannel WD. Gordon T, Castelli WP. 1979. Obesity, lipids and glucose intolerance. Am J Clin Nutr (32)6:1238-45.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Kunej T, Jevsinek Skok D, Zorc M, Ogrinc A, Michal JJ, Kovac M, Jiang Z. 2012. Obesity gene atlas in mammals. Journal of Genomics 1:45-55.Google Scholar

  • Lucas T, Henneberg M. 2013. Body frame variation and adiposity in development, a mixed-longitudinal study of ‘Cape Coloured’ children. Am J Hum Biol (doi: 10.1002/ajhb.22494).CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Ortega FB, Lee D, Katzmarzyk PT, Ruiz JR, Sui X, Church TS, Blair SN. 2013. The intriguing metabolically healthy but obese phenotype: cardiovascular prognosis and role of fitness. Eur Heart J 34(5):389-97.Web of SciencePubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roccisano D, Henneberg M. 2012. The contribution of soy consumption to obesity. FNS 3(2):260-66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rühli FJ, Henneberg M. 2013. New perspectives on evolutionary medicine: the relevance of microevolution for human health and disease. BioMed Central 11(1):115-21.Google Scholar

  • Saniotis A, Henneberg M. 2011. Medicine could be constructing human bodies in the future. Medical Hypotheses 77(4):560-64.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Santos JL, Saus E, Smalley SV, Cataldo LR, Alberti G, Parada J, Gratacos M, Estivill X. 2012. Copy number polymorphism of the salivary amylase gene: Implications in human nutrition research. J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics 5:117-31.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Sawaya AL, Dallal G, Solymos G, de Sousa MH, Ventura ML, Roberts SB. 1995. Obesity and malnutrition in a shantytown population in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Obes Res 3(2):107-15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schafer O. 1977. Are Eskimos more or less obese than other Canadians? A comparison of skinfold thickness and ponderal index in Canadian Eskimos. Am J Clin Nutr 30(10):1623-28.Google Scholar

  • Shepard RJ, Jones G, Ishii K, Kaneko M, Olbrecht AJ. 1969. Factors affecting body density and thickness of subcutaneous fat. Am J Clin Nutr 22(9):1175-89.Google Scholar

  • Seppanen CM, Csallany AS. 2006. The effect of intermittent and continuous heating of soybean oil at frying temperature on the formation of 4-hydroxy-2-trans-nonenal and other α-, β-unsaturated hydroxyaldehydes. JAOCS 83(2):121-22.Google Scholar

  • Spencer EA, Appleby PN, Davey GK, Key TJ. 2003. Diet and body mass index in 38 000 EPIC-Oxford meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans, Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 27(6):728-34.Google Scholar

  • Stephan C, Henneberg M. 2001. Medicine may be reducing the human capacity to survive. Med Hypotheses 57:633-37.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stein CJ, Colditz GA. 2004. The epidemic of obesity. J Clin Endocr Metab 89(6):2522-25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Terry AH. 1923. Obesity and hypertension. JAMA 81(15):1283-93. Thieme H. 2005. The Lower Paleolithic art of hunting. In: C Gamble and M Parr, editors. The hominid individual in context: archaeological investigations of Lower and Middle Paleolithic landscapes, locales and artefacts. London: Routeledge. 115-13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tonsad S, Butler T, Yan R, Fraser GE. 2009. Type of vegetarian diet, body weight and prevalence of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 32(5):791-96. World Health Organisation. 2013. Obesity and overweight. http://www.who.int/gho/ncd/risk_factors/obesity_text/en/index.html (Accessed 30 Jan, 2013). World Health Organisation. 2013. Western Pacific region: obesity. http://www.wpro.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/obesity/en/index.html (Accessed 30 Jan, 2013).Google Scholar

  • Wrangham R. 2009. Catching Fire: how cooking made us human. New York: Harper Row.Google Scholar

  • Yamashita Y, Kawada SZ, Nakano H. 1990. Induction of mammalian topoisomerase ii dependent dna cleavage by nonintercalative flavonoids, genistein and orobol. Biochem Pharmacol 39(4):737-44. PubMedGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2014-02-20

Published in Print: 2014-01-01

Citation Information: Anthropological Review, Volume 77, Issue 1, Pages 1–10, ISSN (Online) 2083-4594, ISSN (Print) 1898-6773, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2014-0001.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Joseph J. Castillo, Robert A. Orlando, and William S. Garver
Genes & Nutrition, 2017, Volume 12, Number 1
Joseph J. Castillo, Zachary S. Hazlett, Robert A. Orlando, and William S. Garver
Gene, 2017, Volume 627, Page 412
Frank Rühli, Martin Haeusler, Arthur Saniotis, and Maciej Henneberg
Medical Science Educator, 2016, Volume 26, Number 3, Page 375
Maria Enrica Danubio, Nicola Milia, Alfredo Coppa, Fabrizio Rufo, and Emanuele Sanna
HOMO - Journal of Comparative Human Biology, 2016, Volume 67, Number 1, Page 11

Comments (1)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in
  • The answer is that it's a tough fight getting obese in the countries and tribes where it is fine to be obese. The body fights against the fattening of violent feeling of nausea. To be bold, it is important: 1. The fact that the food is digested quickly. Such as sugar and plant oils. Natural food is a night and a day to be digested. All vegetables except radishes are prohibited. Radishes alerts for abetit. 2. The fact that the food is easy to chew because chewing provides satiety. It is also beneficial to drink with a straw, because then it only sinks small sips. 3. Carbon dioxide hides the food's nutritional content of the brain so that the food is easier to eat. If you do not believe in this, so drink a soda where you removed the roar. You can hardly get it down. 4. It is also possible to block satiety chemical. There must be only small amounts of active substance because the substances to be five weeks to get out of the brain again. Coco-cola added an extract of the coca plant, which promotes the sale of food the places where they sell Coco-cola for the food, because it's the same customers who come every day, then piling the active substances themselves up in the brain, so the five weeks can eat larger portions than before. Try it yourself.

    posted by: Peter Kvint on 2016-08-02 10:21 PM (Europe/Berlin)