Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Anthropological Review

The Journal of Polish Anthropological Society

4 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.71

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.301
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.695

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Olfactory processing and odor specificity: a meta-analysis of menstrual cycle variation in olfactory sensitivity

Lenka Martinec Nováková
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Jan Havlíček / S. Craig Roberts
Published Online: 2014-12-20 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2014-0024


Cycle-correlated variation in olfactory threshold, with women becoming more sensitive to odors mid-cycle, is somewhat supported by the literature but the evidence is not entirely consistent, with several studies finding no, or mixed, effects. It has been argued that cyclic shifts in olfactory threshold might be limited to odors relevant to the mating context.

We aimed to test whether the evidence currently available points in the direction of odor-specific or, rather, general changes in olfactory sensitivity and, if the former is the case, to what group of odorants in particular. We carried out a meta-analysis of relevant studies which together used a variety of different odorants, including some found in food, body odor, and some that occur in neither of these. First we tested whether there appears to be an overall effect when all studies are included. Next, we hypothesised that if cyclic changes in olfactory processing are odor-specific and tuned to biologically relevant odors, we should find changes in detection thresholds only for odorants found in body odor, or for those that are perceptually similar to it. In contrast, if threshold patterns are linked to more general fluctuations in odor processing across the cycle, we would not expect changes in relation to any particular odorant group.

The results support the view that there is significant cycle-correlated variation. Thresholds were in general significantly lower in the fertile than the non-fertile phases, with effect sizes consistently in this direction. This same conclusion applied to both ‘food’ and ‘musky’ odorants, despite their different evolutionary significance, and to the androgen steroids (androstadienone, androstenone, and androsterone), but could not be applied to phenyl-ethyl alcohol.

The results indicate that olfactory sensitivity may be a non-adaptive by-product of the general physiological fluctuations or differences in neural processing experienced across the cycle to a broad spectrum of odorants, rather than being specifically selected for mate choice-related odors.

Keywords: menstrual cycle; mate choice; odor threshold; human oestrus; olfaction


  • Amoore JE, Popplewell JR, Whissell-Buechy D. 1975. Sensitivity of women to musk odor: no menstrual variation. J Chem Ecol 1(3):291-97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Arctander S. 1969. Perfume and Flavor Chemicals: (aroma Chemicals). Montclair, NJ: TheAuthor.Google Scholar

  • Becker D, Creutzfeldt OD, Schwibbe M, Wuttke W. 1982. Changes in physiological, EEG and psychological parameters in women during the spontaneous menstrual- cycle and following oral-contraceptives. Psychoneuroendocrinology 7(1):75-90.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bedoukian. Safety Data Sheet [Internet]. Danbury, CT: Bedoukian Research.Google Scholar

  • Bedoukian PZ. 1986. Perfumery and flavoring synthetics. Wheaton, IL: Allured Publishing Corp.Google Scholar

  • Bremner EA, Mainland JD, Khan RM, Sobel N. 2003. The prevalence of androstenone anosmia. Chem Senses 28(5):423-32.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Burdock GA. 2009. Fenaroli’s Handbook of Flavor Ingredients, Sixth Edition. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

  • Caruso S, Grillo C, Agnello C, Maiolino L, Intelisano G, Serra A. 2001. A prospective study evidencing rhinomanometric and olfactometric outcomes in women taking oral contraceptives. Hum Reprod 16(11):2288-94.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • De Rovira D. 2008. Dictionary of Flavors. Ames, IA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

  • Doty RL. 1979. Procedure for combining menstrual cycle data. J Clin Endocr Metab 48(6):912-18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Doty RL, Cameron EL. 2009. Sex differences and reproductive hormone influences on human odor perception. Physiol Behav 97(2):213-28.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Doty RL, Gregor TP, Settle RG. 1986. Influence of Intertrial Interval and Sniff-Bottle Volume on Phenyl Ethyl-Alcohol Odor Detection Thresholds. Chem Senses 11(2):259-64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Doty RL, Hall JW, Flickinger GL, Sondheimer SJ. 1982. Cyclic changes in olfactory and auditory sensitivity during the menstrual cycle: no attenuation by oral contraceptive medication. In: W Breipohl, editor. Olfaction and endocrine regulation. London: IRL Press. 35-42.Google Scholar

  • Doty RL, McKeown DA, Lee WW, Shaman P. 1995. A study of the test-retest reliability of ten olfactory tests. Chem Senses 20(6):645-56.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Doty RL, Snyder PJ, Huggins GR, Lowry LD. 1981. Endocrine, cardiovascular, and psychological correlated of olfactory sensitivity changes during the human menstrual cycle. J Comp Physiol Psych 95(1):45-60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dye L. 1992. Visual information processing and the menstrual cycle. In: JTE Richardson, editor. Cognition and the menstrual cycle. New York: Springer Verlag. 67-97.Google Scholar

  • Gangestad SW, Thornhill R. 1998. Menstrual cycle variation in women’s preferences for the scent of symmetrical men. Proc R Soc B 265(1399):927-33.Google Scholar

  • Gangestad SW, Thornhill R. 2008. Human oestrus. Proc R Soc B 275(1638):991-1000.Google Scholar

  • Good PR, Geary N, Engen T. 1976. The effect of estrogen on odor detection. Chem Senses 2(1):45-50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gower DB, Nixon A, Mallet AI. 1998. The significance of odorous steroids in axillary odour. In: S Van Toller and Dodd GH, editors. Perfumery. London: Chapman & Hall. 47-75.Google Scholar

  • Grillo C, La Mantia I, Triolo C, Scollo A, La Boria A, Intelisano G, Caruso S. 2001. Rhinomanometric and olfactometric variations throughout the menstrual cycle. Ann Oto Rhinol Laryn 110(8):785-89.Google Scholar

  • Havlícek J, Roberts SC, Flegr J. 2005. Women’s preference for dominant male odour: effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status. Biology Letters 1(3):256-59.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hedges LV, Olkin I. 1985. Statistical methods for meta-analysis New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Hummel T, Gollisch R, Wildt G, Kobal G. 1991. Changes in olfactory perception during the menstrual cycle. Experientia 47(7):712-15.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, Pauli E, Kobal G. 1997. ‘Sniffin’ Sticks’: Olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses 22(1):39-52. PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jacob TJC, Wang LW, Jaffer S, McPhee S. 2006. Changes in the odor quality of androstadienone during exposure-induced sensitization. Chem Senses 31(1):3-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Keller A, Vosshall LB. 2004. Human olfactory psychophysics. Curr Biol 14(20):R875-R878.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kuga M, Ikeda M, Suzuki K. 1999. Gustatory changes associated with the menstrual cycle. Physiol Behav 66(2):317-22. Le Magnen J. 1952. Les phénoménes olfacto- sexuels chez l’homme. Archives des Sciences Physiologiques 6:125-60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lundström JN, McClintock MK, Olsson MJ. 2005. Effects of reproductive state on olfactory sensitivity suggest odor specificity. Biol Psychol 71(3):244-47.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Mair RG, Bouffard JA, Engen T, Morton TH. 1978. Olfactory sensitivity during the menstrual cycle. Sensory Processes 2(2):90-98.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • McNeil J, Cameron JD, Finlayson G, Blundell JE, Doucet E. 2013. Greater overall olfactory performance, explicit wanting for high fat foods and lipid intake during the mid-luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Physiol Behav 112:84-89.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Navarrete-Palacios E, Hudson R, Reyes-Guerrero G, Guevara-Guzmán R. 2003. Lower olfactory threshold during the ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle. Biol Psychol 63(3):269-79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • NCBI. 2014. PubChem. 2004 ed. Bethesda, MD: National Center for Biotechnology Information.Google Scholar

  • Pause BM, Sojka B, Krauel K, Fehm Wolfsdorf G, Ferstl R. 1996. Olfactory information processing during the course of the menstrual cycle. Biol Psychol 44(1):31-54.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Purdon SE, Klein S, Flor-Henry P. 2001. Menstrual effects on asymmetrical olfactory acuity. J Int Neuropsych Soc 7(6):703-09.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Raghava GPS. 2011. DrugPedia: A Wikipedia for Drug Discovery. Chandigarh, India.Google Scholar

  • Renfro KJ, Hoffmann H. 2013. The relationship between oral contraceptive use and sensitivity to olfactory stimuli. Horm Behav 63(3):491-96.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenthal R. 1991. Meta-analytical procedures for social research. London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Rosenthal R, DiMatteo MR. 2001. Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annu Rev Psychol 52:59-82.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Rusak B, Zucker I. 1979. Neural regulation of circadian rhythms. Physiol Rev 59(3):449-526.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Saxton TK, Lyndon A, Little AC, Roberts SC. 2008. Evidence that androstadienone, a putative human chemosignal, modulates women’s attributions of men’s attractiveness. Horm Behav 54(5):597-601.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidt H. 1990. Methods of meta-analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Stevens JC, Cain WS, Burke RJ. 1988. Variability of olfactory thresholds. Chemi Senses 13(4):643-53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sueda K, Arao Y, Nishida N. 2003. Changes in olfactory perception for androstenone during the menstrual cycle. Aroma Research 4:51-55.Google Scholar

  • Vierling J, Rock J. 1967. Variations in olfactory sensitivity to exaltolide during the menstrual cycle. J Appl Physiol 22(2):311-15.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Vo UUT, Morris MP. 2014. Nonvolatile, semivolatile, or volatile: Redefining volatile for volatile organic compounds. J Air Waste Manage 64(6):661-69. Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Whissell-Buechy D, Amoore JE. 1973. Odour-blindness to musk: simple recessive inheritance. Nature 242(5395):271-73.Google Scholar

  • Wolf FM. 1986. Meta-analysis quantitative methods for research synthesis London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Wysocki CJ, Beauchamp GK. 1984. Ability to smell androstenone is genetically determined PNAS Biol Sci 81(15):4899-902. Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2014-10-16

Accepted: 2014-11-05

Published Online: 2014-12-20

Published in Print: 2014-12-01

Citation Information: Anthropological Review, ISSN (Online) 2083-4594, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2014-0024.

Export Citation

© Anthropological Review. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Jitka Fialová, S. Craig Roberts, and Jan Havlíček
Appetite, 2016, Volume 97, Page 8

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in