Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Archives of Acoustics

The Journal of Institute of Fundamental Technological of Polish Academy of Sciences

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.816
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.835

CiteScore 2016: 1.15

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.432
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.948

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 39, Issue 1 (Mar 2015)

An Introduction to Virtual Phased Arrays for Beamforming Applications

Daniel Fernández Comesana
  • Institute of Sound and Vibration Research University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, Southampton, UK
  • Microflown Technologies Tivolilaan 205, 6824 BV, Arnhem, the Netherlands
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Keith R. Holland / Dolores García Escribano / Hans-Elias de Bree
Published Online: 2015-03-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoa-2014-0009


Sound localization problems are usually tackled by the acquisition of data from phased microphone arrays and the application of acoustic holography or beamforming algorithms. However, the number of sensors required to achieve reliable results is often prohibitive, particularly if the frequency range of interest is wide. It is shown that the number of sensors required can be reduced dramatically providing the sound field is time stationary. The use of scanning techniques such as “Scan & Paint” allows for the gathering of data across a sound field in a fast and efficient way, using a single sensor and webcam only. It is also possible to characterize the relative phase field by including an additional static microphone during the acquisition process. This paper presents the theoretical and experimental basis of the proposed method to localise sound sources using only one fixed microphone and one moving acoustic sensor. The accuracy and resolution of the method have been proven to be comparable to large microphone arrays, thus constituting the so called “virtual phased arrays”.

Keywords: beamforming; source localization; virtual phased arrays; measurement techniques


  • 1. Camier C, Blais J.-F., Lapointe R., Berry A. (2012), A time-domain analysis of 3D non-uniform moving acoustic sources: application to source identification and absolute quantification via beamforming, Proceeding of Berlin Beamforming Conference, Germany.Google Scholar

  • 2. Curlander J.C., McDonough R.N. (1991), Synthetic Aperture Radar: Systems and Signal Processing, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

  • 3. Cutrona L.J. (1975), Comparison of sonar system performance achievable using synthetic-aperture techniques with the performance achievable with more conventional means, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 58, 336-348.Google Scholar

  • 4. Cutrona L.J. (1977), Additional characteristics of synthetic-aperture sonar systems and a further comparison with nonsynthetic-aperture sonar systems, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 61, 1213-1217.Google Scholar

  • 5. De Hoop A.T. (2009), Electromagnetic radiation from moving, pulsed source distributions: The 3D timedomain relativistic Doppler effect, Wave motion, 46, 74-77.Google Scholar

  • 6. Fernandez Comesana D., Wind J., Holland K.R., Grosso A. (2011), Far field source localization using two transducers: a virtual array approach, Proceedings of 18th International Congress of Sound and Vibration, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Google Scholar

  • 7. Fernandez Comesana D., Wind J., de Bree H.E., Holland K.R. (2012), Virtual Arrays, a novel broadband source localization technique, Proceedings of NOVEM: Emerging Methods.Google Scholar

  • 8. Fernández Comesana D., Fernández Grande E., Tiana-Roig E, Holland K.R. (2013a), A novel deconvolution beamforming algorithm for virtual phased arrays, Proceedings of Internoise.Google Scholar

  • 9. Fernández Comesana D., Wind J., de Bree H.E., Holland K.R. (2013b), Assessing Vehicle Exterior Noise Using a Virtual Phased Array (VPA), SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-1968, 2013.Google Scholar

  • 10. Fernández Comesana D., Steltenpool S., Carrillo Pousa G., de Bree H.E., Holland K.R. (2013c), Scan and paint: theory and practice of a sound field visualization method, ISRN Mechanical Engineering, Volume 2013, ID 241958, 11 pages.Google Scholar

  • 11. Hayes M.P., Gough P.T. (2009), Synthetic aperture sonar: A review of current status, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 34, 207-224.Google Scholar

  • 12. Johnson D.H., Dudgeon D.E. (1993), Array signal processing: Concepts and techniques, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

  • 13. Manolakis D.G., Ingle V.K., Kogon S.M. (2005), Statistical and adaptive signal processing, Artech House.Google Scholar

  • 14. Percival D.B., Walden, A.T. (1993), Spectral Analysis for Physical applications, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • 15. Shin K., Hammond J.K. (2008), Fundamentals of signal processing for sound and vibration engineers, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

  • 16. Wiley C.A. (1985), Synthetic aperture radars, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. v. AES-21, pp. 440-443.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2013-02-08

Accepted: 2014-02-14

Published Online: 2015-03-01

Citation Information: Archives of Acoustics, ISSN (Online) 2300-262X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoa-2014-0009.

Export Citation

© 2014 Polish Academy of Sciences & Institute of Fundamental Technological Research (IPPT PAN). This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in