Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Acta Parasitologica

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 1.293

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.581
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.780
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 1.132

See all formats and pricing
Volume 59, Issue 4 (Oct 2014)


The comparison of FLOTAC, FECPAK and McMaster techniques for nematode egg counts in cattle

Antonio Bosco
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR Regione Campania, Naples, Italy
  • Email:
/ Laura Rinaldi
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR Regione Campania, Naples, Italy
  • Email:
/ Maria Maurelli
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR Regione Campania, Naples, Italy
  • Email:
/ Vincenzo Musella
  • Department of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
  • Email:
/ Gerald Coles
  • School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford House, Bristol, BS40 5DU, UK
  • Email:
/ Giuseppe Cringoli
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR Regione Campania, Naples, Italy
  • Email:
Published Online: 2014-09-20 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11686-014-0282-7


Three methods, FLOTAC, FECPAK and McMaster were compared for accuracy and sensitivity for counting numbers of nematode eggs in faeces of naturally infected cattle with high or low nematode egg counts. Only FLOTAC gave positive results for 12 replicates from pooled samples with low egg counts making it more sensitive than FECPAK (67%) and McMaster (41.7%). FLOTAC resulted in generally higher egg counts and lower coefficients of variation than the other two methods used. The reliability of FECPAK and McMaster is depended on the area under the slide counted. All three methods can be used for making decisions whether to treat but FLOTAC or Mini-FLOTAC should be used for faecal egg count reduction tests when lower egg counts are present.

Keywords: FecPak; McMaster; FLOTAC; nematode egg count; cattle

  • [1] Coles G.C., Bauer C., Borgsteede F.H., Geerts S., Klei T.R., Taylor M.A., Waller P.J. 1992. World association for the advancement of veterinary parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) methods for the detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance. Veterinary Parasitology, 44, 35–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4017(92)90141-U [Crossref]

  • [2] Cox D.D., Todd A.C. 1962. Survey of gastrointestinal parasitism in Wisconsin dairy cattle. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 141, 706–709.

  • [3] Cringoli G., Rinaldi L., Veneziano V., Capelli G., Scala A. 2004. The influence of flotation solution, sample dilution and the choice of McMaster slide area (volume) on the reliability of the Mc-Master technique in estimating the faecal egg counts of gastrointestinal strongyles and Dicrocoelium dendriticum in sheep. Veterinary Parasitology, 123, 121–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.05.021 [Crossref]

  • [4] Cringoli G., Rinaldi L., Maurelli M.P., Utzinger J. 2010. FLOTAC: new multivalent techniques for qualitative and quantitative copromicroscopici diagnosis of parasites in animals and humans. Nature Protocols, 5, 503–551. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2009.235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2009.235 [PubMed] [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • [5] Cringoli G., Rinaldi L., Albonico M., Bergquist R., Utzinger J. 2103. Geospatial(s) tools: integration of advanced epidemiological sampling and novel diagnostics. Geospatial Health, 7, 399–404. [Crossref]

  • [6] Egwang T.G., Slocombe J.O. 1982. Evaluation of the Cornell-Wisconsin centrifugal flotation technique for recoverins trichostrongylid eggs from bovine feces. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine, 46, 133–137.

  • [7] Gordon H., Whitlock H.V. 1939. A new technique for counting nematode eggs in sheep faeces. Journal Council Scientific Industrial Research, 12, 50–52.

  • [8] Levecke B., Rinaldi L., Charlier J., Maurelli M.P., Bosco A., Vercruysse J., Cringoli G. 2012. The bias, accuracy and precision of faecal egg count reduction test results in cattle using McMaster, Cornell-Wisconsin and FLOTAC egg counting methods. Veterinary Parasitology, 188, 194–199. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.03.017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.03.017 [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • [9] Levecke B., Rinaldi L., Charlier J., Maurelli M.P., Morgoglione M.E., Vercruysse, J., Cringoli G. 2011. Monitoring drug efficacy against gastrointestinal nematodes when faecal egg counts are low: do the analytic sensitivity and the formula matter? Parasitology Research, 109, 953–957. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-011-2338-z http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-011-2338-z [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • [10] MAFF, 1986. Manual of Veterinary Parasitological Techniques, Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London (1986) 160 pp.

  • [11] Mes T.H.M. 2003. Technical variability and required sample size of helminth egg isolation procedures. Veterinary Parasitology, 115, 311–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(03)00219-X [Crossref]

  • [12] Presland S.L., Morgan E.R., Coles G.C. 2005. Counting nematode eggs in equine faecal samples. Veterinary Record, 156, 208–210.

  • [13] Sutherland I.A., Leathwick D.M. 2011. Anthelmintic resistance in nematode parasites of cattle: global issue? Trends in Parasitology, 27, 176–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2010.11.008 [Web of Science] [Crossref]

About the article

Published Online: 2014-09-20

Published in Print: 2014-10-01

Citation Information: Acta Parasitologica, ISSN (Online) 1896-1851, ISSN (Print) 1230-2821, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11686-014-0282-7. Export Citation

© 2014 W. Stefański Institute of Parasitology, PAS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Beatrice Divina Barda, Jennifer Keiser, and Marco Albonico
Current Tropical Medicine Reports, 2015

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in