Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Acta Parasitologica

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 1.160
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.185

CiteScore 2016: 1.24

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.532
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.721

Online
ISSN
1896-1851
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 61, Issue 1 (Jan 2016)

Issues

Herd-level seroprevalence of Neospora caninum infection in dairy cattle in central and northeastern Poland

Sławomir J. Kowalczyk
  • Laboratory of Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Michał Czopowicz
  • Laboratory of Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Corinna N. Weber / Elisabeth Müller / Lucjan Witkowski
  • Laboratory of Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Jarosław Kaba
  • Corresponding author
  • Laboratory of Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-12-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ap-2016-0006

Abstract

A serosurvey was carried out to estimate the herd-level seroprevalence of Neospora caninum infection in cattle in central and northeastern Poland. Ninety seven dairy cattle herds from 2 provinces of Poland (Podlaskie, 47 herds and Łodzkie, 50 herds) were randomly enrolled in the study using two-stage cluster method. A simple random selection was applied within each herd to select a sample of adult cows (≥18 month-old). A total number of 734 cows were enrolled in the study. The animals were screened with a commercial competitive ELISA (Bio-X Diagnostics, Belgium). To calculate true herd-level seroprevalence test sensitivity and specificity were adjusted from an individual- to a herd-level using FreeCalc method. The true overall herd-level seroprevalence of N. caninum infection was 56.7% (95% CI: 47.5%, 65.9%). The true herd-level seroprevalence in Podlaskie was 63.3% (95% CI: 43.0%, 83.6%) and 50.5% (95% CI: 32.8%, 68.2%) in Łodzkie province and these figures did not differ significantly between the two provinces (chi2 test p = 0.238). One hundred forty three of 734 cows (19.5%) were seropositive which gave the true overall individual-level seroprevalence of 20.1% (95% CI: 17.4%, 23.2%). Percentage of seropositive cows in each herd varied from 6% to 80%. This study is the first epidemiological investigation of herd-level seroprevalence of N. caninum infection in Polish dairy cattle population. In conclusion, the result of the study confirmed previous data that N. caninum infection is widespread in the Polish cattle population and thus should be considered as a potential cause of spontaneous abortions.

Keywords : Epidemiology; parasite; abortion; competitive ELISA

References

  • Altman D.G., Machin D., Bryant T.N., Gardner M.J. (Eds.). 2000. Statistics with confidence. BMJ Books. pp. 45-57Google Scholar

  • Bartels C.J., Arnaiz-Seco J.I., Ruiz-Santa-Quitera A., Björkman C., Frössling J., von Blumröder D., Conraths F.J., Schares G., van Maanen C., Wouda W., Ortega-Mora L.M. 2006. Supranational comparison of Neospora caninum seroprevalences in cattle in Germany, The Netherlands, Spain and Sweden. Veterinary Parasitology, 137, 17-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar. 2005.12.016CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bártová E., Sedlak K., Budíková M. 2015. A study of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii antibody seroprevalence in healthy cattle in the Czech Republic. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, 22, 32-34Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bień J., Moskwa B., Bogdaszewski M., Cabaj W. 2012. Detection of specific antibodies anti-Neospora caninum in the fallow deer (Dama dama). Research in Veterinary Science, 92, 96-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.10.014CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bień J., Moskwa B., Cabaj W. 2010. In vitro isolation and identification of the first Neospora caninum isolate from European bison (Bison bonasus bonasus L.). Veterinary Parasitology, 173, 200-205. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.06.038CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Cabaj W., Choromański L., Rodgers S., Moskwa B., Malczewski A. 2000. Neospora caninum infections in dairy cows with abortion in Poland. Acta Parasitologica, 45, 113-114Google Scholar

  • Cabaj W., Moskwa B., Pastusiak K., Gill J. 2005. Antibodies to Neospora caninum in the blood of European bison (Bison bonasus bonasus L.) living in Poland. Veterinary Parasitology, 128, 163-168Google Scholar

  • Cameron A.R., Baldock F.C. 1998. A new probability formula for surveys to substantiate freedom from disease. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 34, 1-17Google Scholar

  • Čobádiová A., Víchová B., Majláthová V., Reiterová K. 2013. First molecular detection of Neospora caninum in European brown bear (Ursus arctos). Veterinary Parasitology, 197, 346-349. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.05.005CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Czopowicz M., Kaba J., Szaluś-Jordanow O., Nowicki M., Witkowski L., Frymus T. 2011. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum infections in goats in Poland. Veterinary Parasitology, 178, 339-341. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.01.039CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dubey J.P. 2003. Review of Neospora caninum and neosporosis in animals. Korean Journal of Parasitology, 41, 1-16Google Scholar

  • Goodswen S.J., Kennedy P.J., Ellis J.T. 2013. A review of the infection, genetics, and evolution of Neospora caninum: from the past to the present. Infection, Genetics and Evolution, 13, 133-150. DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2012.08.012Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goździk K., Jakubek E.B., Björkman C., Bień J., Moskwa B., Cabaj W. 2010. Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum in free living and farmed red deer (Cervus elaphus) in Poland. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 13, 117-120Google Scholar

  • Goździk K., Grono K. 2009. Neosporosis as an abortion cause in cattle. Magazyn Weterynaryjny, 18, 230-234 Google Scholar

  • Goździk K., Grono K. 2010. Neospora caninum - a dangerous parasite responsible for abortion in dairy cattle. Magazyn Weterynaryjny. Choroby bydła - Monografia, 1030-1033Google Scholar

  • Goździk K., Wrzesień R., Wielgosz-Ostolska A., Bień J., Kozak- Ljunggren M., Cabaj W. 2011. Prevalence of antibodies against Neospora caninum in dogs from urban areas in Central Poland. Parasitology Research, 108, 991-996. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-010-2143-0CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Hornok S., Edelhofer R., Hajtos I. 2006. Seroprevalence of neosporosis in beef and dairy cattle breeds in Northeast Hungary. Acta Veterinaria Hungarica, 54, 485-491Google Scholar

  • Machačová T., Bártová E., Di Loria A., Sedlák K., Guccione J., Fulgione D., Veneziano V. 2013. Seroprevalence and risk factors of Neospora spp. in donkeys from Southern Italy. Veterinary Parasitology, 198, 201-204. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.08.013CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Moskwa B., Goździk K., Bień J., Kornacka A., Cybulska A., Reiterova K., Cabaj W. 2014. Detection of antibodies to Neospora caninum in moose (Alces alces): the first report in Europe. Folia Parasitologica, 61, 34-36Google Scholar

  • Płoneczka K., Mazurkiewicz M. 2008. Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum in dogs in south-western Poland. Veterinary Parasitology, 153, 168-171. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.01.007CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reichel M.P., Alejandra Ayanegui-Alcérreca M., Gondim L.F., Ellis J.T. 2013. What is the global economic impact of Neospora caninum in cattle - the billion dollar question. International Journal of Parasitology, 43, 133-142. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara. 2012.10.022CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Reiterová K., Spilovská S., Antolová D., Dubinský P. 2009. Neospora caninum, potential cause of abortions in dairy cows: the current serological follow-up in Slovakia. Veterinary Parasitology, 159, 1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.10.008Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sergeant E.S.G. 2015. Epitools epidemiological calculators. AusVet Animal Health Services and Australian Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre for Emerging Infectious Disease. Available at: http://epitools.ausvet.com.au Google Scholar

  • Thrusfield M. 2005. Veterinary epidemiology. 3rd ed., Blackwell Publishing Ltd. p. 230, 238-240, 245Google Scholar

  • Tomczuk K., Radzikowski A.B., Studzińska M.B., Witkowska A., Puchalski A. 2007. Antibodies to Neospora caninum in sera of cows from medium and small farms near Lublin. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska Lublin-Polonia, LXII, 50-53Google Scholar

  • Wapenaar W., Barkema H.W., Vanleeuwen J.A., McClure J.T., O’Handley R.M., Kwok O.C., Thulliez P., Dubey J.P., Jenkins M.C. 2007. Comparison of serological methods for the diagnosis of Neospora caninum infection in cattle. Veterinary Parasitology, 143, 166-173. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.08.007 CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2015-04-02

Revised: 2015-08-24

Accepted: 2015-08-31

Published Online: 2015-12-30

Published in Print: 2016-01-01


Citation Information: Acta Parasitologica, ISSN (Online) 1896-1851, ISSN (Print) 1230-2821, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ap-2016-0006.

Export Citation

© 2016. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in