Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Apeiron

A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science

Ed. by Wildberg, Christian / Morison, Benjamin

Online
ISSN
2156-7093
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 52, Issue 2

Issues

Wrong Turns in the Euthyphro

Paul Woodruff
Published Online: 2018-06-16 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron-2018-0011

Abstract

No Socratic theory of forms is implied by the questions Socrates asks in Plato’s Euthyphro. His questions appear to commit him to the existence of a certain kind of paradigm form in the Euthyphro, but there is no place for such a form in his philosophy, and that is a good thing, for such a form cannot exist. As stated, the main question does not have an answer, but it is reasonable for Socrates to ask it in the context of Euthyphro’s claims. if they could be supported, Socrates’ question would have an answer. But Euthyphro’s claims are not supportable. The turn toward a paradigm form for piety is a wrong turn; the turn toward the part-whole relation is another. Piety cannot be a proper part of justice on any view that is plausibly Socratic. Piety concerns the whole of virtue in a way that distinguishes it from primary virtues such as justice, and this point prepares the way for Socrates’ defense in the Apology.

Keywords: socrates; piety; service to the gods; nurture of the soul; socratic ignorance

References

  • Allen, R. E. 1970. Plato’s ‘Euthyphro’ and the Earlier Theory of Forms. London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

  • Allen, R. E. 1971. Plato’s Earlier Theory of Forms. In The Philosophy of Socrates., edited by G. Vlastos, 319–334Google Scholar

  • Burnyeat, M.F. 1971. Virtues in Action. In The Philosophy of Socrates., edited by G. Vlastos, 209–234.Google Scholar

  • Bussanich, John, and Nicholas D Smith. 2013. The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

  • Garver, Eugene. 2014. “Euthyphro Prosecutes a Human Rights Violation.” Philosophy and Literature 38, 510–527.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kahn, C. 1996. Plato and the Socratic Dialogue; the Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1797/1996. The Metaphysics of Morals, edited by M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • McPherran, Mark. 2013. “Socratic Theology and Piety.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates, edited by J. Bussanich and N.D. Smith, 257–275.Google Scholar

  • Meineck, P. 2007. “Sophocles: Ajax.” In Sophocles: Four Tragedies, P. Meineck and P. Woodruff, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar

  • Nehamas, Alexander. 1975. “Confusing Universals and Particulars in Plato’s Early Dialogues.” The Review of Metaphysics 29, 287–306.Google Scholar

  • Nehamas, Alexander. 1998. “Confusing Universals and Particulars in Plato’s Early Dialogues.” In his Virtues of Authenticity, 159–175. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Prior, W.J. 1985. Unity and Development in Plato’s Metaphysics. La Salle: Open Court Publishing Company.Google Scholar

  • Prior, W.J. 2004. “Socrates Metaphysician.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 27, 1–14.Google Scholar

  • Prior, W.J. 2013. “Socratic Metaphysics.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates, edited by J. Bussanich and N.D. Smith, 68–93.Google Scholar

  • Reeve, C.D.C. 2002. The Trials of Socrates. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar

  • Roochnik, David. 1996. Of Art and Wisdom: Plato’s Understanding of Techne. State College: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

  • Santas, G. X. 1979. Socrates: Philosophy in Plato’s Early Dialogues. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

  • Silverman, A. 2002. The Dialectic of Essence: A Study of Plato’s Metaphysics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Smith, Nicholas. 2014. “Socratic Metaphysics?.” Apeiron 47, 419–434.Google Scholar

  • Vasiliou, I. 2008. Aiming at Virtue in Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Vlastos, Gregory ed. 1971. The Philosophy of Socrates. Garden City: Doubleday and Company, Inc.Google Scholar

  • Vlastos, Gregory. (1972). “The Unity of the Virtues in the ‘Protagoras’.” Review of Metaphysics 25 (3):415–458.Google Scholar

  • Vlastos, Gregory. 1991. Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

  • Wildberg, Christian. 1999. “Piety as Service, Epiphany as Reciprocity: Two Observations on the Religious Meaning of the Gods in Euripides.” Illinois Classical Studies 24/25, 235–256.Google Scholar

  • Woodruff, Paul. 1977. “Socrates on the Parts of Virtue.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 2, New Essays on Plato and the Pre-Socratics, edited by R.A. Shiner and J. King-Farlow, 101–116.Google Scholar

  • Woodruff, Paul. 1978. “Socrates on Ontology: The Evidence of the Hippias Major.” Phronesis XXIII, 101–117.Google Scholar

  • Woodruff, Paul. 2014. Reverence: Renewing a Forgotten Virtue. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-06-16

Published in Print: 2019-04-24


Citation Information: Apeiron, Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages 117–136, ISSN (Online) 2156-7093, ISSN (Print) 0003-6390, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron-2018-0011.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in