Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Apeiron

A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science

Ed. by Wildberg, Christian / Morison, Benjamin

Online
ISSN
2156-7093
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Ahead of print

Issues

The Soul and Personal Identity in Early Stoicism: Two Theories?

Aiste Celkyte
Published Online: 2017-09-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron-2017-0038

Abstract

This paper is dedicated to exploring the alleged difference between Cleanthes’ and Chrysippus’ accounts of the post-mortal survival of the souls and the conceptions of personal identity that these accounts underpin. I argue that while Cleanthes conceptualised the personal identity as grounded in the rational soul, Chrysippus conceptualised it as the being an embodied rational soul. I also suggest that this difference between the two early Stoics might have been due to his metaphysical commitments arising from his response to the Growing Argument put forth by the Academics rather than the critique of his teacher.

Keywords: stoicism; soul; identity; immortality

References

  • Algra, K. 2009. “Stoics on Souls and Demons: Reconstructing Stoic Demonology.” In Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy, edited by D. Frede and B. Reis, 359–388. Berlin: Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Arnim, H. F. A. V. 1903–1924. Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta, Vol. 3. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

  • Bénatouïl, T. 2005. “Force, fermeté, froid: la dimension physique de la vertu stoïcienne.” Philosophie Antique 5:5–30.Google Scholar

  • Bett, R. 2012. Sextus Empiricus: Against the Physicists. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar

  • Bobzien, S. 1998. Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar

  • Bowin, J. 2003. “Chrysippus’ Puzzle about Identity.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 24:239–251.Google Scholar

  • Cherniss, H. 1976. “Plutarch.” In Moralia, Volume XIII. Part 2: Stoic Essays, eds. T. Page, T. Capps, W. Rouse, L. Post, and E. Warmington. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Chiesara, M. L. 2001. Aristocles of Messene: Testimonia and Fragments. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar

  • Cooper, J. M. 2009. “Chrysippus on Physical Elements.” In God and Cosmos in Stoicism, edited by R. Salles, 93–117. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar

  • Edelstein, L., and I. G. Kidd, ed. 1989. Posidonius, vol. 1: The Fragments, 2nd ed. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar

  • Gill, C. 2006a. The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar

  • Gill, C. 2006b. “Psychophysical Holism in Stoicism and Epicureanism.” In Common to Body and Soul: Philosophical Approaches to Explaining Living Behaviour in Greco-Roman Antiquity, edited by R. A. H. King, 209–231. Berlin: Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Gourinat, J.-B. 2007. “Akrasia and Enkrateia in Ancient Stoicism: Minor Vice and Minor Virtue?” In Akrasia in Greek Philosophy: From Socrates to Plotinus, edited by C. Bobonich and P. Destrée, 215–248. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

  • Gourinat, J.-B. 2009. “Stoics on Matter and Prime Matter.” In God and Cosmos in Stoicism, edited by R. Salles, 46–69. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar

  • Graver, M. 2002. Cicero on The Emotions: Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

  • Graver, M. 2007. Stoicism and Emotion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Hicks, R. 1924. Diogenes Laertius: Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hoven, R. 1971. Stoïcisme et Stoïciens face au problème de l’au-delà. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

  • Inwood, B. 2014. “Walking and Talking: Reflections on Divisions of the Soul in Stoicism.” In Partitioning the Soul: Debates from Plato to Leibniz, Topoi: Berlin Studies of the Ancient World, Vol. 22, edited by K. Corcilius and D. Perler, 63–84. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Ju, A. E. 2009. “Stoic and Posidonian Thought on the Immortality of Soul.” The Classical Quarterly 59 (1):112–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lewis, E. 1988. “The Stoic Theory of Mixture.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 35 (1):84–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lewis, E. 1995. “The Stoics on Identity and Individuation.” Phronesis 40 (1):89–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Long, A., and D. Sedley, ed. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers, Vol. 2 . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar

  • Long, A. A. 1982. “Soul and Body in Stoicism.” Phronesis 27 (1):34–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mansfeld, J. 2016. “Theodoret of Cyrrhus’s Therapy of Greek Diseases as a source of the Aëtian Placita.” Studia Philonica Annual 28:151–168.Google Scholar

  • Menn, S. 1999. “The Stoic Theory of Categories.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17:215–247.Google Scholar

  • Nolan, D. 2006. “Stoic Gunk.” Phronesis 51 (2):162–183.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rapp, C. 2006. “Interaction of Body and Soul: What the Hellnistic Philosophers Saw and Aristotle Avoided.” In Common to Body and Soul: Philosophical Approaches to Explaining Living Behaviour in Greco-Roman Antiquity, edited by R. A. H. King, 187–208. Berlin: Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Rist, J. M. 1977. “Zeno and Stoic Consistency.” Phronesis 22 (2):161–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Salles, R. 2009. “Chrysippus on Conflagration and the Indestructability of the Cosmos.” In God and Cosmos in Stoicism, edited by R. Salles, 118–134. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar

  • Schofield, M. 2013. “Cardinal Virtues: A Contested Socratic Inheritance.” In Plato and the Stoics, edited by A. Long, 11–28. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar

  • Sedley, D. 1982. “The Stoic Criterion of Identity.” Phronesis 27 (3):255–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sedley, D. 2003. “The school, from Zeno to Arius Didymus.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by B. Inwood, 7–32. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar

  • Sorabji, R. 1988. Matter, Space and Motion: Theories in Antiquity and Their Sequel. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

  • Tieleman, T. 1991. “Diogenes of Babylon and Stoic Embryology. Ps. Plutarch, “Plac.” V. 15.4 Reconsidered.” Mnemosyne 44 (Fasc. ½):106–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vogt, K. M. 2009. “Sons of the Earth: Are the Stoics Metaphysical Brutes?” Phronesis 54 (2):136–154.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wachsmuth, C., and O. Hense. 1884–1912. Ioannis Stobaei Anthologium, Vol. 5. Berolini: Apud Weidmannos.Google Scholar

  • White, M. J. 2003. “Stoic Natural Philosophy (Physics and Cosmology).” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by B. Inwood, 124-152. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-09-13


Citation Information: Apeiron, ISSN (Online) 2156-7093, ISSN (Print) 0003-6390, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron-2017-0038.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in