Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Apeiron

A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science

Ed. by Wildberg, Christian / Morison, Benjamin

Online
ISSN
2156-7093
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Ahead of print

Issues

The Good-Directedness of Τέχνη and the Status of Rhetoric in the Platonic Dialogues

Emily Hulme Kozey
Published Online: 2018-10-16 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron-2017-0072

Abstract

Does a τέχνη, qua τέχνη, need to be good-directed? On the basis of the Gorgias, many scholars have thought the answer is yes; I argue here to the contrary. There are, of course, many beneficial τέχναι, such as medicine and weaving; and there are even unconditionally good τέχναι, like the πολιτικὴ τέχνη; but Plato also happily construes piracy as a τέχνη in the Sophist, and, more normally, all sorts of neutral practices as τέχναι (e.g., drama). In order to make this argument, I provide a taxonomy of the different kinds of τέχναι and demonstrate that, across the corpus, there does not seem to be a good-directedness requirement. I then address the evidence of the Gorgias, where most commentators find a connection between τέχνη and good-directedness. I argue that this interpretation is incorrect, and that rhetoric in fact fails to be a τέχνη in the Gorgias solely because it is unable to give a rational account. A close reading of the Gorgias shows that this is a plausible interpretation, and comparison with the Phaedrus reinforces the point: in both dialogues, whether rhetoric will be a τέχνη or not hinges only on the question of rationality, not a good-directedness condition.

Keywords: techne; rhetoric; Gorgias; Plato

All translations are my own unless otherwise noted. Abbreviations of authors and works are those of the Oxford Classical Dictionary, 4th ed.

References

  • Baker, S. H. 2015. “The Concept of Ergon: Towards an Achievement Interpretation of Aristotle’s ‘Function Argument’.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy XLVIII: 227–66.Google Scholar

  • Balansard, A. 2001. Technè dans les Dialogues de Platon: l’empreinte de la sophistique. Sankt Augustin: Academia.Google Scholar

  • Cooper, J. 1999. “Socrates and Plato in Plato’s Gorgias.” In Reason and Emotion, 29–75. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Coulton, J. J. 1977. Ancient Greek Architects at Work. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

  • Dodds, E. R. 1959. Plato: Gorgias. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Doyle, J. 2010. “Socrates and Gorgias.” Phronesis 55 (1): 1–25.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Franklin, L. 2005. “Technē and Teleology in Plato’s Gorgias.” Apeiron 38 (4): 229–55.Google Scholar

  • Hemmenway, S. R. 1999. “The Techne-Analogy in Socrates’ Healthy City: Justice and the Craftsman in the Republic.” Ancient Philosophy 19 (2): 267–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Irwin, T. 1977. Plato’s Moral Theory: The Early and Middle Dialogues. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Irwin, T. 1979. Plato: Gorgias. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Irwin, T. 1995. Plato’s Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Jones, R. E., and R. Sharma. 2017. “The Wandering Hero of the Hippias Minor: Socrates on Virtue and Craft.” Classical Philology 112 (2): 113–37. Doi: .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kahn, C. H. 1983. “Drama and Dialectic in Plato’s Gorgias.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy I: 75–121.Google Scholar

  • Levy, D. 2005. “Technē and the Problem of Socratic Philosophy in the Gorgias.” Apeiron 38 (4): 185–227.Google Scholar

  • Nussbaum, M. C. 1986. The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Pelosi, F. 2017. “Against Musical ἀτεχνία: Papyrus Hibeh I 13 and the Debate on τέχνη in Classical Greece.” Apeiron 50 (3): 393–413.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Pollitt, J. J. 1974. The Ancient View of Greek Art. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

  • Roochnik, D. 1996. Of Art and Wisdom: Plato’s Understanding of Techne. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

  • Russell, D. 2005. Plato on Pleasure and the Good Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Sedley, D. 2009. “Myth, Punishment and Politics in the Gorgias.” In Plato’s Myths, edited by C. Partenie, 51–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Sørensen, A. D. 2016. “Scientific Politics and the Power of the People: Rhetoric and Technē in the Gorgias.” In Plato on Democracy and Political Technē, 35–62. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

  • Sprague, R. 1976. Plato’s Philosopher-King: A Study of the Theoretical Background. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar

  • Tiles, J. E. 1984. “Technē and Moral Expertise.” Philosophy 59 (227): 49–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Warren, E. 1989. “The Craft Argument: An Analogy?.” In Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy III: Plato, edited by J. Anton and A. Preus, 101–15. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

  • Woodruff, P. 1990. “Plato’s Early Theory of Knowledge.” In Epistemology, edited by S. Everson, 60–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Woolf, R. 2004. “Why Is Rhetoric Not a Skill?.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 21 (2): 119–30.Google Scholar

  • Yunis, H. 2011. Plato: Phaedrus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-10-16


Citation Information: Apeiron, ISSN (Online) 2156-7093, ISSN (Print) 0003-6390, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron-2017-0072.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in