Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Apeiron

A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science

Ed. by Wildberg, Christian / Morison, Benjamin

Online
ISSN
2156-7093
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Ahead of print

Issues

Between Rhetoric and Sophistry: The Puzzling Case of Plato’s Gorgias

Jacqueline Tusi
Published Online: 2019-03-07 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron-2018-0099

Abstract

The case of Gorgias’ profession has been an object of ongoing dispute among scholars. This is mainly because in some dialogues Plato calls Gorgias a rhetorician, in others a sophist. The purpose of this article is to show that a solution only emerges in the Gorgias, where Plato presents Gorgias’ goals as a rhetorician and its associated arts. On this basis, Plato introduces a systematic division between genuine arts and fake arts, including rhetoric and sophistry, thereby identifying their conceptual differences and similarities. The paper concludes by arguing that Gorgias can be called both a rhetorician and a sophist, provided that the labeling is done from different perspectives.

Keywords: Gorgias; Rhetoric; Sophistry

References

  • Arends, F. 2007. “Why Socrates Came Too Late for Gorgias’ Epideixis: Plato’s Gorgias as Political Philosophy.” In Gorgias-Menon Selected Papers from the Seventh Symposium Platonicum, edited by M. Erler, and L. Brisson, 52–56. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Bona, G. 1974. “Λόγος e ἀλήθεια nell Encomio di Elena di Gorgia.” Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 102:5–33.Google Scholar

  • Buchheim, T. 1989. Gorgias von Leontinoi. Reden, Fragmente und Testimonien. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Calogero, G. 1932. Studi sull’eleatismo. Roma: Tipografia del Senato.Google Scholar

  • Canto-Sperber, M. 2007. Platon. Gorgias. Paris: GF Flammarion.Google Scholar

  • Dalfen, J. 2004. Platon. Gorgias. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

  • De Romilly, J. 1988. Les grands sophistes dans l’Athènes de Périclès. Paris: Éditions de Fallois.Google Scholar

  • Desclos, M.-L. 2009. Les Sophistes, I. Protagoras, Gorgias, Antiphon, Xéniade, Lycophron, Prodicos, L’Anonyme De Jamblique, Critias. Paris: GF Flammarion.Google Scholar

  • Diels, H. 1976. “Gorgias und Empedokles.” In Sophistik, edited by C.J. Classen, 351–83. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

  • Diels, H., and W. Kranz. 1951. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar

  • Dilman, I. 1979. Morality and the Inner Life. A Study in Plato’s Gorgias. London/Basingstole: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar

  • Dodds, E. R. 1959. Plato. Gorgias. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary. Reprinted 1976. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Duchemin, J. 1943. “Remarques sur la composition du Gorgias.” Revue des Études Grecques 56:265–86.Google Scholar

  • Dupréel, E. 1948. Les Sophistes. Protagoras. Gorgias. Prodicus. Hippias. Reprinted 1980. Neuchâtel: Éditions du Griffon.Google Scholar

  • Franklin, L. 2005. “Techne and Teleology in Plato’s Gorgias.” Apeiron 38:229–55.Google Scholar

  • Gomperz, H. 1912. Sophistik und Rhetorik. Das Bildungsideal des ΕΥ ΛΕΓΕΙΝ in seinem Verhältnis zur Philosophie des V. Jahrhunderts, Leipzig/Berlin: Teubner.Google Scholar

  • Graham, D. W. 1991. “Socrates, the Craft Analogy, and Science.” Apeiron 24:1–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gulick, C. B. 1933. Athenaeus. The Deipnosophists. Vol. 5. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. London: W. Heinemann.Google Scholar

  • Guthrie, W. K. C. 1969. A History of Greek Philosophy. The Fifth-Century Elightenment. Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Harrison, E. L. 1964. “Was Gorgias a Sophist?.” Phoenix 18:183–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hartmann, L. 2017. Die grosse Rede des Timaios – Ein Beispiel wahrer Rhetorik? Zu Theorie und Praxis philosophischer Rhetorik in Platons Dialogen Gorgias, Phaidros und Timaios. Basel: Schwabe Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Hildebrandt, K. 1983. Platon. Gorgias. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar

  • Irani, T. 2017. Plato on the Value of Philosophy. The Art of Argument in the Gorgias and Phaedrus. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar

  • Irwin, T. 1979. Plato. Gorgias. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Kahn, C. 1996. Plato and the Socratic Dialogue. The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kerferd, G. B. 1981. The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Klosko, G. 1984. “The Refutation of Callicles in Plato’s Gorgias’.” Greece & Rome 31:126–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Levy, D. 2005. “Techne and the Problem of Socratic Philosophy in the Gorgias.” Apeiron 38:185–227.Google Scholar

  • Moravczik, J. 2007. “Goodness Trumps Pleasure-Loving in the Gorgias.” In Gorgias-Menon. Selected Papers from the Seventh Symposium Platonicum, edited by M. Erler, and L. Brisson, 122–27. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Newiger, H.-J. 1973. Untersuchungen zu Gorgias’ Schrift Über das Nichtseiende. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Pinjuh, J.-M. 2014. Platons Hippias Minor. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.Google Scholar

  • Renaud, F. 2001. “La rhétorique socratico-platonicienne dans le Gorgias de Platon.” In Philosophie antique. Problèmes, Renaissance, Usages, edited by A. Laks, and M. Narcy, 65–86. Villeneuve d’Ascq Cedex: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar

  • Robinson, R. 1953. Plato’s Earlier Dialectic, 2nd. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Roochnik, D. L. 1986. “Socrates’s Use of the Techne-Analogy.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 24:295–310.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ross, D. 1974. Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici Elenchi. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Segal, C. P. 1962. “Gorgias and the Psychology of the Logos.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 66:99–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sidgwick, H. 1872. “The Sophists.” The Journal of Philology 4:288–307.Google Scholar

  • Sprague, R. K. 1972. The Older Sophists. A Complete Translation by Several Hands of the Fragments in Die Fragmente Der Vorsokratiker, Edited by Diels-Kranz. With A New Edition of Antiphon and of Euthydemus. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar

  • Vickers, B. 1989. In Defence of Rhetoric. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Von Arnim, H. 1898. Leben und Werke des Dion von Prusa. Mit einer Einleitung: Sophistik, Rhetorik, Philosophie. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-03-07


Citation Information: Apeiron, ISSN (Online) 2156-7093, ISSN (Print) 0003-6390, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron-2018-0099.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in