Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

arcadia

International Journal of Literary Culture / Internationale Zeitschrift für literarische Kultur

Ed. by Biti, Vladimir / Liska, Vivian


CiteScore 2018: 0.12

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.122
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.329

Print + Online
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 51, Issue 1

Issues

Recent Theories and Debates about Evolution and the Arts: A Critical Review

John Neubauer
Published Online: 2016-06-07 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/arcadia-2016-0002

Works Cited

  • Abbott, H. Porter. “Introduction.” SubStance 30.1–2 (2001): 3–5.Google Scholar

  • Barkow, Jerome, Leda Cosmides, and John Toby, eds. The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York: Oxford UP, 1992.Google Scholar

  • Bloch, Maurice. “A Well-Disposed Social Anthropologist’s Problems with Memes.” Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science. Ed. Robert Aunger. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2000. 189–204.Google Scholar

  • Bortolotti, Gary R., and Linda Hutcheon. “On the Origin of Adaptations: Rethinking Fidelity Discourse and ‘Success’ – Biologically.” New Literary History 38 (2007): 443–58.Google Scholar

  • Boyd, Brian. “Evolutionary Theories of Art.” The Literary Animal. Evolution and the Nature of Narrative. Eds. Jonathan Gottschall and David Sloan Wilson. Evanston, IL: Northwestern UP, 2005. 147–76.Google Scholar

  • Boyd, Brian. On the Origin of Stories: Evolution, Cognition and Fiction. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Boyd, Brian. Why Lyrics Last: Evolution, Cognition, and Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Boyd, Brian, Joseph Carroll, and Jonathan Gottschall, eds. Evolution, Literature, and Film: a Reader. New York: Columbia UP, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Boyd, Robert, and Peter J. Richerson. Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1985.Google Scholar

  • Buller, David J. Adapting Minds: evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human nature. Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT P, 2005.Google Scholar

  • Carroll, Joseph. Evolution and Literary Theory. Columbia: U of Missouri P, 1995.Google Scholar

  • Carroll, Joseph. Literary Darwinism: Evolution, Human Nature, and Literature. New York: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Chomsky, Noam. Rules and Representations. Oxford: Blackwell, 1980.Google Scholar

  • Confer, Jaime C., et al. “Evolutionary Psychology: Controversies, Questions, Prospects, and Limitations.” American Psychologist 65 (2010): 110–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Darwin, Charles. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: Murray, 1871.Google Scholar

  • Darwin, Charles. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. London: Murray, 1872.Google Scholar

  • Dawkins, Richard. The Selfish Gene. 1976. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1989.Google Scholar

  • Deacon, Terrence W. “Beyond the Symbolic Species.” The Symbolic Species Evolved. Eds. Theresa Schilhab, Frederik Stjernfelt, and Terrence Deacon. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2012. 9–38.Google Scholar

  • Deacon, Terrence W. “The Symbol Concept.” The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution. Eds. Maggie Tallerman and Kathleen R. Gibson. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2001. 393–405.Google Scholar

  • Deacon, Terrence W. The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Human Brain. New York: Norton; London: Allen Lane, 1997.Google Scholar

  • Dennett, Daniel C. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1995.Google Scholar

  • Dutton, Denis. The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure, and Human Evolution. Oxford: Oxford UP,2009.Google Scholar

  • Fletcher, Angus. “Another Literary Darwinism.” Critical Inquiry 40 (2014): 450–69.Google Scholar

  • Gottschall, Jonathan. Literature, Science and a New Humanities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Gottschall, Jonathan, and David Sloan Wilson, eds. The Literary Animal. Evolution and the Nature of Narrative. Evanston, IL: Northwestern UP, 2005.Google Scholar

  • Gould, Stephen Jay. Full House: The Spread of Excellence from Plato to Darwin. New York: Harmony Books, 1997. 219–20.Google Scholar

  • Gould, Stephen Jay. “More Things in Heaven and Earth.” Alas, Poor Darwin. Arguments against Evolutionary Psychology. Eds. Hilary Rose and Steven Rose. New York: Harmony, 2000. 85–105.Google Scholar

  • Gould, Stephen Jay. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2002.Google Scholar

  • Grunberg, Arnon. Het bestand. Amsterdam: Nijgh & Van Ditmar, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Hamilton, William D. “The genetical evolution of social behaviour I.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 7.1 (July 1964): 1–16.Google Scholar

  • Hamilton, William D. “The genetical evolution of social behaviour II.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 7.1 (July 1964): 17–52.Google Scholar

  • Hernadi, Paul. “Literature and Evolution.” SubStance 30. 1–2 (2001): 55–71.Google Scholar

  • Hutcheon, Linda. A Theory of Adaptation. New York: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar

  • Huxley, Julian S. Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. 1942. Cambridge, MA: MIT P, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Kramnick, Jonathan. “Against Literary Darwinism.” Critical Inquiry 37 (2011): 315–47.Google Scholar

  • Kramnick, Jonathan. “A Reply to my Critics.” Critical Inquiry 38 (2012): 431–60.Google Scholar

  • Lewens, Tim. “Cultural Evolution: Integration and Skepticism.” The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science. Ed. Harold Kincaid. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Moretti, Franco. Graphs, Maps, Trees. Abstract Models for Literary History. London: Verso, 2005.Google Scholar

  • Moretti, Franco. The Way of the World: the Bildungsroman in European Culture. London: Verso, 1987.Google Scholar

  • Pinker, Steven. The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Viking, 2002.Google Scholar

  • Pinker, Steven. How the Mind Works. New York: Norton, 1997.Google Scholar

  • Pinker, Steven. “Toward a Consilient Study of Literature.” Philosophy and Literature 31 (2007): 162–78.Google Scholar

  • Prendergast, Christopher. “Evolution and Literary History: A Response to Franco Moretti.” New Left Review 34.4 (2005): 40–62.Google Scholar

  • Ramachandran, V. S. “Mirror Neurons and Imitation Learning as the driving force behind ‘the Great Leap Forward’ in Human Evolution.” 2001. Edge 69 (June 1st, 2000). <www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge69.html.> Oct. 22nd, 2015.

  • Richardson, Alan. The Neural Sublime: Cognitive Theories and Romantic Texts. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Richerson, Peter J., and Robert Boyd. Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2005.Google Scholar

  • Richerson, Peter J., and Morten H. Christiansen, eds. Cultural Evolution: Society, Technology, Language, and Religion. Cambridge, MA: MIT P, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Spencer, Herbert. “The Origin and Function of Music.” Fraser’s Magazine 56 (1857). Essays: Scientific, Political and Speculative. Vol. 2. London: Williams and Norgate, 1878. 2nd ed. 1891. 400–51.Google Scholar

  • Spolsky, Ellen. “Darwin and Derrida: Cognitive Literary Theory as a Species of Post-Structuralism.” Introduction to Cognitive Cultural Studies. Ed. Lisa Zunshine. Baltimore: John Hopkins UP, 2010. 292–310.Google Scholar

  • Spolsky, Ellen. Gaps in Nature. Literary Interpretation and the Modular Mind. Albany: SUNY P, 1993.Google Scholar

  • Tappert, Wilhelm. Wandernde Melodien. Eine musikalische Studie. 1868. 2nd ed. Berlin: Brachvogel & Ranft, 1889.Google Scholar

  • Tomlinson, Gary. “Evolutionary Studies in the Humanities: The Case of Music.” Critical Inquiry 39 (2013): 647–75.Google Scholar

  • Tooby, John, and Leda Cosmides. “Does Beauty Build Adapted Minds? Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Aesthetics, Fiction and the Arts.” SubStance 30.1–2 (2001): 6–27.Google Scholar

  • Turner, Frederick. Natural Classicism. Essays on Literature and Science. New York: Paragon P, 1985.Google Scholar

  • Waal, Frans de. The Age of Empathy: Nature’s Lesson for a Kinder Society. New York: Harmony, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Wellek, René. “The Concept of Evolution in Literary History.” 1956. Concepts of Criticism. Ed. Stephen G. Nichols. New Haven: Yale UP, 1963. 37–53.Google Scholar

  • Wellek, René. A History of Modern Criticism 1750–1950. Vol. 3. The Age of Transition. London: Jonathan Cape, 1964.Google Scholar

  • Wellek, René. Theory of literature. London: Jonathan Cape, 1949.Google Scholar

  • Wells, H. G., Julian S. Huxley, and G. P. Wells, The Science of Life. 1929. New York, 1934.Google Scholar

  • Wilson, David Sloan. Does Altruism Exist?: Culture, Genes, and the Welfare of Others. New Haven: Yale UP, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Wilson, David Sloan. “Evolution and Social Constructivism.” Evolution, Literature, and Film: a Reader. Eds. Brian Boyd, Joseph Carroll, and Jonathan Gottschall. New York: Columbia UP, 2010. 111–22.Google Scholar

  • Wilson, David Sloan. “Evolutionary Social Constructivism.” The Literary Animal. Evolution and the Nature of Narrative. Eds. Jonathan Gottschall and David Sloan Wilson. Evanston, IL: Northwestern UP, 2005. 29.Google Scholar

  • Wilson, Edward O. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Wilson, Edward O. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. 1975. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2000.Google Scholar

  • Wilson, David Sloan, and Edward O. Wilson. “Rethinking the Theoretical Foundation of Sociobiology.” The Quarterly Review of Biology 82.4 (Dec. 2007): 327–48.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2016-06-07

Published in Print: 2016-06-01


Citation Information: arcadia, Volume 51, Issue 1, Pages 3–21, ISSN (Online) 1613-0642, ISSN (Print) 0003-7982, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/arcadia-2016-0002.

Export Citation

© 2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in