Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

arcadia

International Journal of Literary Culture / Internationale Zeitschrift für literarische Kultur

Ed. by Biti, Vladimir / Liska, Vivian


CiteScore 2018: 0.12

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.122
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.329

Online
ISSN
1613-0642
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 54, Issue 2

Issues

Liberal Nomos, National Narrative: Karl Kraus’s Critique of Law

Gal Hertz
  • Corresponding author
  • Tel Aviv University, Cohn Institute for History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas, P. O. Box 39040, Tel Aviv6997801, Israel
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2019-11-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/arcadia-2019-0020

Abstract

The critique of law and judicial practice is a central theme in Karl Kraus’s oeuvre. However, it is mostly understood by scholars as – to use Robert Cover’s terms – addressing law as nomos (what law says) rather than as narrative (its normative grounding). This article claims that the narratival critique of law, which Kraus develops via Shakespeare, Goethe, and other literary sources, should not be seen as a merely aesthetic complement to his legal arguments, but rather as essential to his approach to jurisprudence and social justice. This view challenges a non-critical application of pre-given values and fixated norms, since such practice undermines contingent moral concerns and often leads to social harm. From this perspective, this analysis shows how Kraus captures and documents the historical political transition of the Habsburg Monarchy, in which criminalization was put to use as a political tool, as a liberal institution co-opted by national discourse and populist ideology.

Keywords: Karl Kraus; law and literature; narrative; normativity; moral panic; jurisprudence; liberalism; Vienna 1900

Works Cited

  • Adorno, Theodor W. “Sittlichkeit und Kriminalität.” Noten zur Literatur. Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp, 1966. 57–82.Google Scholar

  • Beller, Steven. The Habsburg Monarchy – 1815–1914. Cambridge UP, 2018. Google Scholar

  • Beller, Steven, ed. Rethinking Vienna 1900. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2001.Google Scholar

  • Benedikt, Edmund. “Wochenschau.” Juristische Blätter 33 (1904): 148–9. Google Scholar

  • Boyer, John W. Culture and Political Crisis in Vienna. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1995.Google Scholar

  • Cassata, Francesco. Building the New Man: Eugenics, Racial Science and Genetics in Twentieth-Century Italy. Budapest: Central European UP, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Cohen, Stanley. Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers. London and New York: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

  • Cover, Robert. Narrative, Violence and the Law – the Essays of Robert Cover. Ann Arbor, MI: U of Michigan P, 1993. Google Scholar

  • Cover, Robert M. “The Supreme Court, 1982 Term – Foreword: Nomos and Narrative.” Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 2705 (1983), digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2705. Accessed 30 August 2019.

  • Evans, Richard J. The German Underworld: Deviants and Outcasts in German History. London: Routledge, 1988.Google Scholar

  • Foucault, Michel. “About the Concept of the ‘Dangerous Individual’ in 19th-Century Legal Psychiatry.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 1.1 (1978): 1–18.Google Scholar

  • Friedman, Lawrence M. “Lexitainment – Legal Process as Theater.” DePaul Law Review 50.2 (2000): 539–58.Google Scholar

  • Hall, Stuart, et al. Policing the Crisis. London: Macmillan, 1978. Google Scholar

  • Hertz, Gal. “From Epistemology of Suspicion to Racial Profiling: Hans Gross, Mobility and Crime around 1900.” Transfers (2019). In print.Google Scholar

  • Höbelt, Lothar. Kornblume und Kaiseradler: Die deutschfreiheitlichen Parteien Altösterreichs 1882–1918. Vienna: Verlag für Geschichte und Politik, 1993.Google Scholar

  • Judson, Pieter M. The Habsburg Empire – A New History. Cambridge, MA, and London: The Belknap P of Harvard UP, 2016. Google Scholar

  • Judson, Pieter M. “Rethinking the Liberal Legacy.” Rethinking Vienna 1900. Ed. Steven Beller, 2001. 57–80.Google Scholar

  • Kersten, Joachim, and Friedrich Pfäfflin, eds. Detlev von Liliencron entdeckt, gefeiert und gelesen von Karl Kraus. Wallstein: Göttingen, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Kraus, Karl. “Antworten des Herausgebers.” Die Fackel 116 (1902): 22–3.Google Scholar

  • Kraus, Karl. “Desertion in den Tod.” Die Fackel 426–430 (1916): 89.Google Scholar

  • Kraus, Karl. “Erpressung.” Die Fackel 159 (1904): 1–17.Google Scholar

  • Kraus, Karl. “Der Fall Hervay.” Sittlicheit und Kriminalität. München: Kösel Verlag, 1970. 100–1.Google Scholar

  • Kraus, Karl. “Der Hexenprozeß von Leoben.” Sittlicheit und Kriminalität. München: Kösel Verlag, 1970. 112–31.Google Scholar

  • Kraus, Karl. In Selbstzeugnissen und Bilddokumenten. Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1978.Google Scholar

  • Kraus, Karl. “Der Koprophor.” Die Fackel 56 (1900): 11–2.Google Scholar

  • Kraus, Karl. “Prozeß Veith.” Die Chinesische Mauer. München: Albert Langen Verlag, 1964. 9–34.Google Scholar

  • Kraus, Karl. “Sittlichkeit und Kriminalität.” Sittlichkeit und Kriminalität. München: Kösel Verlag, 1970. 10–28.Google Scholar

  • Kraus, Karl. Die Sprache. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 1987.Google Scholar

  • Kraus Karl. “Der Sündenpfuhl.” Die Chinesische Mauer. München: Albert Langen Verlag, 1964. 45–52. Google Scholar

  • Kraus, Karl. “Das technoromantische Abenteuer.” Die Fackel 462–471 (1918). 171.Google Scholar

  • Kraus, Karl. “Ein Unhold.” Sittlicheit und Kriminalität. München: Kösel Verlag, 1970. 42–52.Google Scholar

  • Kraus, Karl. “Zwei Urteile.” Sittlichkeit und Kriminalität. München: Kösel Verlag, 1970. 72–5. Google Scholar

  • Kwan, Jonathan. Liberalism and the Habsburg Monarchy, 1861–1895. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Lammasch, Heinrich. “Ruskin.” Die Fackel 31–32 (1900): 6–9.Google Scholar

  • Lammasch, Heinrich. “Ziele der Strafrechtsreform.” Allgemeine Österreichische Gerichts-Zeitung 36–38 (1904): 303.Google Scholar

  • Lethen, Helmut. Cool Conduct – The Culture of Distance in Weimar Germany, Berkley: U California Press, 2002. Google Scholar

  • Linden, Ari. “Wo Ungesetz gesetzlich überwaltet: Karl Kraus’s Reading of National Socialism.” Oxford German Studies 46:1 (2017): 75–91. Google Scholar

  • Liszt, Franz von. Das Problem der Kriminalität der Juden. Gießen: Alfred Töpelmann Verlag, 1907.Google Scholar

  • Masferrer, Aniceto. The Western Codification of Criminal Law: A Revision of the Myth of its Predominant French Influence. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2018.Google Scholar

  • Menne, Jonas. Lombroso Redivivus. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Merkel, Reinhard. Strafrecht und Satire im Werk von Karl Kraus. Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Müller-Dietz, Heinz. “Kriminalität und Krminalitätverarbeitung in der ‘Fackel’.” Erzählte Kriminalität. Ed. Jörg Schönert. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1991.Google Scholar

  • Musil, Robert. The Man without Qualities. Vol. 1. A Sort of Introduction. London: Secker & Warburg, 1979.Google Scholar

  • Olson, Greta. “The Turn to Passion: Has Law and Literature become Law and Affect?” Law & Literature 28.3 (2016): 335–53.Google Scholar

  • Pamberton, Simon A. Harmful Societies: Understanding Social Harm. Croydon: Policy Press, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Ribeiro, Antonio S. “Karl Kraus und Shakespeare. Die Macht des Epigonen.” Karl Kraus: Diener der Sprache – Meister des Ethos. Ed. Joseph Strelka. Tübingen: Francke Verlag, 1990. 237–65.Google Scholar

  • Rose, Alison. Antisemitism, Gender Bias and the Hervay Affair of 1914. Maryland: Lexington Books, 2016. Google Scholar

  • Scherr, Johannes. Deutsche Kultur- und Sittengeschichte, Stuttgart : Schuler Verlag 1948. Google Scholar

  • Schmidt, Eberhard. Straftrecht und Kulturkrise. Leipzig: J. C. B. Mohr, 1931. Google Scholar

  • Schorske, Carl E. Fin-de-Siècle Vienna: Politics and Culture. New York: Vintage Books, 1981.Google Scholar

  • Schorske, Carl E. Thinking With History. New Jersey: Princeton Legacy Library, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Shadel, James. “Fin de Siècle or Jahrhundertwende? – The Question of an Austrian Sonderweg.” Steven Beller, ed., Rethinking Vienna 1900. 80–104.Google Scholar

  • Shakespeare, William. Measure for Measure. Ed. N. W. Bawcutt. New York: Oxford UP, 1991.Google Scholar

  • Simon, Jürgen. Kriminalbiologie und Zwangsterilisation, Münster: Waxmann, 1997.Google Scholar

  • Slaughter, Joseph R. Human Rights, Inc. New York: Fordham University P, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Slaughter, Joseph R. “Vanishing View Points: When Narrative is Not Simply There.” Journal for Human Rights 9 (2010): 207–23.Google Scholar

  • Spector, Scott. Violent Sensations – Sex, Crime & Utopia in Vienna and Berlin. U of Chicago P, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Vyleta, Daniel M. Crime, Jews and News: Vienna 1895–1914. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Weininger, Otto. Geschlecht und Charakter. Vienna and Leipzig: Wilhelm Braumüller, 1903. Google Scholar

  • Wetzell, Richard F. Inventing the Criminal. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 2000.Google Scholar

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Notebooks 1914–1916. Ed. G. H. von Right. New York: Harper, 1961. Google Scholar

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1956.Google Scholar

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Zettel. Ed. G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Right. Oxford : B. Blackwell 1967.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-11-08

Published in Print: 2019-11-07


Citation Information: arcadia, Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages 167–195, ISSN (Online) 1613-0642, ISSN (Print) 0003-7982, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/arcadia-2019-0020.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in