Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Archiv für Religionsgeschichte

Ed. by Bickel, Susanne / Frankfurter, David / Johnston, Sarah Iles / Pironti, Gabriella / Rüpke, Jörg / Scheid, John / Várhelyi, Zsuzsanna

Together with Beard, Mary / Bonnet, Corinne / Borgeaud, Philippe / Henrichs, Albert / Knysh, Alexander / Lissarrague, Francois / Malamoud, Charles / Maul, Stefan / Parker, Robert C. Y. / Shaked, Shaul / Stroumsa, Gedaliahu Guy / Tardieu, Michel / Volokhine, Youri

CiteScore 2018: 0.26

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.132
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.435

See all formats and pricing
More options …

Anthropomorphism, Theatre, Epiphany: From Herodotus to Hellenistic Historians

Renée Koch Piettre
Published Online: 2018-03-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/arege-2018-0012


This paper argues that, beginning with the Euripidean deus ex machina, dramatic festivals introduced a new standard into epiphanic rituals and experience. Through the scenic double énonciation, gods are seen by mythical heroes as gods, but by the Athenian spectators as costumed actors and fictive entities. People could scarcely believe these were ‘real’ gods, but would have no doubt been impressed by the scenic machinery. Thus the Homeric theme of a hero’s likeness to the gods developed into the Hellenistic theme of the godlike ruler’s (or actor’s) theatrical success (or deceit). So in the Athenians’ Hymn to Demetrius Poliorcetes, a victorious ruler entering a city is welcomed as a better god than the gods themselves. The simultaneous rise in popularity of paradoxical stories and experiences in the Hellenistic period was grounded not in believing, but in disbelieving – a phenomenon associated with antiquarian interests, the self-publicity of religious sanctuaries, or amazed credulity. People were increasingly drawn to ‘real’ gods, leading to long pilgrimages and extensive financial outlay (in the mysteries) in order to see them. I investigate this phenomenon by focusing upon fragments of the ‘mimetic’ or ‘tragic’ Greek historians that survive from this period.


  • Africa, T. W. 1960. “Phylarchus and the Gods. The Religious Views of a Hellenistic Historian”, Phoenix 14. 222 – 227.Google Scholar

  • Back, F. C. 1883. De Graecorum caerimoniis in quibus homines deorum vice fungebantur. Berlin: Dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Bettini, M. (ed.) 1991. La Maschera, il doppio e il ritratto. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar

  • Borgeaud, Ph. 1979. Recherches sur le dieu Pan. Rome-Genève: Droz.Google Scholar

  • Calame, C. 1991. “Quand dire c’est faire voir: l’évidence dans la rhétorique antique”, Études de lettres 4. 3 – 22.Google Scholar

  • Calame, C. 2001. “Quelques formes chorales chez Aristophane: adresses aux dieux, mimésis dramatique et ‘performance’ musicale.” In Chanter les dieux. Musique et religion dans l’Antiquité grecque et romaine, ed. P. Brulé and Ch. Vendries. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes. 115 – 140.Google Scholar

  • Cancik, H. 1990. “Epiphanie/Advent”. In Handbuch religionswissenschaftlicher Grundbegriffe 2, ed. H. Cancik, B. Gladigow and M. Laubscher. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. 290 – 296.Google Scholar

  • Cancik, H.; Hitzl, K. (ed.) 2003. Die Praxis der Herrscherverehrung in Rom und seinen Provinzen. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar

  • Carpenter, T. H.; Faraone, C.A. (ed.) 1993. Masks of Dionysus. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

  • Carrière, J. C. 1999. “Prodige, stratagèmes et oracle dans la prise de pouvoir par Pisistrate (Hérodote, I, 59 – 65).” In Pouvoir, divination, prédestination dans le monde antique, ed. É. Smadja and É. Gény. Institut des sciences et techniques de l’Antiquité: Presses Universitaires Franc-Comtoises. 13 – 32.Google Scholar

  • Cerfaux, L.; Tondriau, J. 1957. Un concurrent du christianisme. Le culte des souverains dans la civilisation gréco-romaine. Paris-Tournai: Desclée.Google Scholar

  • Chaniotis, A. 1997. “Theatricality beyond the Theatre. Staging Public Life in the Hellenistic World.” In De la scène aux gradins. Théâtre et représentations dramatiques après Alexandre le Grand, ed. B. Le Guen. Pallas 47. 219 – 259.Google Scholar

  • Chiasson, C. C. 2003. “Herodotus’ Use of Attic Tragedy in the Lydian ‘logos’”, ClAnt 22.1. 5 – 35.Google Scholar

  • Connolly, A. 1998. “Was Sophocles Heroised as Dexion?”, JHS 118. 1 – 21.Google Scholar

  • Connor, W. R. 1987. “Tribes, Festivals and Processions. Civic Ceremonial and Political Manipulation in Archaic Greece”, JHS 107. 40 – 50.Google Scholar

  • Connor, W. R. 1989. “City Dionysia and Athenian Democracy”, C & M 40. 7 – 32.Google Scholar

  • Deubner, L. 1966. Attische Feste. Hildesheim: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft [Berlin 19321].Google Scholar

  • Easterling, P. E. 1988. “Tragedy and Ritual: ‘Cry “Woe, woe”, but may the god prevail’”, Metis 3 [1991]. 87 – 109.Google Scholar

  • Easterling, P. E. 1993. “Gods on Stage in Greek Tragedy.” In Religio graeco-romana: Festschrift für Walter Pötscher, ed. J. Dalfen et al. GB Suppl. V. Graz-Horn. 77 – 86.Google Scholar

  • Easterling, P. E. 1997. “A Show for Dionysus.” In The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy, ed. P.E. Easterling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 151 – 177.Google Scholar

  • Echols, E. C. 1961. Herodian of Antioch’s History of the Roman Empire. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

  • Else, G. 1957. “The Origin of ΤΡΑΓΩΙΔΙΑ”, Hermes 85. 269 – 297.Google Scholar

  • Fehling, D. 1989. Herodotus and His ‘Sources’. Citation, Invention, and Narrative Art, English transl. J. G. Howie. Liverpool: F. Cairns [19711].Google Scholar

  • Flory, S. 1987. The Archaic Smile of Herodotus. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar

  • Flückiger-Guggenheim, D. 1984. Göttliche Gäste. Die Einkehr von Göttern und Heroen in der griechischen Mythologie. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Fowler, R. 2003. “Herodotos and Athens.” In Herodotus and his World, ed. P. Derow and R. Parker. Oxford: Oxford UP. 305 – 318.Google Scholar

  • Friedrich, R. 1985. “Drama and Ritual.” In Themes in Drama V: Drama and Religion, ed. J. Redmond. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. 159 – 223.Google Scholar

  • Friedrich, R. 1996. “Everything to Do With Dionysos? (With the Answer of R. Seaford).” In Tragedy and the Tragic, ed. M.S. Silk. Oxford: Oxford UP. 25 – 38.Google Scholar

  • Frontisi-Ducroux, F. 1991. Le dieu-masque. Une figure du Dionysos d’Athènes. École Française de Rome: La Découverte.Google Scholar

  • Garland, R. 1992. Introducing New Gods. The Politics of Athenian Religion. London: Duckworth / Ithaca (N.Y.): Cornell UP.Google Scholar

  • Georgoudi, S. et al. (ed.) 2012. La raison des signes. Présages, rites, destin dans les sociétés de la Méditerranée ancienne. Leiden: Brill 2012.Google Scholar

  • Ginzburg, C. 1989. “Montrer et citer: la vérité dans l’Histoire”, Le Débat 56. 43 – 54.Google Scholar

  • Gladigow, B. 1985 – 1986. “Präsenz der Bilder, Präsenz der Götter”, Visible Religion 4 – 5. Approaches to iconology. 114 – 133.Google Scholar

  • Gladigow, B. 1990. “Epiphanie, Statuette, Kultbild. Griechische Gottesvorstellung im Wechsel von Kontext und Medium”, Visible Religion 7. 98 – 121.Google Scholar

  • Gordon, R. L. 1996. Image and Value in the Graeco-Roman World: Studies on Mithraism and Religious Art. Aldershot-Brookfield: Variorum.Google Scholar

  • Gould, J. 1994. “Religion in Herodotus.” In Greek Historiography, ed. S. Hornblower. Oxford: Oxford UP. 91 – 106.Google Scholar

  • Gradel, I. 2002. Emperor Worship and Roman Religion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Green, P. 1990. From Alexander to Actium: The Hellenistic Age. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar

  • Habicht, Chr. 1970. Gottmenschentum und griechische Städte [19561]. München: Beck.Google Scholar

  • Harrison, T. 2000. Divinity and History. The Religion of Herodotus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Henrichs, A. 1990. “Between City and Country: Cultic Dimensions of Dionysos in Athens and Attica.” In Cabinet of the Muses. Festschrift T. Rosenmeyer, ed. M. Griffith, D. J. Mastronarde. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press. 255 – 277.Google Scholar

  • Henrichs, A. 1993. “Gods in Action: The Poetics of Divine Performance in the Hymns of Callimachus.” In Callimachus, ed. M.A. Harder et al. Groningen: E. Forsten. 127 – 147.Google Scholar

  • Higbie, C. 2003. The Lindian Chronicle and the Greek Creation of their Past. Oxford-New York: Oxford UP.Google Scholar

  • How, W.W.; Wells, J. 1912. A Commentary on Herodotus, I.1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Jacoby, F. 1956. Abhandlungen zur griechischen Geschichtschreibung. Leiden: Bloch. 73 – 99 [Antike 2 (1926) 1 – 29].Google Scholar

  • Jouanna, J. 1992. “Libations et sacrifices dans la tragédie grecque”, REG 105. 406 – 434.Google Scholar

  • Kiechle, F.K. 1970. “Götterdarstellungen durch Menschen in den altmediterraneischen Religionen”, Historia 19. 259 – 271.Google Scholar

  • Kleinknecht, H. 1937. “Zur Parodie des Gottmenschentums bei Aristophanes”, ARW 34. 294 – 313.Google Scholar

  • Koch Piettre, R. 1996. “Le corps des dieux dans les épiphanies divines en Grèce ancienne.” Paris: doctorate thesis, Paris: EPHE.Google Scholar

  • Koch Piettre, R. 1998. “La proscynèse de Colotès: une lecture de Plutarque, Moralia 1117 b-f”, Lalies 18. 185 – 202.Google Scholar

  • Koch Piettre, R. 1999. “Les dieux crèvent les yeux: l’enargeia dans la représentation du divin”, Ateliers 21. La transmission de l’image dans l’Antiquité: Université Charles-de-Gaulle – Lille 3. 11 – 21.Google Scholar

  • Koch Piettre, R. 2001. “Images et perception de la présence divine en Grèce ancienne”, MEFRA 113/1. 211 – 224.Google Scholar

  • Koch Piettre, R. 2005a. Comment peut-on être dieu? La secte d’Épicure. Paris: Belin.Google Scholar

  • Koch Piettre, R. 2005b. “La Chronique de Lindos, ou comment accommoder les restes pour écrire l’Histoire.” In Les objets de la mémoire, ed. Ph. Borgeaud and Y. Volokhine. Studia Religiosa Helvetica 2004/05. Bern-Berlin: Peter Lang. 95 – 121.Google Scholar

  • Koch Piettre, R. 2005c. “‘Il faut faire les statues des dieux joyeuses et souriantes’: Diogène d’Œnoanda (fragment 19 Smith) en réformateur de la religion olympienne dans la Grèce d’époque romaine.” In L’idole dans l’imaginaire occidental, ed. R. Deconinck, M. Watthee-Delmotte. Paris: L’Harmattan. 95 – 108.Google Scholar

  • Lateiner, D. 1989. The Historical Method of Herodotus. Toronto-Buffalo-London: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

  • Leiris, M. 1989. La possession et ses aspects théâtraux chez les Éthiopiens de Gondar. Paris: Fata Morgana.Google Scholar

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. 1979. La Voie des masques. Paris: Plon [19751].Google Scholar

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. 1989. Des symboles et leurs doubles. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar

  • Lewis, S. 2004. “Καὶ σαφῶς τύραννος ἤν: Xenophon’s account of Euphron of Sicyon”, JHS 124. 65 – 74.Google Scholar

  • Longo, V. 1963. “Deus ex machina e religione in Euripide.” In Miscellanea N. Terzaghi. Genova: Istituto di filologia classica e medioevale. 237 – 248.Google Scholar

  • Lonsdale, S. H. 1993. Dance and Ritual Play in Greek Religion. Baltimore: John Hopkins UP.Google Scholar

  • Loraux, N. 1991. “Qu’est-ce qu’une déesse?” In Histoire des femmes I. L’Antiquité, ed. G. Duby; M. Perrot. Paris: Perrin. 31 – 62.Google Scholar

  • Mackey, J.L. 2006. “Saving the appearances: The Phenomenology of Epiphany in Atomist Theology. Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics, URL: www.princeton.edu/~pswpc/pdfs/mackey/050601.pdf.

  • Manni, E. 1952. Demetrio Poliorcete. Roma: Signorelli.Google Scholar

  • Marasco, G. 1980. “Filarco e la religione.” Miscellanea in onore di Eugenio Manni IV. Roma: Bretschneider. 1389 – 1402.Google Scholar

  • Marasco, G. 1981. “Introduzione alla biografia plutarchea di Demetrio”, Sileno 7. 35 – 70.Google Scholar

  • Mastrocinque, A. 1979. “Demetrios tragodoumenos (propaganda e letteratura al tempo di Demetrio Poliorcete)”, Athenaeum 57. 260 – 276.Google Scholar

  • Mastronarde, D.J. 1990. “Actors on High: The Skene Roof, the Crane, and the Gods in Attic Drama”, ClAnt 9. 247 – 294.Google Scholar

  • Maurizi, N. 2003. “A propositi di oracoli e manifestazione prodigiose nel racconto erodoteo sulla tirannide pisistratide.” In L’uso dei documenti nella storiografia antica, ed. A.M. Biraschi. Università di Perugia: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane. 205 – 231.Google Scholar

  • Meyer, E. 1899. Forschungen zur alten Geschichte II. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

  • Mikalson, J. D. 1991. Honor thy Gods: Popular Religion in Greek Tragedy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

  • Moles, J. 2002. “Herodotus and Athens.” In Brill’s Companion to Herodotus, ed. E.J. Bakker et al. Leiden: Brill. 33 – 52.Google Scholar

  • Mueller, E. 1910. De Graecorum deorum partibus tragicis. RGVV 8.3. Giessen: Töpelmann.Google Scholar

  • Newiger, H.-J. 1990. “Ekkyklema und Mechane in der Inszenierung des griechischen Dramas”, WürzJahrb 16. 33 – 42.Google Scholar

  • Nielsen, I. 2000. “Cultic Theatres and Ritual Drama in Ancient Greece”, Proceedings of the Danish Institute at Athens 3. 107 – 133.Google Scholar

  • Pax, E. 1962. “Epiphanie.” RAC V. Stuttgart. 832 – 909.Google Scholar

  • Pédech, P. 1984. Trois historiens méconnus. Théopompe, Duris, Phylarque. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

  • Peek, W. 1955. Griechische Vers-Inschriften I. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Pelling, C. 2002. Plutarch and History: Eighteen Studies. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar

  • Pernot, L.; Lévy, C. 1997. Dire l’évidence. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

  • Petridou, G. 2015. Divine Epiphany in Ancient Greek Literature and Culture. Oxford: Oxford UP.Google Scholar

  • Platt, V.J. 2011. Facing the Gods: Epiphany and Representation in Graeco-Roman Art, Literature and Religion. Greek Culture in the Roman World. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.Google Scholar

  • Préaux, Cl. 1978. Le Monde hellénistique. La Grèce et l’Orient, 323 – 146 av. J.-C., I. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

  • Price, S.F.R. 1984. “Gods and Emperors: The Greek Language of the Roman Imperial Cult”, JHS 104. 70 – 95.Google Scholar

  • Prier, R.A. 1989. Thauma Idesthai. The Phenomenology of Sight and Appearance in Archaic Greek. Tallahassee: Florida State UP.Google Scholar

  • Pritchett, W. K. 1979. The Greek State at War, Part III: Religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

  • Pritchett, W. K. 1993. The Liar School of Herodotos. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar

  • Pucci, P. 1994. “God’s Intervention and Epiphany in Sophocles”, AJPh 115. 15 – 46.Google Scholar

  • Raaflaub, K.A. 2002. “Philosophy, Science, Politics: Herodotus and the Intellectual Trends of his Time.” In Brill’s Companion to Herodotus, ed. E.J. Bakker et al. Leiden: Brill. 149 – 186.Google Scholar

  • Revermann, M. 2006. “The Competence of Theatre Audiences in Fifth- and Fourth-Century Athens”, JHS 126. 99 – 124.Google Scholar

  • Robert, L. 1960. “Sur un papyrus de Paris. Glossaire latin-grec”, Hellenica 11/12. 5 – 15.Google Scholar

  • Saïd, S. 2002. “Herodotus and Tragedy.” In Brill’s Companion to Herodotus, ed. E.J. Bakker et al. Leiden: Brill. 117 – 147.Google Scholar

  • Santoro, M. 2000. [Demetrio Lacone], [La forma del dio]: PHerc. 1055, edizione, traduzione e commento. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar

  • Scheer, T. S. 2000. Die Gottheit und ihr Bild: Untersuchungen zur Funktion griechischer Kultbilder in Religion und Politik. München: Beck.Google Scholar

  • Scott, K. 1928. “The Deification of Demetrius Poliorcetes”, AJPh 49. 137 – 166.Google Scholar

  • Seaford, R. 1981. “Dionysiac Drama and the Dionysiac Mysteries”, CQ 31. 252 – 275.Google Scholar

  • Shimron, B. 1989. Politics and Belief in Herodotus. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar

  • Sinos, R.H. 1993. “Divine Selection: Epiphany and Politics in Archaic Greece.” In Cultural Poetics in Archaic Greece. Cult, Performance, Politics, ed. C. Dougherty, L. Kurke. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. 73 – 91.Google Scholar

  • Slings, S.R. 2002. “Oral Strategies in the Language of Herodotus.” In Brill’s Companion to Herodotus, ed. E.J. Bakker et al. Leiden: Brill. 53 – 77.Google Scholar

  • Sourvinou-Inwood, C. 1997. “Tragedy and Religion: Constructs and Readings.” In Tragedy and the Historian, ed. C. Pelling. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 161 – 186.Google Scholar

  • Sourvinou-Inwood, C. 2003a. Tragedy and Athenian Religion. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

  • Sourvinou-Inwood, C. 2003b. “Herodotos (and others) on Pelasgians: Some Perceptions of Ethnicity.” In Herodotus and his World, ed. P. Derow, R. Parker. Oxford: Oxford UP. 103 – 144.Google Scholar

  • Stein, H. 1968. Herodotos. Erklärt von Heinrich Stein. Dublin-Zürich: repr. Weidmann [18831].Google Scholar

  • Strasburger, H. 19753. Die Wesenbestimmung der Geschichte durch die antike Geschichtsschreibung. Wiesbaden: Steiner (Studien II, 963 – 1016).Google Scholar

  • Tanner, J. 2006. The Invention of Art History in Ancient Greece: Religion, Society and Artistic Rationalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.Google Scholar

  • Thomas, R. 1992. Literacy and Orality in Ancient Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.Google Scholar

  • Thomas, R. 1993. “Performance and Written Publication in Herodotus and the Sophistic Generation.” In Vermittlung und Tradierung von Wissen in der griechischen Kultur, ed. W. Kullmann, J. Althoff. Script-Oralia, 61. Tübingen: Gunter Narr. 225 – 244.Google Scholar

  • Thomas, R. 2000. Herodotus in Context: Ethnography, Science, and the Art of Persuasion. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.Google Scholar

  • Toffin, G. 1999. “Possession, danses masquées et corps divin dans la vallée de Katmandou (Népal).” In La possession en Asie du Sud. Parole, corps, territoire, ed. J. Assayag, G. Tarabout. Paris: EHESS. Purusartha 21. 237 – 261.Google Scholar

  • Torraca, L. 1988. Duride di Samo. La maschera scenica nella storiografia ellenistica. Salerno: Laveglia.Google Scholar

  • Tuci, P.A. 2004. “Pisistrato e il ‘demos’: tentativi di manipolazione della voluntà popolare”, RIL 138. 133 – 170.Google Scholar

  • Turner, V. 1982. From Ritual to Theatre. The Human Seriousness of Play. New York: PAJ Publications.Google Scholar

  • Turner, V. 1986. The Anthropology of Performance. New York: PAJ Publications.Google Scholar

  • Ubersfeld, A. 1993. Lire le théâtre. Paris: Scandéditions/Éditions sociales.Google Scholar

  • Vernant, J.-P. 1981. “Le tyran boiteux: d’Œdipe à Périandre”, Le Temps de la réflexion 2. 235 – 255 (repr. J.-P. Vernant, P. Vidal-Naquet 1986. Œdipe et ses mythes. Paris: La Découverte. 54 – 78).Google Scholar

  • Vernant, J.-P. 1986a. “Corps obscur, corps éclatant.” In Corps des dieux, ed. Ch. Malamoud, J.-P. Vernant. Le Temps de la réflexion 7. 19 – 45.Google Scholar

  • Vernant, J.-P. 1986b. “Le Dionysos masqué des Bacchantes d’Euripide.” In Mythe et tragédie deux, ed. J.-P. Vernant, P. Vidal-Naquet. Paris: La Découverte. 237 – 270.Google Scholar

  • Wachsmuth, D. 1967. ΠΟΜΠΙΜΟΣ Ὁ ΔΑΙΜΩΝ. Untersuchung zu den antiken Sakrallandungen bei Seereisen. Berlin: Dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Weniger, L. 1923 – 1924. “Theophanien. Altgriechische Götteradvente”, ARW 22. 16 – 57.Google Scholar

  • Winkler, J.J.; Zeitlin, F.I. (ed.) 1989. Nothing To Do with Dionysos? Athenian Drama in its Social Context. Princeton: Princeton UP.Google Scholar

  • Zangara, A. 2007. Voir l'histoire: théories anciennes du récit historique IIe siècle avant J.-C. – IIe siècle après J.-C. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

  • Zanker, G. 1981. “Enargeia in the Ancient Criticism of Poetry”, RhM 124. 297 – 311.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-03-28

Citation Information: Archiv für Religionsgeschichte, Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 189–209, ISSN (Online) 1868-8888, ISSN (Print) 1436-3038, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/arege-2018-0012.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in