Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Archiv für Religionsgeschichte

Ed. by Bickel, Susanne / Frankfurter, David / Johnston, Sarah Iles / Pironti, Gabriella / Rüpke, Jörg / Scheid, John / Várhelyi, Zsuzsanna

Together with Beard, Mary / Bonnet, Corinne / Borgeaud, Philippe / Henrichs, Albert / Knysh, Alexander / Lissarrague, Francois / Malamoud, Charles / Maul, Stefan / Parker, Robert C. Y. / Shaked, Shaul / Stroumsa, Gedaliahu Guy / Tardieu, Michel / Volokhine, Youri


CiteScore 2018: 0.26

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.132
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.435

Online
ISSN
1868-8888
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Double Vision: Epiphanies of the Dioscuri in Classical Antiquity

Verity J. Platt
Published Online: 2018-03-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/arege-2018-0014

Abstract:

The Dioscuri – Castor and Pollux – are among the most epiphanic of gods, frequently appearing in battle or to sailors struggling at sea. On Chios, a festival called the Theophania was founded in the third century BC to commemorate an epiphany of the twin gods. Indeed, their appearance at the Sicilian battle of the River Sagra c. 540 BC was so well known in Greek – and Roman – culture that it was invoked as a proverbial example of epiphanic manifestation in Cicero’s De natura deorum (2.1.13); as such, it was the model for several Graeco-Roman battle epiphanies featuring the Dioscuri and their horses, from Postumius’ victory at Lake Regillus in 496 BC to Constantine’s at the Milvian Bridge in AD 312. The numerous battle epiphanies of antiquity have been gathered and assessed by previous scholars (Pfister 1924 and Pritchett 1979). This article posits a new approach to the material, arguing that, because of their fame and ubiquity, epiphanies of the Dioscuri provided a model through which to explore both the validity and visual authority of divine manifestation. The conjuring of divine presence through the physical semeia of the gods is also an important element of the portrayal of the Dioscuri in image form. Representations of these epiphanic gods cover a spectrum of iconicity, ranging from highly anthropomorphized ‘re-enactments’ of their epiphanies (such as the sculptures set up in the Roman forum to commemorate the Lake Regillus victory) to metonymic denotations of their presence in the form of their polos hats, and sub-iconic depictions of twin stars. This combination of corporeal and cosmic semeia provides a sophisticated commentary upon the cognitive dilemmas raised by epiphany: what kind of bodies do the gods have, how do they reveal these forms to mortals, and how are we to recognize and identify them? As deities defined by dualism – mortals and immortals, gods and heroes, men and stars – the Dioscuri provide a particularly potent model for exploring such issues, for both ancient thinkers and modern scholars of epiphany.

Bibliography

  • Algra, K. 2003. ‘Stoic Theology,’ in B. Inwood (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge: 65 – 66.Google Scholar

  • Aravantinos, M. B. 1994. ‘L’iconografia dei Dioscuri in Grecia,’ in Nista (ed.): 8 – 25.Google Scholar

  • Arias, P. E. 1980. ‘L’arte locrese nelle sue principali manifestazioni artigianali. Terrecotte, bronzi, vasi, arti minori,’ in Locri Epizefiri. Atti del 16° Convegno Internazionale di Studi sulla Magna Grecia (Taranto 1976). Naples: 479 – 579.Google Scholar

  • Back, F. 1883. De Graecorum caeremoniis in quibus homines deorum vice fungebantur. Berlin.Google Scholar

  • Beacham, R.C. 1999. Spectacle Entertainments of Early Imperial Rome. New Haven and London.Google Scholar

  • Beard, M. 2003. ‘The Triumph of the Absurd: Roman Street Theatre,’ in C. Edwards and G. Woolf (eds.), Rome the Cosmopolis. Cambridge: 21 – 43.Google Scholar

  • Beard, M. 2012. ‘Cicero’s “Response of the haruspices” and the Voice of the Gods,’ JRS 102: 20 – 39.Google Scholar

  • Bicknell, P. 1966. ‘The Date of the Battle of the Sagra River,’ Phoenix 20.4: 294 – 301.Google Scholar

  • Boardman, J. 1972. ‘Herakles, Peisistratos and Sons,’ RA 1: 57 – 72.Google Scholar

  • Bravo, J. 2004. ‘Heroic Epiphanies: Narrative, Visual, and Cultic Contexts,’ Illinois Classical Studies 29: 63 – 84.Google Scholar

  • Bremer, J. M.; Furley, W. D. 2001. Greek Hymns. Selected Cult Songs from the Archaic to the Hellenistic Period. Tübingen, 2 vols.Google Scholar

  • Brenk, F. E. 1977. In Mist Apparelled: Religious Themes in Plutarch’s Moralia and Lives. Leiden.Google Scholar

  • Bruit, L. 1989. ‘Les dieux au festins des mortels. Théoxènes et xeniai’, in A.-F. Laurens (ed.), Entre homes et dieux. Le convive, le héros, le prophète. Paris: 12 – 25.Google Scholar

  • Bruit, L.; Lissarrague, F. 2004. ‘Banquets des dieux’, Thesaurus Cultum et Rituum Antiquorum 2. V. Lambrinoudakis and J. Ch. Balty (eds.). Los Angeles: 220 – 229.Google Scholar

  • Burkert, W. 1985. Greek Religion (tr. J. Raffan). Oxford.Google Scholar

  • Carson, A. 1999. The Economy of the Unlost: Reading Simonides of Ceos with Paul Celan. Princeton.Google Scholar

  • Castagnoli, F. 1959. ‘Dedica arcaica lavinate a Castore e Polluce,’ StMatStorRel 30: 109 – 117.Google Scholar

  • Castagnoli, F. 1983. ‘L’introduzione del culto dei Dioscuri nel Lazio,’ StRom 31: 3 – 12.Google Scholar

  • Chaniotis, A. 2005. War in the Hellenistic World. A Social and Cultural History. Oxford.Google Scholar

  • Clarke, G. W. 1968. ‘The Dioscuri of the Lacus Iuturnae’, Latomus 27: 147 – 148.Google Scholar

  • Coarelli, F. 1976. ‘Architettura e arti figurative a Roma 150 – 50 a.C.,’ in P. Zanker (ed.), Hellenismus in Mittelitalien I. Göttingen: 21 – 51.Google Scholar

  • Coarelli, F. 1977. ‘Arte ellenistica e arte romana: la cultura figurative in Roma tra II e I secolo a.C.,’ in Caratteri dell’ ellenismo nelle urne etrusche (Prospettiva Suppl. 1). Florence: 35 – 40.Google Scholar

  • Connelly, J.B. 2007. Portrait of a Priestess. Women and Ritual in Ancient Greece. Princeton.Google Scholar

  • Connor, W. R. 1987. ‘Tribes, Festivals and Processions: Civic Ceremonial and Political Manipulation in Archaic Greece,’ JHS 107: 40 – 50.Google Scholar

  • Cook, A. B. 1914 – 40. Zeus. A Study in Ancient Religion. Cambridge. 3 vols.Google Scholar

  • Cumont, F. 1942. Recherches sur le symbolisme funéraires des romains. Paris.Google Scholar

  • Day, J. W. 2000. ‘Epigram and Reader. Generic Force as (Re‐)Activation of Ritual,’ in M. Depew and D. Obbink (eds.), Matrices of Genre. Authors, Canons, and Society. Cambridge, MA, and London: 37 – 57.Google Scholar

  • Dentzer, J.-M. 1982. Le motif du banquet couché dans le proche-orient et le monde grec du VIIe ai IVe siècle avant J.-C. BEFAR 246. Rome.Google Scholar

  • Donohue, A. A. 1988. Xoana and the Origins of Greek Sculpture. American Classical Studies 15. Atlanta.Google Scholar

  • Dragôna-Monachou, M. 1976. The Stoic Arguments for the Existence and the Providence of the Gods. Athens.Google Scholar

  • Dunbabin K. 1990. ‘Ipsa deae vestigia… Footprints Divine and Human on Graeco-Roman Monuments,’ JRA 3: 85 – 109.Google Scholar

  • Ekroth, G. 2002. The Sacrificial Rituals of Greek Hero-Cults in the Archaic to the Early Hellenistic Periods. Kernos Suppl. 12. Centre international d’étude de la religion grecque antique. Liège.Google Scholar

  • Elsner, J. 1996. ‘Image and Ritual: Reflections on the Religious Appreciation of Classical Art,’ Classical Quarterly 46.2: 515 – 531.Google Scholar

  • Elsner, J. 2000. ‘Between Mimesis and Divine Power: Visuality in the Greco-Roman World’, in R. Nelson (ed.) Visuality Before and Beyond the Renaissance. Chicago: 45 – 69.Google Scholar

  • Farrell, J. 1997. ‘The Phenomenology of Memory in Roman Culture,’ Classical Journal 92.4: 373 – 383.Google Scholar

  • Fearn, D. 2007. Bacchylides. Politics, Performance, Poetic Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar

  • Ferrari, G. 1994/1995. ‘Heracles, Pisistratus and the Panathenaea,’ Métis 9/10: 219 – 226.Google Scholar

  • Gaifman, M. 2008. ‘Visualized Rituals and Dedicatory Inscriptions on Votive Offerings to the Nymphs,’ Opuscula: Annual of the Swedish Institute at Athens and Rome, 1: 85 – 103.Google Scholar

  • Garbrah, K. 1986. ‘On the Θεοφάνεια in Chios and the Epiphany of Gods in War,’ ZPE 65: 207 – 210.Google Scholar

  • Geppert, S. 1996. Castor und Pollux: Untersuchung zu den Darstellungen der Dioskuren in der römischen Kaiserzeit. Münster.Google Scholar

  • Gernet, L. 1981. The Anthropology of Ancient Greece, transl. J. Hamilton and B. Nagy. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

  • Giangiulio, M. 1983. ‘Locri, Sparta, Crotone e le tradizioni leggendarie intorno alla battaglia di Sagra,’ MÉFRA 95 (1): 473 – 521.Google Scholar

  • Goldhill, S. 2006. ‘Artemis and Cultural Identity in Empire Culture. How to Think about Polytheism, Now?’, in D. Konstan (ed.), Greeks on Greekness. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society. Supplementary Volume. Cambridge: 112 – 161.Google Scholar

  • Goldhill, S.; Osborne, R. (eds.) 1999. Performance Culture and Athenian Democracy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • Guzzo, P. G. 1994. ‘I Dioscuri in Magna Grecia,’ in Nista (ed.): 26 – 31.Google Scholar

  • Harri, L. 1989. ‘Statuaria,’ in Steinby (ed.): 177 – 198.Google Scholar

  • Harrison, T. 2000. Divinity and History. The Religion of Herodotus. Oxford.Google Scholar

  • Haubold, J. 2007. ‘Athens and Aegina (5.82 – 9),’ in E. Irwin and E. Greenwood (eds.), Reading Herodotus. A Study of the Logoi in Book 5 of Herodotus' Histories. Cambridge: 226 – 244.Google Scholar

  • Hedreen, G. 2004. ‘The Return of Hephaistos, Dionysiac Processional Ritual and the Creation of a Visual Narrative,’ JHS 124: 38 – 64.Google Scholar

  • Hermary, A. 1986. ‘Dioskouroi,’ LIMC 3.1. Zurich and Munich.Google Scholar

  • Hornblower, S. 2001. ‘Epic and Epiphanies: Herodotus and the “New Simonides”’, in D. Boedeker and D. Sider (eds.), The New Simonides. Contexts of Praise and Desire. Oxford: 135 – 147.Google Scholar

  • Hunter, R. 1996. Theocritus and the Archaeology of Greek Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • Jameson, M. H. 1994. ‘Theoxenia,’ in R. Hågg (ed.), Ancient Greek Cult Practice from the Epigraphical Evidence. Stockholm: 35 – 57.Google Scholar

  • Jog, K.P. 2005. Aśvin: The Twin Gods in Indian Mythology, Literature and Art. Delhi.Google Scholar

  • Kavoulaki, A. 1999. ‘Processional Performance and the Democratic Polis,’ in Goldhill and Osborne (eds.): 293 – 320.Google Scholar

  • Klein, B. S. 2003. Not all Twins are Alike: Psychological Profiles of Twinship. Westport, Conn.Google Scholar

  • Koch Piettre, R. 1996. Le corps des dieux dans les epiphanies divines en Grèce ancienne. PhD Diss. École Pratique des Hautes Études, Paris.Google Scholar

  • Krentz, P.; Wheeler, E. L. 1994. Polyaenus. Strategems of Wars. 2 vols. Chicago.Google Scholar

  • Larson, J. 1995. Greek Heroine Cults. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

  • Larson, J. 2001. Greek Nymphs. Myth, Cult, Lore. Oxford.Google Scholar

  • Le Bœuffle, A. 1977. Les noms latins d’astres et de constellations. Paris.Google Scholar

  • Long, A. A. 1990. ‘Scepticism about Gods in Hellenistic Philosophy,’ in M. Griffith and D. J. Mastronarde (eds.), Cabinet of the Muses: Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer. Berkeley: 279 – 291.Google Scholar

  • Lorenz, T. 1992. ‘Die Epiphanie der Dioskuren,’ in H. Froning, T. Hölscher and H. Mielsch (eds.), Kotinos. Festschrift für Erika Simon. Mainz/Rheim: 114 – 122.Google Scholar

  • Lyons, D. 1996. Gender and Immortality: Heroines in Ancient Greek Myth and Cult. Princeton.Google Scholar

  • Meijer, P. A. 2007. Stoic Theology. Proofs for the Existence of the Cosmic God and of the Traditional Gods. Delft.Google Scholar

  • Nagy, G. 1990. Pindar's Homer. The Lyric Possession of an Epic Past. Baltimore.Google Scholar

  • Nenci, G. 1994. Herodoto. Le Storie Libro V: La revolta della Ionia. Verona.Google Scholar

  • Nielsen, I. 1994. ‘Il tempio del Foro Romano: l’età repubblicana,’ in Nista (ed.): 107 – 112.Google Scholar

  • Nielsen, I.; Zahle, J. 1985. ‘The Temple of Castor and Pollux on the Forum Romanum. Preliminary Report on the Scandinavian Excavations 1983 – 85,’ Acta Archaeologica 56: 1 – 29.Google Scholar

  • Nista, L. (ed.) 1994. CASTORES: L’immagine dei Dioscuri a Roma. 2 vols. Rome.Google Scholar

  • Ogden, D. 2004. Aristomenes of Messene: Legends of Sparta’s Nemesis. Swansea.Google Scholar

  • Parker, R. 1998. ‘Pleasing Thighs: Reciprocity in Greek Religion,’ in C. Gill, N. Postlethwaite and R. Seaford (eds.), Reciprocity in Ancient Greece. Oxford: 105 – 125.Google Scholar

  • Pelling, C. 2002. Plutarch and History: Eighteen Studies. London.Google Scholar

  • Petridou, G. 2016. Divine Epiphany in Greek Literature and Culture. Oxford.Google Scholar

  • Pfister, F. 1924. ‘Epiphanie,’ RE, Supplement IV: 277 – 323.Google Scholar

  • Piccaluga, G. 1980. ‘L’olocausta di Patrai,’ in J. Rudhart et al. (eds.), Le Sacrifice dans l’antiquité. Geneva, Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 27: 243 – 288.Google Scholar

  • Pirenne-Delforge, V. 2006. ‘Ritual Dynamics in Pausanias: the Laphria,’ in E. Stavrianopoulou, (ed.), Ritual and Communication in the Graeco-Roman World. Liège: 111 – 129.Google Scholar

  • Pirenne-Delforge, V. 2010. ‘Greek Priests and “Cult Statues”: In How Far Are They Necessary?,’ in J. Mylonopoulos (ed.), Divine Images and Human Imaginations in Ancient Greece and Rome. Leiden: 121 – 141.Google Scholar

  • Platt, V. J. 2004. Epiphany and Representation in Graeco-Roman Culture: Art, Literature, Religion. DPhil. Diss. Oxford.Google Scholar

  • Platt, V. J. 2011. Facing the Gods: Epiphany and Representation in Greco-Roman Art, Literature and Religion. Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • Platt, V. J. 2015. Epiphanies,’ in E. Eidinow and J. Kindt (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Greek Religion. Oxford University Press: 491 – 504.Google Scholar

  • Platt, V. J. 2016. Sight and the Gods: On the Desire to See Naked Nymphs,’ in M. Squire (ed.), Sight and the Ancient Senses. The Senses in Antiquity, Vol. 4. London: 169 – 187.Google Scholar

  • Platt, V. J. 2017. ‘Framing the Sacred,’ in V. Platt and M. Squire (eds.), The Frame in Classical Art: A Cultural History. Cambridge: 384 – 391.Google Scholar

  • Pomeroy, S. B. 2002. Spartan Women. Oxford.Google Scholar

  • Potter, D. 1994. Prophets and Emperors. Human and Divine Authority from Augustus to Theodosius. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

  • Pritchett, W. K. 1979. The Greek State at War: III. Religion. Berkeley.Google Scholar

  • Purvis, A. 2003. Singular Dedications. Founders and Innovators of Private Cults in Classical Greece. London.Google Scholar

  • Riddle, J. M. 1997. Eve’s Herbs: A History of Contraception and Abortion in the West. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

  • Rosenberger, V. 2010. ‘Die List und das Göttliche: Religion bei Polyän,’ in K. Brodersen (ed.), Polyainos. Neue Studien / Polyaenus. New Studies. Berlin: 133 – 148.Google Scholar

  • Rouse, W. H. D. 1902. Greek Votive Offerings: An Essay in the History of Greek Religion. Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • Salapata, G. 1993. ‘The Laconian Hero Reliefs in the Light of the Terracotta Plaques’, in O. Palagia and W. Coulson (eds.), Sculpture from Arcadia and Laconia: Proceedings of an International Conference held at the American School of Classical Studies in Athens, April 10 – 14, 1992. Oxford: 89 – 97.Google Scholar

  • Salapata, G. 1997. ‘Hero Warriors from Corinth and Lakonia,’ Hesperia 66: 245 – 260.Google Scholar

  • Sande, S. 1994. ‘Il tempio del Foro Romano: l’età Augustea,’ in Nista (ed.): 113 – 118.Google Scholar

  • Schauenburg, K. 1974. ‘Theoxenien auf einer schwarzfigurigen Olpe,’ in E. Akurgal and U. Bahadı Alkım (eds.) Mélanges Mansel I. Ankara: 101 – 117, 285 – 308.Google Scholar

  • Schofield, M. 1980. ‘Preconception, Argument, and God’, in M. Schofield, M. Burnyeat and J. Barnes (eds.), Doubt and Dogmatism. Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology. Oxford: 285 – 308.Google Scholar

  • Schwartz, H. 1996. The Culture of the Copy. Striking Likenesses, Unreasonable Facsimiles. New York.Google Scholar

  • Segal, N. L. 1999. Entwined Lives. Twins and What They Tell Us About Human Behavior. New York.Google Scholar

  • Sens, A. 1992. ‘Theocritus, Homer, and the Dioscuri: Idyll 22. 137 – 22,’ TAPA 122: 335 – 350.Google Scholar

  • Shapiro, H. A. 1999. ‘Cult Warfare: The Dioskouroi between Sparta and Athens,’ in R. Hågg (ed.), Ancient Greek Hero Cult. Proceedings of the Fifth International Seminar on Ancient Greek Cult. Stockholm: 99 – 107.Google Scholar

  • Sihvola, J. 1989. ‘Il culto dei Dioscuri nei suoi aspetti politici,’ in Steinby (ed.): 76 – 91.Google Scholar

  • Simon, E. 1970. ‘Review of H. Metzger, Recherches sur l’Imagerie Athénienne. Paris, 1965,’ Gnomon 42: 706 – 712.Google Scholar

  • Simon, E. 1983. Festivals of Attica: An Archaeological Commentary. Madison.Google Scholar

  • Sinos, R. H. 1993. ‘Divine Selection: Epiphany and Politics in Archaic Greece,’ in C. Dougherty and L. Kurke (eds.), Cultural Poetics in Archaic Greece: Cult, Performance, Politics. Cambridge: 73 – 91.Google Scholar

  • Sironen, T. 1989. ‘I Dioscuri nella letteratura romana,’ in Steinby (ed.): 92 – 109.Google Scholar

  • Slater, W. J. 1972. ‘Simonides’ House,’ Phoenix 26: 232 – 240.Google Scholar

  • Smith, W. (ed.) 1890 – 91. A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities, 3 vols. London, 3rd edition.Google Scholar

  • Speyer, W. 1980. ‘Die Hilfe und Epiphanie einer Gottheit, eines Heroen und eines Heiligen in der Schlacht’, in E. Dassmann and K. Suso Frank (eds.), Pietas. Festschrift für Bernhard Kötting. Münster: 55 – 77.Google Scholar

  • Steinby, M. (ed.) 1989. Lacus Iuturnae I. Rome.Google Scholar

  • Steinby, M. (ed.) 1996. Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae. 4 vols. Rome.Google Scholar

  • Tameanko, M. 1992. ‘The Silphium Plant: Wonder Drug of the Ancient World Depicted on Coins,’ Celator 6 (4): 26 – 28.Google Scholar

  • Tanner, J. 2006. The Invention of Art History in Ancient Greece. Religion, Society and Artistic Rationalisation. Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • Tatman, J. L. 2000. ‘Silphium, Silver and Strife: A History of Kyrenaika and its Coinage,’ Celator 15 (2): 23 – 24.Google Scholar

  • Vaidyanathan, K.R. 1982. Temples and Legends of Kerala. Bombay.Google Scholar

  • van Compernolle, R. 1969. ‘Aiax et les Dioscures au secours des Locriens’, in Hommages à M. Renard. Brussels: 733 – 766.Google Scholar

  • Van Straten, F. 1976. ‘Daikrates’ Dream. A Votive Relief from Kos, and Some Other kat’ onar Dedications,’ BABesch 51: 1 – 38.Google Scholar

  • Van Straten, F. 1993. ‘Images of Gods and Men in a Changing Society. Self-Identity in Hellenistic Religion,’ in A. W. Bulloch et al. (eds.), Images and Ideologies. Self-Definition in the Hellenistic World. Berkeley and Los Angeles: 248 – 264.Google Scholar

  • Versnel, H. S. 1987. ‘What Did Ancient Man See When He Saw A God? Some Reflections on Greco-Roman Epiphany’, in C. van der Plas (ed.), Effigies Dei. Leiden: 42 – 55.Google Scholar

  • Weinstock, S. 1960. ‘Two Archaic Inscriptions from Latium,’ JRS 50: 112 – 118.Google Scholar

  • Wildberg, C. 1999 – 2000. ‘Piety as Service, Epiphany as Reciprocity: Two Observations on the Religious Meaning of the Gods in Euripides’, Illinois Classical Studies 24 – 25: 235 – 256.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-03-28


Citation Information: Archiv für Religionsgeschichte, Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 229–256, ISSN (Online) 1868-8888, ISSN (Print) 1436-3038, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/arege-2018-0014.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in