Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Applied Research In Health And Social Sciences: Interface And Interaction

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2451-3091
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Facebook Phenomenon for Collaborative Learning for University Studies

Airina Volungevičienė / Margarita Teresevičienė / Kristina Mejerytė- Narkevičienė
Published Online: 2015-12-17 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/arhss-2015-0006

Abstract

This article defines the shift in the concept and conditions of collaborative learning for university studies using the social networking tool Facebook and discusses the collaborative learning effect in terms of using Open Educational Resources (OER), creating learning artefacts and new generic competence development. In order to evaluate students’ learning through collaboration in Facebook, qualitative research method and survey of generic competencies based on the Tuning project framework (2003) were used. The data was collected through focus group interviews and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. The qualitative research method was chosen because it provides information of how students collaborate and what experience they gained during the activities. First, Facebook online groups have been identified at three different levels at VMU. The Facebook first level group was the social networking of Vytautas Magnus University’s students and academic staff. The second level group was created for the department dealing with social sciences, and is called “Department of Social Science”. The third level group is “Education Service Management” within the Department of Education. The research was done at the third level group with the students of the “Education Service Management” study programme. As research results show, Facebook as a social network has been changing communication between students, by facilitating the exchange of information and knowledge. The research analyses Facebook in the context of undergraduate university studies, based upon the experience of Vytautas Magnus University (VMU) for using Facebook for university studies. It could be concluded that learning is about developing capabilities to think and to act. Learners using social networking tools for collaborative learning, act, provide feedback and peer-review, asses and rate information. Openness is based on the idea that knowledge is disseminated and shared freely for the benefit of society as a whole. University students collaborate online and learn by using and exchanging OER, as well as developing them as the artefacts of online collaborative learning. They influence task design by creating “educational resources” themselves.

Keywords: Collaborative learning; Facebook; University; Students; Studies

References

  • Arends, R., (1998). Mokomės mokytis. Vilnius: Margi raštai.Google Scholar

  • Akins, D. E., Brown, J. S., & Hammond, A. L. (2007). A Review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) Movement: Achievements, Challenges and New Opportunities. Available at http://tinyurl.com/2swqsg (Retrieved on 22/06/2015).Google Scholar

  • Bennet, B., Rolheser-Bennet, C., & Stevahn, L. (2000). Mokymasis bendradarbiaujant. Vilnius: Margi raštai.Google Scholar

  • Biocca, F., Burgoon, J., Harms, Ch., & Stoner, M. (2006). Criteria and scope conditions for a theory and measure of social presence. Media interface and network design Labs. Available at http://en.scientificcommons.org/frank_biocca (Retrieved on 22/06/2015).Google Scholar

  • Dillendbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., O'Malley, C. (1996) The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds.). Learning in Humans and Machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science. (pp. 189- 211). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar

  • Downes, S. (2006). Models for Sustainable Open Educational Resources. National Research Council Canada. Available at www.oecd.org/document/32/0,2340,en_2649_33723_36224352_1_1_1_1,00.html (Retrieved on 22/06/2015).Google Scholar

  • Tuning Educational Structures in Europe (2003). Final Report, Phase One Ed. Julia Gonzalez; Robert Wagenaar. University of Deusto. University of Groningen.Google Scholar

  • Fullan, M. (1993). Change Forces. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

  • Galbraith, M. (1995). Community-based organization and the delivery of lifelong learning opportunities. Washington, DC: SPONS AGENCY National Inst, on Postsecondary Education, Libraries, and Lifelong Learning (ED/OERI) , Google Scholar

  • OECD (2007). Giving Knowledge for Free: the Emergence of Open Educational Resources. Available at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/35/7/38654317.pdf (Retrieved on 22/06/2015).Google Scholar

  • Hiltz, S. R. (1998). Collaborative learning is asynchronous learning networks: Building learning. Available at http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/issue2/hiltz.htm (Retrieved on 22/06/2015).Google Scholar

  • Holland, D., Skinner, D., Lachicotte Jr., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (1991). Cooperative Learning : Increasing College Faculty Instructional Productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report 4, Washington, D. C.: George Washington University.Google Scholar

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (1987). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (3rd edition). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1987). Research Shows the benefits of adult cooperation. Educational Leadership, 45(3), 27-30.Google Scholar

  • Johnstone, S. (2005). Open educational resources serve the World. Educause Quarterly, 28(3), 15-18.Google Scholar

  • Kagan, S. (1988). Cooperative learning: Resources for Teachers. Riverside, CA: University of California.Google Scholar

  • Kalz, M., Specht, M., Nadolski, R., Bastiaens, Y., Leirs, N., & Pawlowski, J. (2010). OpenScout: Competence based management education with community-improved open educational resources. In: Halley et al. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 17th EDINEB Conference. Crossing Borders in Education and work-based learning (pp. 137- 146). Maastricht: FEBA ERD Press.Google Scholar

  • Leclercq, D., Poumay, M. (2005). The 8 Learning Events Model and its principles. Available at http://www.labset.net/media/prod/8LEM.pdf (Retrieved on 22/06/2015).Google Scholar

  • Ocker, R. J., & Yaverbaum G. (1999). Asynchronous computer-mediated communication versus face to face collaboration: Results on student learning, quality and satisfaction. Group Decision and Negotiation, 8, 427-440.Google Scholar

  • Panitz, T. (1997). The Case for Student Centred Instruction Via Collaborative Learning Paradigms. Available at http://home.capecod.net/~tpanitz/tedsarticles/coopbenefits.htm (Retrieved on 22/06/2015).Google Scholar

  • Redecker, Ch., Ala-Mutka K., Bacigalupo, M., Ferrari, A., & Punie, Y. (2009). Learning 2.0: The Impact of Web 2.0 Innovations on Education and Training in Europe. Final Report. JRS Scientific and Technical Report.Google Scholar

  • Slavin, R. E. (1991). Are cooperative learning and untracking harmful to the gifted? Response to Allan. Educational Leadership, 48(6), 68-71.Google Scholar

  • Smith, B. L., & MacGregor J.T. (1992). Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education. Washington, DC: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment, University Park, PA. Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-12-17

Published in Print: 2015-12-01


Citation Information: Applied Research In Health And Social Sciences: Interface And Interaction, Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 46–71, ISSN (Online) 1822-3338, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/arhss-2015-0006.

Export Citation

© 2015. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in