Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica

The Journal of Mendel University in Brno, Czech Republic

4 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1801-0571
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Effect of Salinity Stress on Yield, Component Characters and Nutrient Compositions in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) Genotypes

Rameeh Valiollah
Published Online: 2013-07-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ats-2013-0010

Abstract

Crops growing in salt-affected soils may suffer from physiological drought stress, ion toxicity, and mineral deficiency which then lead to reduced growth and productivity. Eight rapeseed genotypes were evaluated at control and two salinity levels of irrigation, i.e. ECe=0 dS m-1 (control), 6 and 12 dS m-1. A factorial experiment based on completely randomized design with 4 replications was considered for evaluation of 24 treatments. Significant mean square of the salinity levels and genotypes were exhibited for 1000-seed weight, pod length, seed yield, Mg, K and Cl, indicating significant differences of genotypes for the traits at three salinity levels. Pods per plant and Mg had lowest variations among the genotypes at the high salinity levels. Hyola401, LRT1 and KRN1 with seed yield of 3.09, 2.78 and 2.30 g/plot, respectively were considered as salt tolerant genotypes. Stress (12dsm-1 ) to control ratio (S/C) which is indicating of salinity tolerance was high for seed yield of DSM12 and Hyola401.Significant positive correlation of seed yield with K and Cl, indicated that these shoot ions can be considered as good indicators for seed yield improving at saline environment.

Keywords: correlation; experiment; rapeseed; selection criteria; seed yield

  • Ashraf M., Mcneilly T. (2004): Salinity tolerance in Brassica oilseeds. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 23(2): 157-174.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bandeh-Hagh A., Toorchi M., Mohammadi A., Chaparzadeh N., Salekdeh G.H., Kazemnia H. (2008): Growth and osmotic adjustment of canola genotypes in response to salinity. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment 6(2): 201-208.Google Scholar

  • Bozcuk S. (1970): Water and salt relations of statics species with particular reference to the problem of halophytes. Ph.D. Thesis University of Sussex, UK.Google Scholar

  • Bybordi A. (2010): Effects of salinity on yield and component characters in canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Notulae Scientia Biologicae 2 (1), 81-83.Google Scholar

  • Francois L.E. (1996): Salinity effects on four sunflower hybrids. Agronomy Journal 88:215-219.Google Scholar

  • Gorham J. (1993): Genetics and physiology of enhanced K/ Na discrimination. In: Genetic aspects of plant mineral nutrition. Randall P. (Ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 151-159.Google Scholar

  • Gomez K.A., Gomez A.A. (1984): Statistical procedures for agricultural research; John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar

  • Isaac R.A., Kerber J.D. (1971): Atomic absorption and flame photometry: Techniques and uses in soil, plant and water analysis. In: Instrumental Methods for Analysis of Soil and Plant Tissue. Walsh, L. M. (Ed.). Soil Science of America, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 17-37.Google Scholar

  • Islam M.R., Bhuiyan M.A.R., Prasad B., Quddus M.A. (2001): Salinity effect on yield and component characters in rapeseed and mustard varieties. Journal of Biological Sciences 1(9): 840-842.Google Scholar

  • Kumar D. (1995): Salt tolerance in oilseed brassicas-present status and future prospects. Plant Breeding Abstract 65, (10): 1439-1477.Google Scholar

  • Lauchli A. (1990): Calcium, salinity and the plasma membrane. In: R.T. Leonard and P.K. Hepler (Ed.), Calcium in Plant Growth and Development. American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, Maryland, pp. 26-35.Google Scholar

  • Mahmoodzadeh H. (2008): Comparative study of tolerant and sensitive cultivars of Brassica napus in response to salt conditions. Asian Journal of plant Sciences 7(6), 594-598. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2008.594.598.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mandhania S., Madan S., Sheokand S. (2010): Differential response in salt tolerant and sensitive genotypes of wheat in terms of ascorbate, carotenoids proline and plant water relations. Asian Journal of Experimental Sciences 1(4):792-797.Google Scholar

  • Mer R.K., Prajith P.K., Pandya D.H., Pandey A.N. (2000): Effect of salts on germination of seeds and growth of young plants of Hordeum vulgare, Triticum aestivum, Cicerarietinum and Brassica juncea. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 185: 209-217.Google Scholar

  • Minhas P.S., Sharam D.R., Khosla B.K. (1990): Effect of alleviation of salinity stress at different growth stages of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 60(5): 343-346.Google Scholar

  • Munns R. (2002): Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, Cell and Environment 25: 239-250Google Scholar

  • Murillo-Amador B., Yamada S., Yamaguchi T., Rueda- Puente E., Avila-Serrano N., Garcia-Hernandez J.L., Lopez-Aguilar R., Troyo-Dieguez E., Nieto-Garibay A. (2007): Influence of calcium silicate on growth, physiological parameters and mineral nutrition in two legume species under salt stress. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 193: 413-421.Google Scholar

  • Porcelli C.A., Gutierrez-Boem F.H., Lavado R.S. (1995): The K/Na and Ca/Na ratios and rapeseed yield under soil salinity or sodicity. Plant Soil 175(2): 251-255.Google Scholar

  • Puppala N.J., Fowler L., Poindexter L., Bhadwaj H.L. (1999): Evaluation of salinity tolerance of canola germination, In Perspectives on new crops and new uses. Janick J.(Ed.); ASHS press, Alexandria, VA, pp. 251-253.Google Scholar

  • Rameeh V., Rezai A., Saeidi G. (2004): Study of salinity tolerance in rapeseed. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 35: 2849-2866.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • SAS INSTITUTE INC (2004): SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Version 9. Fourth Edition. Statistical Analysis Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar

  • Schroder J.I., Ward J.M., Gassmann W. (1994): Perspectives on the physiology and structure of inward-rectifying K channels in higher plants: biophysical implications for K uptake. Annual Review of Biophysics and Bimolecular Structure 23, 441-471.Google Scholar

  • Sharma P.C., Gill S.K. (1994): Salinity-induced effect on biomass, yield, yield-attributing characters and ionic contents in genotypes of Indian mustard (Brassicajuncea). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 64(11): 785-788.Google Scholar

  • Thakral N., Singh H., Kumar P., Yavada T.P., Mehta S.L. (1998): Association analysis between physio-chemical parameters with seed yield in Indian mustard under normal and saline environments. Crucifereae Newsletter 20: 59-60.Google Scholar

  • Tie H., Cramer G.R. (1992): Growth and mineral nutrition of 6 rapid-cycling Brassica species in response to seawater salinity. Plant and Soil 139 (2), 285-294.Google Scholar

  • Tunuturk M., Tuncturk R., Yildirim B., Ciftci V. (2011): Effect of salinity stress on plant fresh weight and nutrient composition of some Canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. African Journal of Biotechnology 10(10): 1827-1832.Google Scholar

  • Volkamar K.M., Hu Y., Steppuhn H. (1998): Physiological responses of plants to salinity: A review. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 78: 19-27.Google Scholar

  • Zamani Z., Nezami M.T., Habibi D., Khorshidi M.B. (2010): Effect of quantitative and qualitative performance of four canola cultivars (Brassica napus L.) to salinity conditions. Advances in Environmental Biology 4(3): 422-427.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-07-30

Published in Print: 2013-06-01


Citation Information: Agricultura tropica et subtropica, ISSN (Online) 1801-0571, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ats-2013-0010.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in