Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica

The Journal of Czech University of Life Sciences Prague

4 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1801-0571
See all formats and pricing




Social Preferences of Translocated Giraffes (Giraffa Camelopardalis Giraffa) in Senegal: Evidence for Friendship Among Females?

Lenka Malyjurkova
  • Department of Animal Sciences and Food Processing, Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech Universityof Life Sciences Prague
/ Marketa Hejzlarova
  • Department of Animal Sciences and Food Processing, Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech Universityof Life Sciences Prague
/ Pavla Junkova Vymyslicka
  • Department of Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
/ Karolina Brandlova
  • Department of Animal Sciences and Food Processing, Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech Universityof Life Sciences Prague
  • :
Published Online: 2014-05-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ats-2014-0001

Abstract

Giraffe social behaviour and relationships are currently in the period of scientific renaissance, changing the former ideas of nonexisting social bonds into understanding of complex social structures of giraffe herds. Different giraffe subspecies have been studied in the wild and only one was subject of detailed study in captivity. Our study focused on the neglected Cape giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis giraffa). We investigated the social preferences of 28 introduced giraffes in semi-captivity in Bandia reserve, Senegal. Our aim was to assess the group size of Cape giraffes outside their native range and describe their social relationships. Mean group size in Bandia was 7.22 ± 4.06 (range 2-17). The dyads were classified according to strength of relationship (weak, medium, strong) using the association index. We reported weak and medium relationships in all types of dyads except female-juvenile. The strongest bond was found in mother-calf dyads. Three of 21 possible female dyads also demonstrated strong relationships. Those three dyads included six of seven adult females, which we labelled as friends. Females associated more frequently with calves of their friends then with calves of non-friend females. The strength of the relationship between calves depended on the strength of relationship between their mothers. We concluded that Cape giraffes in new environment have shown similar group size and nonrandom preference for conspecifics as shown in wild and captive studies. The research was supported by CIGA 20135010, CIGA 2134217, IGA FTZ 20135123, ESF/MŠMT CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0040.

Keywords : Giraffa camelopardalis; translocation; female; calf; social bond; fission-fusion system; relationship; friendship; association index

References

  • Al Ogoumbrabe N. (2002): Les aires protégées au Sénégal: étude du cas de la Réserve de faune de Bandia: adaptation des animaux sauvages introduits et aspect socioéconomique, UCAD Dakar.

  • Antonínová M., Nežerková P., Vincke X., Al-Ogoumrabe N. (2004): Herd structure of the giant eland (Taurotragus derbianus derbianus) in the Bandia Reserve, Senegal.

  • Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica 37: 1-5.

  • Bashaw M. J. (2011): Consistency of captive giraffe behavior under two different management regimes. Zoo Biology 30: 371-378. [Crossref] [PubMed] [Web of Science]

  • Bashaw, M. J., Bloomsmith, M. A., Maple, T. L., and Bercovitch, F. B. (2007): The structure of social relationships among captive female giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis). Journal of Comparative Psychology 121(1):46-53. [Web of Science]

  • Bejder L., Fletcher D. (1998): A method for testing association patterns of social animals. Animal Behaviour 56: 719-725. [PubMed] [Crossref]

  • Bercovitch F. B., Bashaw M. J., del Castillo S. M. (2006): Sociosexual behavior, male mating tactics, and the reproductive cycle of giraffe Giraffa camelopardalis. Hormones and Behavior 50: 314-321. [Crossref] [PubMed]

  • Bercovitch F. B., Berry P. S. M. (2010): Ecological determinants of herd size in the Thornicroft’s giraffe of Zambia. African Journal of Ecology 48: 962-971. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Bercovitch F. B., Berry P. S. M. (2012): Herd composition, kinship and fission-fusion social dynamics among wild giraffe. African Journal of Ecology 51: 206-216. [Web of Science]

  • Bercovitch F. B., Berry P. S. M. (2013): Age proximity influences herd composition in wild giraffe. Journal of Zoology 290: 281-286. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Brown D.M., Brenneman R.A., Koepfli K.-P., Pollinger J.P., Mila B., Georgiadis N.J., Louis E.E., Grether G.F., Jacobs D.K., Wayne R.K. (2007): Extensive population genetic structure in the giraffe. BMC Biology 5: 57. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-5-57 [PubMed] [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Cairns S. J., Schwager S. J. (1987): A comparison of association indices. Animal Behaviour 35: 1454-1469. [Crossref]

  • Cameron E., Dutoit, J. (2005): Social influences on vigilance behaviour in giraffes. Animal Behaviour 69: 1337-1344. [Crossref]

  • Carter K. D., Brand R., Carter J. K., Shorrocks B., Goldizen A. W. (2013a): Social networks, long-term associations and age-related sociability of wild giraffes. Animal Behaviour 86: 901-910. [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • Carter K. D., Seddon J. M., Frere C. H., Carter J. K., Goldizen A. W. (2013b): Fission-fusion dynamics in wild giraffes may be driven by kinship, spatial overlap and individual social preferences. Animal Behaviour 85: 385-394. [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • Ciofolo I., Ambouta K., Le Pendu Y. (2009): The last West African giraffes: insured survival or threatened future ? Revue D Ecologie-La Terre Et La Vie 64: 351-358.

  • Ciofolo I., Le Pendu Y., Gosser A. (2000): The giraffes of Niger, the last West African giraffes. Revue D Ecologie- La Terre Et La Vie 55: 117-128.

  • Dupuy A. R. (1972): Essai de réintroduction de Girafes au Parc national du Niokolo Koba (Sénégal) Dakar. Notes Africaines, IFAN Dakar No 133: 21-26.

  • Estes R. D. (1991): The Behavior Guide to African Mammals. Including Hoofed Mammals, Carnivores, Primates. University of California Press, 640 p.

  • Fennessy J. (2009): Home range and seasonal movements of Giraffa camelopardalis angolensis in the northern Namib Desert. African Journal of Ecology 47: 318-327. [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • Fischer J., Lindenmayer D. B. (2000): An assessment of the published results of animal relocations. Biological Conservation 96: 1-11. [Crossref]

  • Ginsberg J. R., Young T. P. (1992): Measuring association between individuals or groups in behavioural studies. Animal Behaviour 44: 377-379. [Crossref]

  • GreeneT. V., Manne S. P., Reiter L. M. (2006): Developing models for mother-infant behaviour in Black rhinoceros and Reticulated giraffe Diceros bicornis michaeli and Giraffa camelopardalis reticulata at Brookfield Zoo, Illinois. International Zoo Yearbook 40: 372-378. [Crossref]

  • Groves C., Grubb P. (2011): Ungulate Taxonomy. Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Hassanin A., Ropiquet A., Gourmand A. L., Chardonnet B., Rigoulet J. (2007): Mitochondrial DNA variability in Giraffa camelopardalis: consequences for taxonomy, phylogeography and conservation of giraffes in West and central Africa. Comptes Rendus Biologies 330: 265-274. [Web of Science]

  • Hejcmanová P., Hejcman M., Camara A. A., Antonínová M. (2010): Exclusion of livestock grazing and wood collection in dryland savannah: an effect on long-term vegetation succession. African Journal of Ecology 48: 408-417. [Web of Science]

  • Langman V. A. (1977): Cow-calf Relationships in Giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis giraffa). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 43: 264-286.

  • Le Pendu Y., Ciofolo I. (1999): Seasonal movements of giraffes in Niger. Journal of Tropical Ecology 15: 341-353. [Crossref]

  • Le Pendu Y., Ciofolo I., Gosser A. (2000): The social organization of giraffes in Niger. African Journal of Ecology 38: 78-85. [Crossref]

  • Leuthold B. M. (1979): Social organization and behaviour of giraffe in Tsavo East National Park. African Journal of Ecology 17: 19-34. [Crossref]

  • Leuthold B. M., Leuthold W. (1978): Ecology of the giraffe in Tsavo East National Park, Kenya. African Journal of Ecology 16: 1-20. [Crossref]

  • Nezerkova-Hejcmanova P., Hejcman M., Camara A. A., Antoninova M., Pavlu V., Cerny T., Ba A. T. (2005): Analysis of the herbaceous undergrowth of the woody savanna in the Fathala Reserve, Delta du Saloum National Park (Senegal). Belgian Journal of Botany 138: 119-128.

  • Nežerková P., Verner P. H., Antonínová M. (2004): The conservation programme of the Western giant eland (Taurotragus derbianus derbianus Gray 1847) in Senegal - Czech Aid Development Project. Gazella 31: 87-182.

  • Pérez I., Anadón J. D., Díaz M., Nicola G. G., Tella J. L., Giménez A. (2012): What is wrong with current translocations? A review and a decision-making proposal. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10: 494-501. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Perry S. (2011): Social behaviour in captive reticulated giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis reticulata): Analysis of enclosure use and social interactions between giraffes housed at Whipsnade Zoo. The Plymouth Student Scientist, 4: 50-65.

  • Pratt D. M., Anderson V. H. (1982): Population, distribution, and behaviour of giraffe in the Arusha National Park, Tanzania. Journal of Natural History 16: 481-489. [Crossref]

  • Pratt D. M., Anderson V. H. (1985): Giraffe social behaviour. Journal of Natural History 19: 771-781. [Crossref]

  • Shorrocks B., Croft D. P. (2009): Necks and networks: a preliminary study of population structure in the reticulated giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis reticulata de Winston). African Journal of Ecology 47: 374-381. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Strauss M. K. L., Muller Z. (2013): Giraffe mothers in East Africa linger for days near the remains of their dead calves. African Journal of Ecology 51: 506-509. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Tarou L. R., Bashaw M. J., Maple T. L. (2000): Social attachment in giraffe: Response to social separation. Zoo Biology 19: 41-51. van der Jeugd H. P., Prins H. H. T. (2000): Movements and group structure of giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) in Lake Manyara National Park, Tanzania. Journal of Zoology 251: 15-21. [Crossref]

  • VanderWaal K. L., Wang H., McCowan B., Fushing H., Isbell L. A. (2014): Multilevel social organization and space use in reticulated giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis). Behavioral Ecology 25: 17-26. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Vincke X., Hornick J. L., Njikam N. I., Leroy P. (2005): Wildlife management in Senegal: Comparison between the Niokolo Koba National Park and the private Reserve of Bandia. Gestion de la faune sauvage au Sénégal: Comparaison du Parc national du Niokolo Koba et de la Réserve privée de Bandia 149: 232-237.

  • Wey T., Blumstein D. T., Shen W., Jordán F. (2008): Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality. Animal Behaviour 75: 333-344. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • White D. J., Smith V. A. (2007): Testing measures of animal social association by computer simulation. Behaviour 144: 1447-1468. [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • White F. (1983): Vegetation of Africa: a descriptive memoir to accompany the UNESCO/AETFAT/UNSO vegetation map of Africa. UNESCO, Paris, 356 p.

  • Whitehead H. (2009): SOCPROG programs: analysing animal social structures. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 63: 765-778. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Whitehead H., Bejder L., Andrea Ottensmeyer C. (2005): Testing association patterns: issues arising and extensions. Animal Behaviour 69: e1-e6.


Received: 2014-12-17

Accepted: 2014-03-31

Published Online: 2014-05-01

Published in Print: 2014-03-01


Citation Information: Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica. Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 5–13, ISSN (Online) 1801-0571, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ats-2014-0001, May 2014

© Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.