Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Acta Universitatis Cibiniensis. Series E: Food Technology

The Journal of „Lucian Blaga“ University of Sibiu

2 Issues per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Price – Strategic Instrument of EU Market Intervention. Case Study Seurop System

Mihaela Rotaru
  • Corresponding author
  • ”Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, Engineering Faculty, Industrial Engineering and Management Department, Romania
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-08-04 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/aucft-2015-0004


In 29 October 1975 Council Regulation of European Economic Community (EEC) provided the common organization of the pig meat market. In 1984, EEC considered it necessary to lay down general rules ensuring uniform grading of pig carcasses. The main objective of this paper is to describe how pig carcass classification implemented by EU legislation has become a core strategic competition between manufacturers. In the European Commission the carcass classification system is assimilated as an instrument of intervention. This guarantees the agricultural community a decent life. The classification and payment system promoted by EU producers ensure greater transparency of the market, providing to the economic agents involved in the sector quick access to information on evolution of prices in different markets.

Keywords: EU intervention mechanism; prices; grading; SEUROP; pig carcass classification.


  • 1. ADHB Industry Consulting, Review of the EU Carcase Classification System for beef and Sheep (EPES 0708/01), November 2008, retrieved 15.01.2015 from http://archive.defra.gov.uk/evidence/economics/foodfarm/reports/carcaseclassification/Full%20Version.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • 2. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 148/2014 of 17 February 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 1249/2008 as regards categories and classes for recording market prices in the beef sector and as regards market price for pig carcasses, http://eur-lex.europa.euGoogle Scholar

  • 3. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1249/2008 Community scales for the classification of beef, pig and sheep carcasses and the reporting of prices thereof, OJ L 46, 18.2.2014, pp. 1-2, http://eur-lex.europa.euGoogle Scholar

  • 4. Council of the European Communities (1984), Council Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84 of 13 November 1984 determining the Community scale for grading pig carcasses, Official Journal L 301, 20/11/1984 pp. 0001 -0003, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/Google Scholar

  • 5. Cross, H. R., Savell, J. W. (1994), “What do we need for a value based beef marketing system.” Meat Science, 36: 19-27PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 6. European Commission, Directorate general for Agriculture and Rural Development, Report EU market prices for representative products from 2007 http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/markets/prices/monthly_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • 7. European Commission, Directorate general for Agriculture and Rural Development, C3 Animal products, Weekly price report on Pig carcass (Class S, E, and R) and Piglet prices in EU https://circabc.europa.eu/faces/jsp/extension/wai/navigation/container.jspGoogle Scholar

  • 8. European Parliament and The Council of European Union, Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of 17 December 2013, establishing a common organization of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007, Annex IV, B, JO L 347, 20.12.2013, pp. 671-854Google Scholar

  • 9. Farmer, L. J., Devlin, D. J., Gault, F. S., Gee, A., Gordon, A. W., Moss, B. W., et al. (2009). “Effect of type and extent of cooking on the eating quality of Northern Ireland beef.” Proceedings of 55th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, 7 - 12 August 2009, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar

  • 10. Polkinghorne, R.J., & Thompson, J.M. (2010), Meat standards and grading. A world review, Meat Science, 86: 227-235.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 11. Rotaru M. (2014) The Use of Factor Analysis in Evaluating The Performances of a Business Model. Paper presented at 15th EBES Conference, January 8-10, 2015, Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar

  • 12. Rotaru, M., & Savescu R. (2014). The European Pig Carcasses Grading System - A Strategic Instrument of Competition, Joint International Conference of Doctoral and Post-Doctoral Researchers, 12-13 September, 2014, University from Craiova, Romania, Conference Proceedings, Volume 2, pp. 383-394.Google Scholar

  • 13. Savescu R. (2014). “Elements of Applied Statistics. Case Study: SEUROP Pig Classification System in Romania”, 15th EBES Conference, January 8-10, Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar

  • 14. Savescu R., & Plotz G. (2015). “Animal Carcass Pricing Grid. Evidences from the Romanian Pig Market” (paper in progress).Google Scholar

  • 15. Sorenson, S. E. (1989). Danish work on automated carcass measurements with emphasis on beef classification. The Automated Measurement of Beef. AMLC Technical Systems Publication Sydney, 1: 75−80, ISBN 0-642-14495-8.Google Scholar

  • 16. Watson, R., Polkinghorne, R., & Thompson, J. M. (2008). Development of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) prediction model for beef palatability. Australian J. of Experimental Agriculture, 48: 1368−1379.Google Scholar

  • 17. Walstra, P. & Merkus, G.S.M. (1996). Procedure for assessment of the lean meat percentage as a consequence of the new EU reference dissection method in pig carcass classification. Report ID-DLO 96.014, March, pp. 22 Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-08-04

Published in Print: 2015-07-01

Citation Information: Acta Universitatis Cibiniensis. Series E: Food Technology, Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 27–34, ISSN (Online) 2344-150X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/aucft-2015-0004.

Export Citation

© Lucian Blaga University. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in