Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Analyse & Kritik

Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory

Ed. by Baurmann, Michael / Leist, Anton / Tranow, Ulf

2 Issues per year

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 3, Issue 1


Inhaltsanalyse und strukturale Textanalyse

Werner Früh
Published Online: 2016-05-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-1981-0105


The criticism of the original behavioristic basis of content analysis does not take into account the present state of research. The method has long since overcome its limitation, only to be able to code physical communication in the form of printed or written material. Every intersubjective demonstrable meaning now can be the object of content analysis. In its claim to be able to adequately describe the content of texts it is only apparently in competition with linguistic „structural text analysis“. Due to the different research traditions from which they originated they were developed for different interests. While content analysis is the better method for hypothesis testing and selective description of large quantities of texts, structural text analysis is more efficient with respect to single and complex texts. One could image an optimal combination of both methods being possible.

About the article

Published Online: 2016-05-12

Published in Print: 1981-05-01

Citation Information: Analyse & Kritik, Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 93–116, ISSN (Online) 2365-9858, ISSN (Print) 0171-5860, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-1981-0105.

Export Citation

© 1981 by Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in