Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Analyse & Kritik

Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory

Ed. by Baurmann, Michael / Leist, Anton / Tranow, Ulf

2 Issues per year

Online
ISSN
2365-9858
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 11, Issue 1

Issues

Der Homo Oeconomicus: Ausnahmeerscheinung in jeder Situation oder Jedermann in Ausnahmesituationen?

Reinhard Zintl
Published Online: 2016-05-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-1989-0103

Abstract

Even if formally precise, the economic concept of rationality has different empirical implications depending on how it is used in theory building. If it is used as a tool of microfoundation in multi-level analysis it can be applied universally, but does not imply a specific model of human behavior. As a means of constructing microtheories proper it is, on the other hand, translated into a definite model of man but can be applied only to specific situations. This model, known as homo oeconomicus or economic man, should not be taken as an assertion about human nature but rather as a shorthand description of the behavior enforced and stabilized by social situations of a certain type.

About the article

Published Online: 2016-05-12

Published in Print: 1989-05-01


Citation Information: Analyse & Kritik, Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 52–69, ISSN (Online) 2365-9858, ISSN (Print) 0171-5860, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-1989-0103.

Export Citation

© 1989 by Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Gebhard Kirchgässner
Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 2013, Volume 149, Number 1, Page 1
[2]
Andreas Diekmann and Peter Preisendörfer
Rationality and Society, 1998, Volume 10, Number 1, Page 79
[3]
Andreas Diekmann and Peter Preisendörfer
Rationality and Society, 2003, Volume 15, Number 4, Page 441
[4]
Christian Seipel and Stefanie Eifler
Crime & Delinquency, 2010, Volume 56, Number 2, Page 167
[5]
Andreas Langer
Current Sociology, 2006, Volume 54, Number 4, Page 663
[6]
Gebhard Kirchgässner
European Journal of Political Economy, 1992, Volume 8, Number 2, Page 305
[7]
Margit Weihrich
Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 2002, Volume 12, Number 2, Page 189
[8]
[9]
Markus Quandt and Dieter Ohr
KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 2004, Volume 56, Number 4, Page 683
[10]
Kirsten Mensch
KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 2000, Volume 52, Number 2, Page 246
[11]
Mario Rese, Alexander Krebs, Michael Welling, and Annika Wilke
Journal of business market management, 2007, Volume 1, Number 1, Page 79
[12]
Jörg Rössel
KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 2006, Volume 58, Number 3, Page 453
[13]
Annette Schnabel
KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 2005, Volume 57, Number 2, Page 278
[15]
Michael Schmid
Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 1993, Volume 24, Number 2, Page 275

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in