Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Analyse & Kritik

Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory

Ed. by Baurmann, Michael / Leist, Anton / Tranow, Ulf

2 Issues per year

Online
ISSN
2365-9858
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 12, Issue 2

Issues

Utilitaristische Ethik und Tötungsverbot

Zu Peter Singers ‚Praktische Ethik‘

Dieter Birnbacher
Published Online: 2016-05-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-1990-0207

Abstract

One of the standard criticisms of classical utilitarian is that it is unable to provide an adequate ethical foundation for the wrongness of killing. It is reasoned that the five arguments against killing available to the classical utilitarian are indeed sufficient to provide such a foundation and that recourse to preference utilitarianism is neither called for nor helpful since it generates a number of problems of its own. On this basis, Singer’s discussion of selective abortion and the selective euthanasia of newborns is criticized from within utilitarianism for not giving sufficient weight to direct and indirect social side-effects, especially if ‘external’ criteria are introduced into the valuation of human life.

About the article

Published Online: 2016-05-12

Published in Print: 1990-11-01


Citation Information: Analyse & Kritik, Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 205–218, ISSN (Online) 2365-9858, ISSN (Print) 0171-5860, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-1990-0207.

Export Citation

© 1990 by Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in