Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Analyse & Kritik

Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory

Ed. by Baurmann, Michael / Leist, Anton / Tranow, Stefan

2 Issues per year

Online
ISSN
2365-9858
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 14, Issue 1

Issues

Two Models of Pluralism and Tolerance

Will Kymlicka
Published Online: 2016-05-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-1992-0103

Abstract

In his most recent work, John Rawls argues that political theory must recognize and accomodate the ‘fact of pluralism’, including the fact of religious diversity. He believes that the liberal commitment to individual rights provides the only feasible model for accomodating religious pluralism. In the paper, I discuss a second form of tolerance, based on group rights rather than individual rights. Drawing on historical examples, I argue that this is is also a feasible model for accomodating religious pluralism. While both models ensure tolerance between groups, only the former tolerates individual dissent within groups. To defend the individual rights model, therefore, liberals must appeal not only to the fact of social pluralism, but also to the value of individual autonomy. This may require abandoning Rawls’s belief that liberalism can and should be defended on purely ‘political’, rather than ‘comprehensive’ grounds.

About the article

Published Online: 2016-05-12

Published in Print: 1992-05-01


Citation Information: Analyse & Kritik, Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 33–56, ISSN (Online) 2365-9858, ISSN (Print) 0171-5860, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-1992-0103.

Export Citation

© 1992 by Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
François Boucher and Cécile Laborde
Criminal Law and Philosophy, 2016, Volume 10, Number 3, Page 493
[2]
PAOLO GIACCARIA
Geographical Review, 2012, Volume 102, Number 3, Page 293
[3]
Farrah Ahmed
International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 2016, Volume 30, Number 3, Page 248
[4]
John Coakley
Ethnopolitics, 2016, Volume 15, Number 1, Page 166

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in