Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Analyse & Kritik

Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory

Ed. by Baurmann, Michael / Leist, Anton / Tranow, Ulf

Online
ISSN
2365-9858
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 29, Issue 2

Issues

A Critical Discussion of the Characteristic Properties of List PR and FPTP Systems

Eliora van der Hout / Jack Stecher / Harrie de Swart
Published Online: 2016-05-14 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2007-0209

Abstract

This paper discusses the characteristic properties of List PR systems and FPTP systems, as given in Hout 2005 and Hout et al. 2006. While many of the properties we consider are common to both systems, it turns out (see Hout 2005) that the British system distinguishes itself by satisfying the district cancellation property, while the Dutch system distinguishes itself by satisfying consistency and anonymity. For scoring rules, topsonlyness is equivalent to being party fragmentation-proof (see Hout 2005; Hout et al. 2006). One might present this as an argument in favour of requiring topsonlyness. However, we will also give counter-arguments against insisting upon the property of being party fragmentation-proof.

About the article

Published Online: 2016-05-14

Published in Print: 2007-11-01


Citation Information: Analyse & Kritik, Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 259–268, ISSN (Online) 2365-9858, ISSN (Print) 0171-5860, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2007-0209.

Export Citation

© 2007 by Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in