Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Analyse & Kritik

Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory

Ed. by Baurmann, Michael / Leist, Anton / Tranow, Ulf

Online
ISSN
2365-9858
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 32, Issue 2

Issues

Scientific Knowledge and Scientific Expertise: Epistemic and Social Conditions of Their Trustworthiness

Martin Carrier
Published Online: 2016-05-14 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2010-0201

Abstract

The article explores epistemic and social conditions of the trustworthiness of scientific expertise. I claim that there are three kinds of conditions for the trustworthiness of scientific expertise. The first condition is epistemic and means that scientific knowledge enjoys high credibility. The second condition concerns the significance of scientific knowledge. It means that scientific generalizations are relevant for elucidating the particular cases that constitute the challenges for expert judgment. The third condition concerns the social processes involved in producing science-based recommendations. In this context trust is created by social robustness, expert legitimacy, and social participation.

About the article

Published Online: 2016-05-14

Published in Print: 2010-11-01


Citation Information: Analyse & Kritik, Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 195–212, ISSN (Online) 2365-9858, ISSN (Print) 0171-5860, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2010-0201.

Export Citation

© 2010 by Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[3]
Martin Carrier
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 2014, Volume 45, Page 97

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in