Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Analyse & Kritik

Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory

Ed. by Baurmann, Michael / Leist, Anton / Tranow, Ulf

Online
ISSN
2365-9858
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 33, Issue 1

Issues

Reciprocity in Economic Games

Julian Culp / Heiner Schumacher
Published Online: 2016-01-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2011-0123

Abstract

The evidence of laboratory experiments of behavioral economists shows that individuals behave reciprocally. These data put into question the pure self-interest thesis of human motivation of the homo oeconomicus model and call for alternative models. Focusing on the explanation of reciprocal behavior in Trust Games, this article proposes two directions that economists and other social scientists might want to consider in order to establish a more solid foundation for economic theory. First, it presents models that economic theorists developed to explain the laboratory evidence of reciprocal behavior. It highlights that all of these models subscribe to the Humean view that desires are at the source of any human motivation and suggests an alternative Kantian model where reasons have the capacity to motivate human action. Second, it emphasizes that a supplementary examination of the social background conditions would illuminate the analysis of the findings because of the connection between the 'local' and society-wide demands of reciprocity.

About the article

Published Online: 2016-01-12

Published in Print: 2011-05-01


Citation Information: Analyse & Kritik, Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages 349–364, ISSN (Online) 2365-9858, ISSN (Print) 0171-5860, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2011-0123.

Export Citation

© 2011 by Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Yurii Ivashuk
Ekonomìčna teorìâ, 2016, Volume 2016, Number 3, Page 69

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in