Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Agriculture and Environment

The Journal of "Sapientia" Hungarian University of Transylvania

1 Issue per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Landscape function analysis as a base of landscape visions

Krisztina Filepné Kovács / István Valánszki / Ágnes Sallay / Sándor Jombach / Zsuzsanna Mikházi / László Kollányi
Published Online: 2015-12-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ausae-2015-0005


An essential condition for the success of rural areas is the harmonious enforcement of ecologic, economic, and other educational, cultural, aesthetic goods/services of landscape, diversity of landscape functions. Landscape function analysis is a useful tool for the complex evaluation of rural regions. Using statistic and spatial data, we explored the landscape resources, potentials, and limitations of two pilot regions. But what about the future? Based on the landscape function analysis, we have defined special types of regions/landscape visions according to the long-term ability to retain population by the comparison of economic, production, and habitat value of the landscape.

Keywords: landscape scenario; population retention capacity; micro-regions of Gönc; Csorna


  • [1] Bastian, O., Krönert, R., and Lipský, Z. (2006), Landscape diagnosis on different space and time scales – A challenge for landscape planning. Landscape Ecology 21(3), 359–374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [2] de Groot, R., Hein, L. (2007), Concept and valuation of landscape functions at different scales. In: Mander, Ü., Wiggering, H., Helming, K. (eds), Multifunctional land use. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer, 15–36.Google Scholar

  • [3] Willemen, L., Hein, L., van Mensvoort, M. E. F.; Verburg, P. H. (2010), Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region. Ecological Indicators 10, 62–73.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [4] Costanza, R., Arge d’, R., Groot de, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., Belt van den, M. (1997), The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260.Google Scholar

  • [5] de Groot, R. S. (1992), Functions of nature: Evaluation of nature in environmental planning, management and decision making. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen.Google Scholar

  • [6] de Groot, R. (2006), Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 75, 175–186.Google Scholar

  • [7] MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005), Ecosystems and human well-being: Biodiversity synthesis. World Resource Institute, Washington D.C.Google Scholar

  • [8] Bastian, O. (1997), Gedanken zur Bewertung von Landschaftsfunktionen – unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Habitatfunktion, Schnevedingen, Germany: Alfred Toepfer Akademie für Naturschutz.Google Scholar

  • [9] OECD (2007), OECD Regions at a Glance: 2007 Edition. OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar

  • [10] Gómez-Sal A., Belmontes J.-A., Nicolau J.-M. (2003), Assessing landscape values: a proposal for a multidimensional conceptual model. Ecological modelling 168, 319–341.Google Scholar

  • [11] Koschke, L., Fürst, C., Frank, S., Makeschin, F. (2012), A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecological Indicators 21, 54–66.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [12] Kollányi L. (2004), Táji indikátorok alkalmazási lehetőségei a környezetállapot értékeléséhez. BKAE Tájtervezési és Területfejlesztési Tanszék, Budapest.Google Scholar

  • [13] Daniel, T. C. (2001), Whiter scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning 54, 267–282.Google Scholar

  • [14] Ehrlich, P. R., and Ehrlich, A. H. (1981), Interaction among landscape elements: A core of landscape ecology. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

  • [15] Swanwick, C. (2002), Landscape character assessment. Guidance for England and Scotland. Scottish Natural Heritage and Countryside Agency, Cheltenham and Edinburgh.Google Scholar

  • [16] de Groot, R. S., Wilson, M., Boumans, R. (2002), A typology for the description, classification and valuation of ecosystem functions. Goods Services Econ. 41(3), 393–408.Google Scholar

  • [17] Gobster, P. H. (1999), An ecological aesthetic for forest landscape management. Landscape Journal 18(1), 54–64.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2015-04-22

Revised: 2015-05-24

Accepted: 2015-06-25

Published Online: 2015-12-22

Published in Print: 2015-12-01

Citation Information: Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Agriculture and Environment, Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 58–70, ISSN (Online) 2068-2964, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ausae-2015-0005.

Export Citation

© 2015 Krisztina Filepné Kovács et al., published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in