Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, European and Regional Studies

2 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2068-7583
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Beyond Assimilation and Integration: The Shift to ‘National’ and ‘Transnational’ Inclusion

Christopher Houtkamp
Published Online: 2016-03-18 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auseur-2015-0014

Abstract

One of the key concepts of the MIME (Mobility and Inclusion in Multilingual Europe) project is, obviously, ‘inclusion’. However, precisely describing what the concept means is not as straightforward as it may seem. It has been used in different contexts in scientific literature. This paper attempts to contribute to the enfolding MIME-framework by critically reflecting upon the definition of ‘inclusion’. Drawing upon theories of acculturation, three core concepts in minority literature, namely ‘assimilation,’ ‘integration,’ and ‘inclusion’ will be examined, and their differences demarcated. In the light of recent developments, such as transnationalism, it will be determined which concept is best suited to analyse contemporary accommodation processes of minorities in their countries of residence. After examining the trade-off between mobility and inclusion, a central topic in all MIMErelated research, some general conclusions about ‘inclusion’ and diversitymanagement will be drawn.

Keywords: inclusion; integration; assimilation; diversity policy; mobilityinclusion trade-off

References

  • AREND-STÓTH, J.-VAN DE VIJVER, F. 2003. Multiculturalism and Acculturation: Views of Dutch and Turkish-Dutch. European Journal of Social Psychology 33(2): 249-266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • BASCH, L.-GLICK SCHILLER, N.-SZANTON BLANC, C. 2008. Transnational Projects: A New Perspective and Theoretical Premises. In: Khagram, S.-Levitt, P. (eds), The Transnational Studies Reader: Intersections & Innovations. New York: Routledge, pp. 261-272.Google Scholar

  • Berry, J. 1980. Acculturation as Varieties of Adaptation. In: Padilla, A. (ed.), Acculturation: Theory Models and Findings. Boulder: Westview, 9-25.Google Scholar

  • 1990. Psychology of Acculturation. In: Berman, J. (ed.), Cross-Cultural Perspectives: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1989: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Current Theory and Research in Motivation. University of Nebraska Press: Nebraska, 201-234.Google Scholar

  • 1997. Immigration, Acculturation and Adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review 46: 5-34.Google Scholar

  • 2005. Acculturation: Living in Two Successful Cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 29(6): 697-712.Google Scholar

  • 2006. Stress Perspectives on Acculturation. In: Sam, D.-Berry, J. The Cambridge Handbook of Acculturation Psychology. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 43-57.Google Scholar

  • BOURHIS, R.-MOÏSE, L.-PERRAULT, S.-SENÉCAL, S. 1997. Towards an Interactive Acculturation Model: A Social Psychological Approach. International Journal of Psychology 32: 369-386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • BURK, J. 1995. Citizenship Status and Military Service: The Quest for Inclusion by Minorities and Conscientious Objectors. Armed Forces & Society 21(4): 503-529.Google Scholar

  • CASTELLS, M. 2010. The Rise of the Network Society. Wiley-Blackwell: West- Sussex.Google Scholar

  • GOFORTH, A.-OKA, E.-LEONG, F.-DENIS, D. 2014. Acculturation, Acculturative Stress, Religiosity and Psychological Adjustment among Muslim Arab American Adolescents. Journal of Muslim Mental Health 8(2): 3-19.Google Scholar

  • GORDON, M. 1964. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. Oxford University Press: New York.Google Scholar

  • GRIN, F.-MARÁCZ, L.-POKORN, N.-KRAUS, P. 2014 ‘Mobility and Inclusion in Multilingual Europe: A Position Paper. Accessed via: http://mime-project.org/resources/MIME-POSITION-PAPER-V4.pdf.Google Scholar

  • HABERMAS, J. 1994. Struggles for Recognition in the Democratic Constitutional State. Gutmann, A. (ed.), Multiculturalism. Princeton University Press: New Jersey, 107-148.Google Scholar

  • 2008. Notes on Post-Secular Society. New Perspectives Quarterly 25(4): 17-29.Google Scholar

  • HEHMAN, E.-GAERTNER, S.-DOVIDIO, J.-MANIA, E.-GUERRA, R.-WILSON, D.-FRIEL, B. 2012. Group Status Drives Majority and Minority Integration Preferences. Psychological Science 23(1): 46-52.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • HORENCZYK, G. 1996. Migrating Selves in Conflict. In: Breakwell, G.-Lyons, E. (eds), Changing European Identities. Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, 241-250.Google Scholar

  • HOUTKAMP, C. 2014. Integrating Language in Theories on Long-Distance Movement: Migration vs Mobility & the Concept of Motility. A’dam Multiling 2014 1(1): 16-26.Google Scholar

  • HUGO, G. 2005. Migrants in Society: Diversity and Cohesion. Global Commission on International Migration.Google Scholar

  • KOOPMANS, R. 2010. Trade-Offs between Equality and Difference: Immigrant Integration, Multiculturalism and the Welfare State in Cross-National Perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36(1): 1-26.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • KOSIC, A.-MANNETTI, L.-SAM, D. 2005. The Role of Majority Attitudes towards Out-Group in the Perception of the Acculturation Strategies of Immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 29(3): 273-288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • KYMLICKA, W. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • LÓPEZ-RODRÍGUEZ, L.-ZAGEFKA, H.-NAVAS, M.-CUADRADO, I. 2014. Explaining Majority Members’ Acculturation Preferences for Minority Members: A Mediation Model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 38: 36-46.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • MARKUS, H.-STEELE, C.-STEELE, D. 2000. Colorblindness as a Barrier to Inclusion: Assimilation and Nonimmigrant Minorities. Daedalus, 233-259.Google Scholar

  • PEDRINI, S.-BÄCHTIGER, A.-STEENBERGEN, M. 2013. Deliberative Inclusion of Minorities: Patterns of Reciprocity among Linguistic Groups in Switzerland. European Political Science Review 5(03): 483-512.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • PORTES, A.-GUARNIZO, L.-LANDHOLDT, P. 1999. Introduction - Pitfalls and Promise of an Emergent Research Field. Ethnic and Racial Studies 22(2): 217-238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • POTASH, D. 1973. Mandatory Inclusion of Racial Minorities on Jury Panels. Black L.J. 3: 80.Google Scholar

  • URRY, J. 2002. Mobility and Proximity. Sociology 36(2): 255-272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • PUTNAM, R. 2007. E pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty- First Century. Scandinavian Political Studies 30(2): 137-174. ROJAS, A.-NAVAS, M.-SAYANS-JIMÉNEZ, P.-CUADRADO, I. 2014.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Acculturation Preference Profiles of Spaniards and Romanian Immigrants: The Role of Prejudice and Public and Private Acculturation Areas. The Journal of Social Psychology 154(4): 339-351.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • RUEDIN, D.-D’AMATO, G. 2011. Social Cohesion Challenges in Europe. EU-US Immigration Systems 2011/04, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, San Domenico di Fiesole (FI): European University Institute.Google Scholar

  • RYAN, L.-SALES, R.-TILKI, M.-SIARA, B. 2008. Social Networks, Social Support and Social Capital: The Experiences of Recent Polish Migrants in London. Sociology 42(4): 672-690.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SIRIN, S.-RYCE, P.-GUPTA, T.-ROGERS-SIRIN, L. 2013. The Role of Acculturative Stress on Mental Health Symptoms for Immigrant Adolescents: A Longitudinal Investigation. Developmental Psychology 49(4): 736-748.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • TAYLOR, C. 1994. The Politics of Recognition. In: Gutmann, A. (ed.), Multiculturalism, Princeton University Press: New Jersey, 25-73.Google Scholar

  • TÖNNIES, F. 1974. Community and Association. Taylor & Francis: London.Google Scholar

  • VAN HOUDT, F.-SUVARIEROL, S.-SCHINKEL, W. 2011. Neoliberal Communitarian Citizenship: Current Trends towards ‘Earned Citizenship’ in the United Kingdom, France and the Netherlands. International Sociology 26(3): 408-432.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • VAN OUDENHOVEN, J.-PRINS, K.-Buunk, B. 1998. Attitudes of Minority and Majority Members towards Adaptation of Immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology 28: 995-1013.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • VERTOVEC, S. 1999. Conceiving and Researching Transnationalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies 22(2): 445-462.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • WIESBROCK, A. 2011. The Integration of Immigrants in Sweden, a Model for the European Union? International Migration 49(4): 48-66.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • WRIGHT, M.-BLOEMRAAD, I. 2012. Is There a Trade-Off between Multiculturalism and Socio-Political Integration? Policy Regimes and Immigrant Incorporation in Comparative Perspective. Perspectives on Politics 10(01): 77-95.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • YOON, E.-CHANG, C.-KIM, S.-CLAWSON, A.-CLEARY, S.-HANSEN, M.- GOMES, A. M. 2013. A Meta-Analysis of Acculturation/Enculturation and Mental Health. Journal of Counseling Psychology 60(1): 15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • ZAGEFKA, H.-BINDER, J.-BROWN, R.-KESSLER, T.-MUMMENDEY, A.- FUNKE, F.-MAQUIL, A. 2014. The Relationship between Acculturation Preferences and Prejudice: Longitudinal Evidence from Majority and Minority Groups in Three European Countries. European Journal of Social Psychology 44(6): 578-589. CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2016-03-18

Published in Print: 2015-12-01


Citation Information: Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, European and Regional Studies, Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 73–87, ISSN (Online) 2068-7583, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auseur-2015-0014.

Export Citation

© 2016. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in