Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, European and Regional Studies

2 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2068-7583
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Why Multilingualism and Multilingual Communication Jeopardize a Common Social Policy for Europe

László Marácz
Published Online: 2017-09-16 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auseur-2017-0001

Abstract

This paper studies the consequences of European multilingualism and multilingual communication for a common social policy in the Europe Union. In the past fifty years, the main focus of the Europeanization project has been on financial-economic developments and less on a common social policy. Even today, there is no common framework for social protection in the European Union. Common minimum income or wages for European citizens are lacking. In this paper, it will be argued that the lack of social protection has to do with Europe’s linguistic diversity. Language is seen as a building block of national communities and their political cultures. The European integration project can only continue if different European political cultures are shared. However, due to the fact that a neutral lingua franca is lacking, this has been unsuccessful so far. The interaction of social groups that have a different language repertoire with the structures of multilevel governance are responsible for the fact that some of these social groups, including the ‘Eurostars’, and national cosmopolitans benefit from social protection, whereas other groups lacking relevant language skills, such as anti-establishment forces, commoners, and migrants, are excluded from the European power domains. These power configurations can be fruitfully studied in the floral figuration model. Consequently, due to these patterns of inclusion and exclusion, true solidarity among European citizens is not within reach. These claims will be illustrated by a case study on the Netherlands, a country that has been pursuing neoliberal policies counterbalancing Eurozone and economic crises and is trying to assimilate migrants and other newcomers. Apart from assimilatory policies targeting migrants, language games used by competing forces are playing an important role in the discourse in order to set up power structures.

Keywords: multilingualism; multilevel governance; Social Europe; floral figuration model; migrants; language games

References

  • ANDERSON, Karen M. 2015. Social Policy in the European Union. Palgrave, London.Google Scholar

  • BARBIER, Jean-Claude. 2013. The Road to Social Europe: A Contemporary Approach to Political Cultures and Diversity in Europe. Routledge, London–New York.Google Scholar

  • BARBIER, Jean-Claude. 2014. The Myth of English Language Competence in Europe and Some of Its Consequences. Paper presented at the Symposium Economics, Linguistic, Justice and Language Policy. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 2–3 March 2015.Google Scholar

  • BOURDIEU, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • BOVENS, Mark et al. (eds). 2014. Gescheiden werelden? Een verkenning van sociaal-culturele tegenstellingen in Nederland. Den Haag, Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau en Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid.Google Scholar

  • CASTELLS, Manuel. 2013. Communication Power. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

  • CASTELLS, Manuel. 2014. The Power of Identity. Second Edition with a New Preface. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar

  • CRUL, Maurice–DOOMERNIK, Jeroen. 2003. The Turkish and Moroccan Second Generation in the Netherlands: Divergent Trends between and Polarization within the Two Groups. In: International Migration Review 37(4): 1039–1064.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DE BRUIJN, Hans. 2010. Geert Wilders in debat. Over de framing en reframing van een politieke boodschap. Boom Lemma Uitgevers, Den Haag.Google Scholar

  • DE SWAAN, Abram. 1988. Care of the State: Health Care, Education and Welfare in Europe and the USA in the Modern Era. Oxford University Press, New York. 2001. Words of the World: The Global System. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • EDWARDS, John. 2012. Multilingualism. Understanding Linguistic Diversity. Continuum, London.Google Scholar

  • ESPING-ANDERSEN, Gosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • FAVELL, Adrian. 2008. Eurostars and Eurocities: Free Movement and Mobility in an Integrating Europe. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.Google Scholar

  • FERRERA, Maurizio. 2005. The Boundaries of Welfare, European Integration and the New Spatial Politics of Social Protection. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

  • FLIGSTEIN, Neil. 2008. Euro-Clash, the EU, European Identity and the Future of Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

  • GAZZOLA, Michele. 2014. Multilingualism for Effective Communication. An Evaluation of the European Commission’s de facto Language Policy. Paper presented at the conference Multidisciplinary Approaches in Language Policy and Planning, 4–6 September 2014, University of Calgary.Google Scholar

  • GHORASHI, Halleh–VAN TILBURG, Maria. 2006. When Is My Dutch Good Enough? Experiences of Refugee Women with Dutch Labour Organizations. In: JIMI/RIMI 7(1) Winter/hiver, 51–70.Google Scholar

  • GRIN, François. 2014. Fashionable Sociolinguistic Constructs: Some Implications for Politics and Policy. Paper presented at the RECODE Workshop The Politics of Multilingualism: Linguistic Governance, Globalisation and Europeanization, 19–20 June 2014, University of Geneva.Google Scholar

  • HASELHUBER, Jacob. 2012. Mehrsprachigkeit in der Europäischen Union: eine Analyse der EU-Sprachenpolitik, mit besonderem Fokus auf Deutschland. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • HOOGHE, Liesbet–MARKS, Gary. 2001. Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Rowman and Littlefield, Oxford.Google Scholar

  • HÜLMBAUER, Cornelia–BÖHRINGER, Heike–SEIDLHOFER, Barbara. 2008. Introducing English as a Lingua Franca (ELF): Precursor and Partner in Intercultural Communication. In: Synergies Europe 3: 25–36.Google Scholar

  • JEENE, Marjolein–Van OORSCHOT, Wim–UUNK, Wilfre. 2014. The Dynamics of Welfare Opinions in Changing, Economic, Institutional and Political Contexts: an Empirical Analysis of Dutch Deservingness Opinions, 1975–2006. In: Social Indicators Research.Google Scholar

  • KUITENBROUWER, Ja. 2010. De woorden van Wilders en hoe ze werken. De Bezige Bij, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

  • KOOPMANS, Ruu. 2015. Does Assimilation Work? Socio-Cultural Determinants of Labor Market Participation of European Muslims. Unpublished Manuscript, Humboldt University Berlin.Google Scholar

  • KUUS, Merje. 2014. Geopolitics and Expertise. Knowledge and Authority in European Diplomacy. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar

  • LABRIE, Norman. 1994. La construction linguistique de la Communauté Européenne. Champion, Paris.Google Scholar

  • MAIER, Michae. 2014. Die Plünderung der Welt, Wie die Finanz-Eliten unsere Enteignung planen. Finanzbuch Verlag, Munich.Google Scholar

  • MARÁCZ, László–ROSELLO, Mireille (eds). 2012. Multilingual Europe, Multilingual Europeans. Rodopi, Amsterdam–New York.Google Scholar

  • McCORMICK, John. 2015. European Union Politics. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke.Google Scholar

  • PHILLIPSON, Robert. 2006. English-Only Europe? Challenging Language Policy. Routledge, London.Google Scholar

  • PHILLIPSON, Robert.2009. Linguistic Imperialism Continued. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar

  • POOL, Jonathan–GROFMAN, Bernard. 1984. Language as Political Control: Newspeak Revisited. Paper Prepared for the 1984 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Washington, D.C., 30 August–2 September 1984.Google Scholar

  • RICENTO, Thomas (ed.). 2015. Language Policy and Political Economy: English in a Global Context. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

  • ROTHSTEIN, Bo. 1998. Just Institutions Matter: the Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • SCHARPF, Fritz W. 2010. The Asymmetry of European Integration, or Why the EU Cannot Be a Social Market Economy. Socio-Economic Review 8(2): 211–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • VAN MEURS, Wim–DE BRUIN, Robin–HOETINK, Carla–VAN LEEUWEN, Karin–REIJNEN, Carlos–VAN DE GRIFT, Liesbeth. 2013. Europa in alle staten. Zestig jaar geschiedenis van de Europese integratie. Uitgeverij Vantilt, Nijmegen.Google Scholar

  • VAN MIDDELAAR, Luuk. 2013. The Passage to Europe: How a Continent Became a Union. Yale University Press, New Haven–London.Google Scholar

  • VAN PARIJS, Philippe. 2011. Linguistic Justice for Europe and for the World. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

  • WALLACE, Helen–POLLACK, Mark A.–YOUNG, Alasdair R. 2015. Policy-Making in the European Union. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

  • WANG, Cong–STEINER, Bodo. 2015. Can Ethno-Linguistic Diversity Explain Cross-Country Differences in Social Capital? A Global Perspective. Economic Record 91(294): 338–366.Google Scholar

  • Files

About the article

Published Online: 2017-09-16

Published in Print: 2017-09-01


Citation Information: Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, European and Regional Studies, ISSN (Online) 2068-7583, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auseur-2017-0001.

Export Citation

© 2017 László Marácz, published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in