Christopher Haubeck, Winfried Lamersdorf and Alexander Fay, A Knowledge Carrying Service-Component Architecture for Smart Cyber Physical Systems: An Example based on self-documenting production systems, in: Int. Works. on Engineering Service-Oriented Applications and Cloud Services, 2018.Google Scholar
Birgit Vogel-Heuser, Stefan Feldmann, Jens Folmer, Jan Ladiges, Alexander Fay, Sascha Lity, Matthias Tichy, Matthias Kowal, Ina Schaefer, Christopher Haubeck and et al., Selected challenges of software evolution for automated production systems, in: Int. Conf. on Industrial Informatics, pp. 314–321, IEEE, 2015.Google Scholar
Michael W. Godfrey and Daniel M. German, The past, present, and future of software evolution, in: Frontiers of Software Maintenance, pp. 129–138, IEEE, 2008.Google Scholar
Ina Schaefer, Lorenzo Bettini, Viviana Bono, Ferruccio Damiani and Nico Tanzarella, Delta-oriented programming of software product lines, in: Int. Conf. on Software Product Lines, pp. 77–91, Springer, 2010.Google Scholar
Jan Ladiges, Christopher Haubeck, Alexander Fay and Winfried Lamersdorf, Evolution management of production facilities by semi-automated requirement verification, at-Automatisierungstechnik 62(11) (2014), 781–793.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Ursula Goltz, Ralf H. Reussner, Michael Goedicke, Wilhelm Hasselbring, Lukas Märtin and Birgit Vogel-Heuser, Design for future: managed software evolution, Computer Science-Research and Development 30(3–4) (2015), 321–331.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Jan Ladiges, Alexander Fülber, Esteban Arroyo, Alexander Fay, Christopher Haubeck and Winfried Lamersdorf, Learning material flow models for manufacturing plants from data traces, in: Int. Conf. on Industrial Informatics, pp. 294–301, IEEE, 2015.Google Scholar
Jan Ladiges, Alexander Fay and Winfried Lamersdorf, Automated Determining of Manufacturing Properties and Their Evolutionary Changes from Event Traces, Intelligent Industrial Systems 2(2) (2016), 163–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Timo Kehrer, Udo Kelter and Gabriele Taentzer, A rule-based approach to the semantic lifting of model differences in the context of model versioning, in: Int. Conf. on Automated Software Engineering, pp. 163–172, IEEE, 2011.Google Scholar
Timo Kehrer, Calculation and Propagation of Model Changes Based on User-level Edit Operations: A Foundation for Version and Variant Management in Model-driven Engineering, in: Ph. D. Thesis, University of Siegen, Germany, 2015.Google Scholar
Timo Kehrer, Udo Kelter and Gabriele Taentzer, Consistency-preserving edit scripts in model versioning, in: Int. Conf. on Automated Software Engineering, pp. 191–201, IEEE, 2013.Google Scholar
Udo Kelter, Timo Kehrer and Dennis Koch, Patchen von Modellen, in: Software Engineering, pp. 171–184, Citeseer, 2013.Google Scholar
Abhishek Chakraborty, Christopher Haubeck, Alexander Fay and Winfried Lamersdorf, Signal-based Context Comparative Analysis for Identification of Similar Manufacturing Modules, in: 16th Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing, 2018.Google Scholar
Jay Lee, Behrad Bagheri and Hung-An Kao, Recent advances and trends of cyber-physical systems and big data analytics in industrial informatics, in: Int. Conf. on Industrial Informatics, pp. 1–6, 2014.Google Scholar
Jim Buckley, Tom Mens, Matthias Zenger, Awais Rashid and Günter Kniesel, Towards a taxonomy of software change, J. of Software: Evolution and Process 17(5) (2005), 309–332.Google Scholar
B. Otto, S. Lohmann, S. Auer, G. Brost, J. Cirullies, A. Eitel, T. Ernst, C. Haas, M. Huber, C. Jung and et al., Reference architecture model for the Industrial Data Space, Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (2017).Google Scholar
Michael Mainelli and Mike Smith, Sharing ledgers for sharing economies: an exploration of mutual distributed ledgers (aka blockchain technology), (2015).
Stefan Feldmann, Julia Fuchs and Birgit Vogel-Heuser, Modularity, variant and version management in plant automation–future challenges and state of the art, in: Int. Design Conf., 2012.Google Scholar
Birgit Vogel-Heuser, Christoph Legat, Jens Folmer and Stefan Feldmann, Researching evolution in industrial plant automation: Scenarios and documentation of the pick and place unit, Institute of Automation and Information Systems, TU München, Report, 2014.Google Scholar
Christopher Haubeck, Alexander Pokahr, Winfried Lamersdorf, Abhishek Chakraborty, Jan Ladiges and Alexander Fay, Evolution of cyber-physical production systems supported by community-enabled experiences, in: Int. Conf. on Industrial Informatics, pp. 867–874, IEEE, 2017.Google Scholar
Ethan Buchman, Tendermint: Byzantine fault tolerance in the age of blockchains, in: Ph. D. Thesis, The University of Guelph, 2016.Google Scholar
Igor Buzhinsky and Valeriy Vyatkin, Automatic inference of finite-state plant models from traces and temporal properties, Transactions on Industrial Informatics 13(4) (2017), 1521–1530.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dimitri Lefebvre and Edouard Leclercq, Stochastic Petri net identification for the fault detection and isolation of discrete event systems, Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans 41(2) (2011), 213–225.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Martin Strube, Stefan Runde, Helmut Figalist and Alexander Fay, Risk minimization in modernization projects of plant automation—a knowledge-based approach by means of semantic web technologies, in: Conf. on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation, pp. 1–8, IEEE, 2011.Google Scholar
Daniel Regulin, Thomas Aicher and Birgit Vogel-Heuser, Improving transferability between different engineering stages in the development of automated material flow modules, Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 13(4) (2016), 1422–1432.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefan Feldmann, Konstantin Kernschmidt and Birgit Vogel-Heuser, Combining a SysML-based modeling approach and semantic technologies for analyzing change influences in manufacturing plant models, Procedia CIRP 17 (2014), 451–456.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luca Berardinelli, Rainer Drath, Emanuel Maetzler and Manuel Wimmer, On the evolution of CAEX: A language engineering perspective, in: Int. Conf. on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, pp. 1–8, IEEE, 2016.Google Scholar
Omid Fatahi Valilai and Mahmoud Houshmand, A collaborative and integrated platform to support distributed manufacturing system using a service-oriented approach based on cloud computing paradigm, Robotics and computer-integrated manufacturing 29(1) (2013), 110–127.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Valentina Boschian, Mariagrazia Dotoli, Maria Pia Fanti, Giorgio Iacobellis and Walter Ukovich, A metamodeling approach to the management of intermodal transportation networks, Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 8(3) (2011), 457–469.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Luca Berardinelli, Stefan Biffl, Emanuel Maetzler, Tanja Mayerhofer and Manuel Wimmer, Model-based co-evolution of production systems and their libraries with AutomationML, in: Conf. on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation.Google Scholar
Miriam Schleipen, Arndt Lüder, Olaf Sauer, Holger Flatt and Jürgen Jasperneite, Requirements and concept for plug-and-work, at-Automatisierungstechnik 63(10) (2015), 801–820.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Michael Würsch, Emanuel Giger and Harald C Gall, Evaluating a query framework for software evolution data, Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 22(4) (2013), 38.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Christophe Seidl, Ina Schaefer and Uwe Assmann, DeltaEcore – A Model-Based Delta Language Generation Framework, in: Modellierung, 2014.Google Scholar
Petra Brosch, Philip Langer, Martina Seidl, Konrad Wieland, Manuel Wimmer, Gerti Kappel, Werner Retschitzegger and Wieland Schwinger, An example is worth a thousand words: Composite operation modeling by-example, in: Int. Conf. on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, pp. 271–285, Springer, 2009.Google Scholar
Antonio Cicchetti, Davide Di Ruscio and Alfonso Pierantonio, Model patches in model-driven engineering, in: Int. Conf. on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, pp. 190–204, Springer, 2009.Google Scholar
Timo Kehrer, Udo Kelter and Gabriele Taentzer, Propagation of software model changes in the context of industrial plant automation, at-Automatisierungstechnik 62(11) (2014), 803–814.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
About the article
Christopher Haubeck (born 1985) is a researcher in the Distributed Systems research unit in the department for informatics of the Hamburg University. His main scientific interests are software for distributed and cyber-physical systems, architectures for knowledge carrying software, coevolution of runtime artefacts and simulation.
Heiko Bornholdt was born in 1989 in Pinneberg, Germany. From 2009 to 2017, he studied Computer Science with a focus on Distributed Systems at the University of Hamburg. Since 2018, he has been working at the University of Hamburg as a research assistant at the Distributed Systems research unit.
Winfried Lamersdorf is a professor in the Informatics Department of Hamburg University and head of the Distributed Systems research unit. His main scientific interests are in the areas of system software for distributed systems, service-orientation, middleware, agent- and component-oriented, autonomous, self-organizing and mobile systems as well as related applications from e-business / e-services via business process management up to logistics and production automation.
Abhishek Chakraborty (born 1988) is currently working as a Research Associate with the Institute of Automation Technology at Helmut Schmidt University Hamburg. His main research interests are management of evolution in automated systems, behavior models and cyber-physical systems.
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Alexander Fay (born 1970) is Director of the Institute of Automation Technology at Helmut Schmidt University Hamburg. His main research interests are models, methods, and tools for the efficient engineering of distributed automation systems. Prof. Fay also heads the division “Engineering and operation” in the German association for Measurement and Automation (VDI-/VDE-GMA) and is member of the Scientific Advisory Board of the German Platform “Industrie 4.0”.
Published Online: 2018-10-17
Published in Print: 2018-10-25
Funding Source: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Award identifier / Grant number: SPP1593
This work was partially supported by the DFG (German Research Foundation) under the Priority Programme SPP1593: Design for Future – Managed Software Evolution.