Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Business and Politics

Editor-in-Chief: Aggarwal, Vinod K.


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.384
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.352
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.459

More options …
Volume 16, Issue 1 (Apr 2014)

Issues

Beyond the transatlantic divide: the multiple authorities of standards in the global political economy of services

Jean-Christophe Graz
  • Corresponding author
  • Institut d’Etudes Politiques et Internationales, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Christophe Hauert
  • Institut d’Etudes Politiques et Internationales, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, and Department of International Politics, City University London, London, UK
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2013-12-05 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2012-0009

Abstract

This paper explores the plurality of institutional environments in which standards for the service sector are expected to support the rise of a global knowledge-based economy. A wide range of international bodies is able to define standards affecting the internationalization of services. Relying on global political economy approaches, the analysis uncovers the power relations underpinning the various forms of standards supporting a deeper integration of the market for services. Service standards are conceived as heterogeneous forms of transnational hybrid authority. The empirical study focuses on recent developments in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), the European Union, and the US. In contrast to conventional views opposing the American system to the ISO/European framework, the paper argues that institutional developments of service standards are likely to face trade-offs and compromises reflecting contrasting models of standardization, not only between, but also across, those systems. While this undermines the conventional analysis of a transatlantic divide in standardization, it also shows that the variance between product and service standards is much greater in the European context and the ISO system than in the US, where it is hardly debated.

References

  • Abbott, Kenneth W. and Duncan Snidal. 2001. “International ‘Standards’ and International Governance.” Journal of European Public Policy 8 (3): 345–370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blind, Knut. 2003. “Standards in the Service Sector: An Explorative Study.” European Commission, Enterprise Directorate-General.Google Scholar

  • Blind, Knut. 2004. The Economics of Standards: Theory, Evidence, Policy. Cheltenham: E. Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Blind, Knut and André Jungmittag. 2005. “Trade and the Impact of Innovations and Standards: The Case of Germany and the UK.” Applied Economics 37: 1385–1398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boden, Mark and Ian Miles. 2000. “Conclusions: Beyond the services Economy.” In Services and the Knowledge-Based Economy, edited by Mark Boden and Ian Miles. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Brunsson, Nils, Bengt Jacobsson, and Associates. 2000. A World of Standards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Brunsson, Nils, Andreas Rasche, and David Seidl. 2012. “The Dynamics of Standardization: Three Perspectives on Standards in Organization Studies.” Organization Studies 33 (5–6): 613–632.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bryson, John R. and Peter W. Daniels, eds. 2007. The Handbook of Service Industries. Cheltenham: E. Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Busch, Lawrence. 2011. Standards: Recipes for Reality. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Büthe, Tim. 2010. “Private Regulation in the Global Economy: A (P)Review.” Business and Politics 12 (3): 1–38.Google Scholar

  • Büthe, Tim and Walter Mattli. 2011. The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Callon, Michel, Cécile Méadel, and Vololona Rabeharisoa. 2002. “The Economy of Qualities.” Economy and Society 31 (2): 194–217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cargill, Carl F. 1989. Information Technology Standardization: Theory, Process and Organisations. Bedford MA: Digital Press.Google Scholar

  • CHESSS Consortium. 2009a. Consolidated Report on the Feasibility Study in Response to EU Mandate M/371. CEN’s Horizontal European Services Standardization Strategy.Google Scholar

  • CHESSS Consortium. 2009b. Module 4 & 5, The Customer Satisfaction Continuum. Customer Satisfaction Assessment, Responding to Complaints, Redress, Provision and Dispute Resolution. Final Report. CEN’s Horizontal European Services Standardization Strategy.Google Scholar

  • CHESSS Consortium. 2009c. Module 7, The Specification, Sourcing, Delivery and Quality of Business-to-Business Services. Final Report. CEN’s Horizontal European Services Standardization Strategy.Google Scholar

  • Chiapello, Eve and Norman Fairclough. 2002. “Understanding the New Management Ideology: a Transdisciplinary Contribution from Critical Discourse Analysis and New Sociology of Capitalism.” Discourse Society 13 (2): 185–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cox, Robert W. 1992. “Global Perestroïka.” In Socialist Register, edited by Ralph Miliband and Leo Panitch. London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar

  • Cutler, A. Claire, Virginia Haufler and Tony Porter, eds. 1999. Private Authority and International Affairs. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

  • Czaya, Axel and Wilfried Hesser. 2001. “Standardization Systems as Indicators of Mental, Cultural and Socio-Economic States.” Knowledge, Technology & Policy 14 (3): 24–40.Google Scholar

  • DiMaggio, Paul J. and Walter W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Djelic, Marie-Laure and Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson, eds. 2006. Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Djellal, Faridah and Faïz Gallouj. 2010. “Services, Innovation and Performance: General Presentation.” Journal of Innovation Economics & Management 5 (1): 5–15.Google Scholar

  • Dobusch, Leonhard and Sigrid Quack. 2012. “Framing Standards, Mobilizing Users: Copyright Versus Fair Use in Transnational Regulation.” Review of International Political Economy 20 (1): 52–88.Google Scholar

  • Dossani, Rafiq and Martin Kenney. 2007. “The Next Wave of Globalization: Relocating Service Provision to India.” World Development 35 (5): 772–791.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Drèze, Jacques. 1989. “The Standard Goods Hypothesis.” In The European Internal Market, edited by Alexis Jacquemin and André Sapir. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Dudouet, François-Xavier, Delphine Mercier and Antoine Vion. 2006. “Politiques Internationales de Normalisation: Quelques Jalons pour la Recherche Empirique.” Revue Française de science politique 56 (3): 367–392.Google Scholar

  • du Tertre, Christian. 2013. “Configuration productives de services et internationalisation. Une approche régulationniste.” In Services sans frontières. mondialisation, normalisation et régulation de l’économie des services, edited by Jean-Christophe Graz and Nafi Niang. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar

  • Egan, Michelle. 2001. Constructing a European Market: Standards, Regulation, and Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Egyedi, Tineke. 2005. “Beyond Consortia, Beyond Standardization? Redefining the Consortium Problem.” In Advanced Topics in Information Technology Standards and Standardization Research, edited by Kai Jacobs. London: IGI Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Grande, Edgar and Louis W. Pauly, eds. 2005. Complex Sovereignty: Reconstituting Political Authority in the Twenty-First Century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

  • Graz, Jean-Christophe. 2006a. “Les hybrides de la mondialisation: Acteurs, objets et espaces de l’économie politique internationale.” Revue française de science politique 56 (5): 765–787.Google Scholar

  • Graz, Jean-Christophe. 2006b. “International Standardisation and Corporate Democracy.” In Global Norms in the Twenty-First Century, edited by Klaus-Gerd Giesen and Kees van der Pijl. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar

  • Graz, Jean-Christophe and Andreas Nölke, eds. 2008. Transnational Private Governance and Its Limits. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Graz, Jean-Christophe and Nafi Niang, eds. 2013. Services sans frontières. Mondialisation, normalisation et régulation de l’économie des services, Paris: Presses de Science Po.Google Scholar

  • Guler, Islin, Mauro F. Guillén and John Muir Macpherson. 2002. “Global Competition, Institutions, and the Diffusion of Organizational Practices: The International Spread of ISO 9000 Quality Certificates.” Administrative Science Quarterly 47: 207–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hall, Rodney Bruce and Thomas J. Bierstecker, eds. 2002. The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Higgins, Winton and Kristina Tamm Hallström. 2007. “Standardization, Globalization and the Rationalities of Government.” Organization 14 (5): 685–704.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Higgott, Richard, Geoffrey Underhill and Andreas Bieler, eds. 1999. Non-State Actors and Authority in the Global System. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • ISO. 2006. “Service Sectors Turn to Standards.” ISO Focus January: 7–40.Google Scholar

  • ISO. 2010. Assessing Economic Benefits of Consensus-Based Standards: The ISO Methodology. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar

  • Joerges, Christian, Karl-Heinz Ladeur and Ellen Vos. 1999. “The Law’s Problems with the Involvement of Non-Governmental Actors in Europe’s Legislative Processes: The Case of Standardisation under the ‘New Approach’.” In EUI Working Paper LAW No. 99/9. San Domenico: European University Institute.Google Scholar

  • Krause Hansen, Hans. 2008. “Investigation the Disaggregation, Innnovation, and Mediation of Authority in Global Politics.” In Critical Perspectives on Private Authority an Global Politics, edited by Hans Krause Hansen and Dorte Salskov-Iversen. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Lalonde, Carole and Olivier Boiral. 2012. “Managing Risks Through ISO 31000: A Critical Analysis.” Risk Management 14: 272–300.Google Scholar

  • Loconto, Allison and Lawrence Busch. 2010. “Standards, Techno-Economic Networks, and Playing Fields: Performing the Global Market Economy.” Review of International Political Economy 17 (3): 507–536.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Loya, Thomas A. and John Boli. 1999. “Standardization in the World Polity: Technical Rationality Over Power.” In Constructing World Culture, edited by John Boli and George M. Thomas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Mattli, Walter. 2001. “The Politics and Economics of International Institutional Standards Setting: An Introduction.” Journal of European Public Policy 8 (3): 328–344.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mattli, Walter and Tim Büthe. 2003. “Setting International Standards: Technological Rationality or Primacy of Power?” World Politics 56 (1): 1–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Murphy, Craig. 1994. International Organization and Industrial Change: Global Governance Since 1850. Cambridge (MA): Polity Press.Google Scholar

  • Murphy, Craig and JoAnne Yates. 2009. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Global Governance through Voluntary Consensus. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Nicolaïdis, Kalypso and Michelle Egan. 2001. “Transnational Market Governance and Regional Policy Externalities: Why Recognize Foreign Standards?” Journal of European Public Policy 8 (3): 454–473.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • NIST. 2009. “Selected Impacts of Documentary Standards Supported by Nist, 2008 Edition.” Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology, US Department of Commerce.Google Scholar

  • NIST. 2010. Thirteenth Annual Report on Federal Agency Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards and Conformity Assessment. Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology, US Department of Commerce.Google Scholar

  • OECD. 1999. “Regulatory Reform and International Standardisation.” Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Trade Committee Working Party.Google Scholar

  • Prakash, Aseem and Matther Potoski. 2006. “Racing to the Bottom? Trade, Environmental Governance, and ISO 14001.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 350–364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Prakash, Aseem and Matther Potoski. 2010. “The International Standards Organization as a Global Governor: a Club Theory Approach.” In Who Governs the Globe?, edited by Deborah D. Avant, Martha Finnemore and Susan Sell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Radu, Roxana, Jean-Marie Chenou and Rolf H. Weber, eds. 2013. The Evolution of Global Internet Governance: Principles and Policies in the Making. Zurich: Schulthess.Google Scholar

  • Ruwet, Coline. 2009. “Des Filetages à la RSE. Normalisation et Démocratie. Sociologie du Processus d’Élaboration d’ISO 26000.” Ph.D diss., Université catholique de Louvain.Google Scholar

  • Sako, Mari. 2009. “Outsourcing and Offshoring: Implications for Productivity of Business Services.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22 (4): 499–512.Google Scholar

  • Sassen, Saskia. 2003. “Globalization or Denationalization?” Review of International Political Economy 10 (1): 1–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sassen, Saskia. 2006. Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Schepel, Harm. 2005. The Constitution of Private Governance: Product Standards in the Regulation of Integrating Markets. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Schirm, Stefan A. ed. 2004. New Rules for Global Markets: Public and Private Governance in the World Economy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Schmidt, Susanne K. and Raymund Werle. 1998. Coordination Technology: Studies in the International Standardization of Telecommunication. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Schoechle, Timothy. 2009. Standardization and Digital Enclosure: The Privatization of Standards, Knowledge, and Policy in the Ages of Global Information Technology. Hershey (NY): Information Science Reference.Google Scholar

  • Small, Mario Louis. 2009. “ ‘How Many Cases Do I need?’ On Science and the Logic of Case Selection in Field-Based Research.” Ethnography 10 (1): 5–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spruyt, Hendrik. 2001. “The Supply and Demand of Governance in Standard-Setting: Insights from the Past.” Journal of European Public Policy 8 (3): 371–391.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sundbo, Jon. 2002. “The Service Economy: Standardisation or Customisation?” The Service Industries Journal 22 (4): 93–116.Google Scholar

  • Swann, Peter. 2000. The Economics of Standardization. Final Report for Standards and Technical Regulations Directorate Department of Trade and Industry. Manchester: Manchester Business School.Google Scholar

  • Tamm Hallström, Kristina. 2004. Organizing International Standardization: ISO and the IASC in Quest of Authority. Cheltenham: E. Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Tamm Hallström, Kristina and Magnus Boström. 2010. Transnational Multi-Stakeholder Standardization: Organizing Fragile Non-State Authority. Cheltenham: E. Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Taylor, Stephanie. 2001. “Locating and Conducting Discourse Analytical Research.” In Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis, edited by Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor and Simeon J. Yates. London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Tate, Jeffrey. 2001. “National Varieties of Standardization.” In Varieties of Capitalism, edited by Peter Hall and David Soskice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Temple, Paul and Geoffrey Williams. 2002. The Benefits of Standards: Trading with and within Europe. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization (CEN).Google Scholar

  • Tether, Bruce, Christiane Hipp and Ian Miles. 2001. “Standardisation and Particularisation in Services: Evidence from Germany.” Research Policy 30 (7): 1115–1138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Timmermans, Stefan and Steven Epstein. 2010. “A World of Standards But Not a Standard World: Toward a Sociology of Standards and Standardization.” Annual Review of Sociology 36: 69–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Toth, Robert B. 1984. The Economics of Standardization. Minneapolis: Standards Engineering Society.Google Scholar

  • Van Dijk, Teun A. 2001. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen and Heidi E. Hamilton. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Vogel, David. 1995. Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Vogel, David. 2009. “The Private Regulation of Global Corporate Conduct.” In The Politics of Global Regulation, edited by Walter Mattli and Ngaire Woods. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Vries, Henk de. 1999. Standards for the Nation: Analysis of National Standardization Organizations. Ph.D. diss., Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.Google Scholar

  • Werle, Raymund. 2001. “Institutional Aspects of Standardization – Jurisdictional Conflicts and the Choice of Standardization Organizations.” Journal of European Public Policy 8 (3): 392–410.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Winn, Jane K. 2009. “Globalization and Standards: The Logic of Two-Level Games.” I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society 5 (2): 185–218.Google Scholar

  • World Trade Organization. 2012. World Trade Report 2012. Trade and Public Policies: A Closer Look at Non-Tariff Measures in the 21st Century. Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar

  • Zuckerman, Amy. 1999. “Standards Battles Heat Up Between United States and European Union.” Quality Progress 32 (1): 39–42.Google Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Jean-Christophe Graz, Institut d’Etudes Politiques et Internationales, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, e-mail:


Published Online: 2013-12-05

Published in Print: 2014-04-01


Dossani and Kenney (2007); du Tertre (2013).

Blind (2003); ISO (2006); Graz and Niang (2013).

Authors’ interview with Alan Bryden, Secretary General of the ISO, Geneva, 8 June 2007.

Czaya and Hesser (2001); Tate (2001); Werle (2001); Mattli and Büthe (2003); Winn (2009).

DiMaggio and Powell (1983); Schmidt and Werle (1998: p. 58).

Egyedi (2005).

Egan (2001).

Statistics, available from http://unctadstat.unctad.org/. Accessed 26 November 2013.

Ibid.

Bryson and Daniels (2007); World Trade Organization (2012); du Tertre (2013).

Boden and Miles (2000: p. 258).

Blind (2004: p. 167).

Callon, Méadel, and Rabeharisoa (2002: pp. 197–207).

World Trade Organization (2012: p. 186).

The three European standardization bodies are: the CEN, the Comité Européen de Normalisation Electrotechnique (CENELEC) and the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI). The ETSI differs significantly from the CEN and CENELEC in that it accepts corporate as well as national members. For further analysis of the European context, see: Egan (2001); Schoechle (2009: p. 24).

See for instance: Egan (2001); Schepel (2005); Büthe and Mattli (2011).

Zuckerman (1999: p. 40); Czaya and Hesser (2001: p. 32).

Tate (2001); Mattli and Büthe (2003); Winn (2009).

Small (2009).

High-ranking officials interviewed belong to all the major bodies concerned in the international, American and European context of standardization: the American National Standard Institute (ANSI); the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM international), the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA), the Consumer Specialty Products Association (CPSA), the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), the Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN), the Association Française de Normalisation (AFNOR), the British Standards Institution (BSI), and the Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN).

Taylor (2001: pp. 8–9); Van Dijk (2001); Chiapello and Fairclough (2002).

Toth (1984); Cargill (1989); Drèze (1989); OECD (1999); Vries (1999); Swann (2000); Blind (2004).

Temple and Williams (2002); Blind and Jungmittag (2005); ISO (2010); Prakash and Potoski (2010).

Tether, Hipp, and Miles (2001); Sundbo (2002); Sako (2009); Djellal and Gallouj (2010).

Loya and Boli (1999); Brunsson, Jacobsson, and Associates (2000); Tamm Hallström (2004); Higgins and Tamm Hallström (2007); Ruwet (2009); Loconto and Busch (2010); Timmermans and Epstein (2010); Busch (2011); Brunsson, Rasche, and Seidl (2012); Dobusch and Quack (2012).

Timmermans and Epstein (2010: p. 83).

Abbott and Snidal (2001); Spruyt (2001); Vogel (2009).

Schmidt and Werle (1998); Mattli and Büthe (2003); Büthe and Mattli (2011).

Egan (2001); Nicolaïdis and Egan (2001); Tate (2001).

Egan (2001: p. 37).

See respectively: Czaya and Hesser (2001); Werle (2001).

Tate (2001: p. 472).

Winn (2009: p. 21).

Egyedi (2005).

Dudouet, Mercier, and Vion (2006: p. 389).

Schepel (2005: p. 4).

Cox (1992).

Murphy (1994); Murphy and Yates (2009).

See in particular: Cutler, Haufler, and Porter (1999); Higgott, Underhill, and Bieler (1999); Hall and Bierstecker (2002); Schirm (2004); Grande and Pauly (2005); Djelic and Sahlin-Andersson (2006); Graz and Nölke (2008); Krause Hansen (2008); Büthe (2010).

Radu, Chenou, and Weber (2013).

Graz and Nölke (2008: p. 12).

Sassen (2003); Sassen (2006).

Tamm Hallström and Boström (2010).

Graz (2006a,b).

The regime includes standards-setting, accreditation, and certification – three processes that “traverse and integrate public and private spheres both within and across nations” (Loconto and Busch 2010; p. 508).

ISO Bulletin, January 1995.

In 2011, the 25 ISO technical committees setting standards considered to belong to the service classification were extremely diverse as the following list indicates: TC 17 Steel; TC 28 Petroleum products and lubricants; TC 43 Food products; TC 68 Financial services; TC 69 Applications of statistical methods; TC 96 Cranes; TC 108 Mechanical vibration, shock and condition monitoring; TC 127 Earth-moving machinery; TC 135 Non-destructive testing; TC 138 Plastics pipes, fittings and valves for the transport of fluids; TC 176 Quality management and quality assurance; TC 182 Geotechnics; TC 204 Intelligent transport system; TC 210 Quality management and corresponding general aspects for medical devices; TC 212 Clinical laboratory testing and in vitro diagnostic test systems; TC 214 Elevating work platforms; TC 222 Personal Financial Planning; TC 223 Societal Security; TC 224 Service activities relating to drinking water supply system and wastewater systems; TC 225 Market, opinion and social research; TC 228 Tourism and related services; TC 232 Educational Services. There are also some so-called “project committees” with a mandate to establish only one document; see for instance: TC 235 Project Committee: Rating services; TC 236 Project Committee: Project Management; TC 237 Project committee: Exhibition terminology; TC 239 Project committee: Network services billing; TC 250 Project committee: Sustainability in event management.

Prakash and Potoski (2006); Guler, Guillén, and Macpherson (2002); Lalonde and Boiral (2012).

See ISO/TMB Resolution 18/2012, available from: <http://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink/fetch/-15620806/15620808/15623592/15788626/TMB_Communiqué_Issue_Nr._40_%28March_2012%29.pdf?nodeid=15787295&vernum=-2>. Accessed 18 October 2013.

The recent revision of the «ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1, Consolidated ISO Supplement – Procedures specific to ISO» was precisely intended to rule and harmonize the development of management system standards with the introduction in the annex SL of a “High level structure, identical core text and common terms and core definitions for use in Management Systems Standards.”

See ISO/TMB Resolution 17/2012, “Management Systems Standards in tourism and related services” available from: <http://www.iso.org/iso/copolco_priority-programme_annual-report_2012.pdf>. Accessed 18 October 2013.

There are regional standardization bodies, most notably in the Americas (Pan American Standards Commission, COPANT and Asociación Mercosur de Normalización, AMN) and in Asia-Pacific (Pacific Area Standards Congress, PASC) and in Africa (African Regional Organization for Standardization, ARSO). As compared to the European system, however, their influence is still weak.

For a discussion of the increasing reliance on standardization in European law making and public policy from a legal pluralism approach, see: Joerges, Ladeur, and Ellen (1999).

Vogel (1995); Egan (2001).

CHESSS (2009a).

CHESSS (2009b: p. 109).

CHESSS (2009c: p. 223).

A guidance document for drafting service standards was published by CEN in 2012, “CEN Guide 15, guidance document for the development of service standards.” Available from: <ftp://ftp.cen.eu/BOSS/Reference_Documents/Guides/CEN/CEN_15.pdf>. Accessed 16 October 2013.

CEN/CEN Management Centre, Summary, Background and Proposals related to European Commission Programming Mandate M/371 in the Field of Services n.d. April 2009. According to the report, standardization work should be initiated in the following areas: accessibility of transport and tourist services, project management services in the field of engineering consultancy, services for residential homes and older persons, reception services, IT- and non-IT service outsourcing, and smart house services.

Author’s interview with Pascal Gautier, Head of the Management and Services Unit, Afnor, Paris, 18 April 2007.

See for instance COM 2011(311) Final: “Progress in the development of European standards for services has, however, been slow and recent years have seen the rapid growth in service standards at the national rather than the European level, (453 new national standards in 2005–2009, as opposed to only 24 European).”

In particular, the standardization package integrates Directive 98/34/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding the “procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services” (22 June 1998) and the Decision 1673/2006/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financing of European standardization (24 October 2006).

See: <http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/european-standards/standardisation-policy/policy-review/results-public-consultation_en.htm>. Accessed 12 April 2012. Documents adopted in June 2011 by the European Commission are the following: Communication on a strategic vision for European standards – COM (2011) 311; Proposal for a Regulation on European Standardization – COM(2011)315.

Mattli (2001: p. 330).

Author’s interview with Gary Kushnier, Vice-President for international policy, ANSI, Washington D.C., 7 August 2009.

NIST (2010).

NIST (2009).

Represented governmental agencies include among others: Environmental Protection Agency, Food and Drug Administration, Department of Defense; industry members include among others: Motorola, IBM, Rockwell Automation, and Boeing; SDOs include among others: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, ASTM International, ASME, Underwriters Laboratories; civil society representatives include among others the National Consumer League and Consumers Union.

Authors’ interview with William Berger, Managing Director, ASME, and Bernard E. Hrubala, Sr. Vice President, ASME, and Division Manager of the Industrial Services Unit, TÜV Rheinland, New-York, 18 August 2009.

Authors’ interview with Bernard E. Hrubala, Sr. Vice President, ASME, and Division Manager of unit ‘Industrial Services’, TÜV Rheinland, New-York, 18 August 2009.

Authors’ interview with Katharine E. Morgan, Vice President, Technical Committee Operations, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 19 August 2009.

Authors’ interview with Belinda Lowenhaupt Collins, Director for Technology Services, NIST, Gaithersburg, 3 August 2009.

Authors’ interview with Gary Kushnier, Vice-President for International Policy, ANSI, interview with the authors, Washington D.C., 7 August 2009.

Authors’ interview with Katharine E. Morgan, Vice President, Technical Committee Operations, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 19 August 2009.

Idem.

Authors’ interview with William Berger, Managing Director, Asme, and Bernard E. Hrubala, Sr. Vice President, ASME, and Division Manager of the Industrial Services Unit, TÜV Rheinland, New-York, 18 August 2009.

Authors’ interview with Gary Kushnier, Vice-President for International Policy, ANSI, Washington D.C., 7 August 2009.

Idem.

Idem.

Egan (2001: pp. 33–38).

Authors’ interview with Ziva Patir, former ISO Vice President, Geneva, 8 June 2007.


Citation Information: Business and Politics, ISSN (Online) 1469-3569, ISSN (Print) 1369-5258, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2012-0009.

Export Citation

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in