Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Business and Politics

Editor-in-Chief: Aggarwal, Vinod K.


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.384
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.352
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.459

More options …
Volume 16, Issue 1 (Apr 2014)

Issues

The impact of meta-standardization upon standards convergence: the case of the international accounting standard for off-balance-sheet financing

Matthias Thiemann
Published Online: 2013-12-05 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2012-0011

Abstract

Analyses of transnational governance formation point to the destabilizing effects transnational standard setters have upon national institutional configurations. Isomorphic pressures, it is argued, lead to the standardization of procedures used and actors involved in standard setting processes. What is not clear, however, is to what extent this meta-standardization increases the chances for convergence of national with transnational standards. This article explores this question for the case of the international accounting standard for off-balance-sheet financing in the Netherlands, France and Germany. It argues that the reconfiguration of domestic governance architectures had a decisive impact on convergence processes. Counter-intuitively, copying goals, membership and procedures of the transnational, private International Accounting Standards Committee limited the chances of rule convergence, as it threatened to deinstitutionalize the standard-setting role of an important national champion of rule-convergence, the banking regulator. The institutional template developed at the transnational level created actor-mismatch at the national level between those formulating and those implementing the rules, thereby weakening the coalition for rule change. A strong coalition, however, is needed to overcome vested business interests that favor convergence with transnational templates for legitimacy gains at the same time that they oppose convergence to contentious rules that limit their business activities.

References

  • Abbott, Kenneth and Duncan Snidal. 2009. “The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards, Institutions and the Shadow of the State: Regulatory Standards, Institutions and the Shadow of the State.” In The Politics of Global Regulation, edited by Walter Mattli and Ngaire Woods. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Acharya, Viral V. and Phillip Schnabl. 2009. “Do Global Banks Spread Global Imbalances? The Case of Asset-Backed Commercial Paper During the Financial Crisis of 2007–2009.” Paper Presented at the 10th Jacques Polak Annual Research Conference, The International Monetary Fund Washington, DC.Google Scholar

  • Acharya, Viral V., Phillip Schnabl, and Gustavo Suarez. 2009. “Securitization without Risk Transfer.” Paper Presented at the Research Seminar, The Federal Reserve Board of Governers, Richmond, VA.Google Scholar

  • Baker, C. Richard and Elena M. Barbu. 2007. “Evolution of Research on International Accounting Harmonization: a Historical and Institutional Perspective.” Socio-Economic Review 5 (4): 603–632.Google Scholar

  • Ballwieser, Wolfgang. 2010. “Germany.” In A Global History of Accounting, Financial Reporting and Public Policy: Europe. Studies in the Development of Accounting Thought, edited by Gary. J. Previts, Peter J. Walton and Peter Wolnizer. Sydney, Australia: Emerald.Google Scholar

  • Benston, George J., Michael Bromwich, Robert E. Litan, and Wagenhofer Alfred. 2006. Worldwide Financial Reporting: The Development and Future of Financial Reporting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Biener, Herbert. 2000. “Das DRSC: Aufgaben und Perspektiven.” In Die Zukunft des deutschen Bilanzrechts im Zeichen internationaler Rechnungslegung und privater Standardsetzung, edited by Detlef Kleindiek and Wolfgang Oehler. Koeln: Dr. Otto Schmidt.Google Scholar

  • Black, Julia. 2008. “Forms and Paradoxes of Principles Based Regulation.” London School of Economics, Law, Society and Economy Working Paper: 1–36.Google Scholar

  • Bocqueraz, Claude. 2010. “France.” In A Global History of Accounting, Financial Reporting and Public Policy: Europe. Studies in the Development of Accounting Though, edited by Gary J. Previts, Peter J. Walton, and Peter Wolnizer. Sydney, Australia: Emerald.Google Scholar

  • Botzem, Sebastian. 2012. The Politics of Accounting Regulation – Organizing Transnational Standard Setting in Financial Reporting. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Botzem, Sebastian and Sigrid Quack. 2006. “International Standard-Setting in Accounting.” In Transnational Governance. Institutional Dynamics of Regulation, edited by Marie-Laure Djelic and Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Botzem, Sebastian and Sigrid Quack. 2009. “(No) Limits to Anglo-American Accounting? Reconstructing the History of the International Accounting Standards Committee: A Review Article.” Accounting, Organization and Society 34 (8): 988–998.Google Scholar

  • Botzem, Sebastian and Leonhard Dobusch. 2012. “Standardization Cycles: A Process Perspective on the Formation and Diffusion of Transnational Standards.” Organization Studies 33 (5–6): 737–762.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Büthe, Tim. 2010(a). “Private Regulation in the Global Economy: A (P) Review.” Business and Politics 12 (3): 1–40.Google Scholar

  • Büthe, Tim. 2010(b). “Engineering Uncontestedness? The Origins and Institutional Development of the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC).” Business and Politics 12 (3): 1–62.Google Scholar

  • Büthe, Tim and Walter Mattli. 2011. The New Global Rulers. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Burlaud, Alain and Bernard Colasse. 2010. “International Accounting Standardization: is Politics Back?” Comptabilité – Contrôle – Audit 16 (3): 153–176.Google Scholar

  • Camfermann, Kees and Stephen Zeff. 2007. Financial Reporting and Global Capital Markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Chantiri-Chaudemanche, Ruba. 2009. 2nd. edition. “Organismes de Normalisation.” In Encyclopédie de Comptabilité, contrôle de gestion et audit, edited by Bernard Colasse. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar

  • Chantiri-Chaudemanche, Ruba and Christine Pochet. 2012. “La normalisation comptable: l’expert, le politique et la mondialisation.” In Comptabilité, Société, Politique, edited by Marc Nikitin and Chrystelle Richard. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar

  • Choi, F. and G. K. Meek. 2005. International Accounting. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

  • Clift, Ben and Cornelia Woll. 2012. “Economic Patriotism: Reinventing Control Over Open Markets.” Journal of European Public Policy 19 (3): 307–323.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Colasse, Bernard and Christine Pochet. 2009. “The Genesis of the 2007 Conseil National de la Comptabilite: A Case of Institutional Isomorphism?” Accounting in Europe 6 (1): 25–55.Google Scholar

  • Cooper, David and Keith Robson. 2006. “Accounting, Professions and Regulation: Locating the Sites of Professionalization.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 31 (4/5): 415–444.Google Scholar

  • DiMaggio, Paul and Walter Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Djelic, Marie-Laure. 1998. Exporting the American Model: The Postwar Transformation of Business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Djelic, Marie-Laure. 2003. “Introduction.” In Globalizations and Institutions: Redefining the Rules of the Economic Game, edited by Marie-Laure Djelic and Sigrid Quack. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Djelic, Marie-Laure. 2007. “Overcoming Path Dependency: Path Generation in Open Systems.” Theory and Society 36 (2): 161–186.Google Scholar

  • Djelic, Marie-Laure. 2008. “Institutions and Transnationalization.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by Royston Greenwood et al. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Djelic, Marie-Laure. 2011. “The Power of Limited Liability: Transnational Communities and Cross-Border Governance.” In Communities and Organizations (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Volume 33), edited by Christopher Marquis, Michael Lounsbury and Royston Greenwood. Bingley, UK: Emerald Books.Google Scholar

  • Eaton, Sarah. 2005. “Crisis and the Consolidation of International Accounting Standards: Enron, the IASB, and America.” Business and Politics 7 (3): 1–20.Google Scholar

  • Ebbinghaus, Bernhard. 2005. “When Less is More: Selection Problems in Large- N and Small- N Cross-National Comparisons.” International Sociology 20 (2): 133–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • European Commission. 1995. Accounting Harmonization: A New Strategy vis-à-vis International Harmonization. Commission Communication COM 95 (508).Google Scholar

  • European Commission. 1999. Financial Services-Implementing the Framework for Financial Markets: Action Plan. Commission Communication of 11.05.1999 COM (1999) 232.Google Scholar

  • European Commission. 2000. EU Financial Reporting Strategy: the Way Forward. Commission Communication (2000) 359.Google Scholar

  • European Parliament. 2002. REGULATION (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002 on the Application of International Accounting Standards. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32002R1606:EN:HTML.

  • European Securitization Forum. 2002. Letter to IASB Re: Consolidation and SIC 12. Accessible at: www.sifma.org/workarea/downloadasset.aspx?id=1022; last accessed April 21, 2012.

  • Fiss, Peer C. 2009. “Case Studies and the Configurational Analysis of Organizational Phenomena.” In The Sage Handbook of Case Based Methods, edited by David Byrne and Charles Ragin. London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Fuchs, Doris and Agni Kalfagianni. 2010. “The Causes and Consequences of Private Food Governance.” Business and Politics 12 (3): 1–34.Google Scholar

  • George, Alexander L. and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Gorton, Gary B. 2010. Slapped by the Invisible Hand: The Panic of 2007. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Green, Jessica F. 2010. “Private Standards in the Climate Regime: The Greenhouse Gas Protocol.” Business and Politics 12 (3): 1–37.Google Scholar

  • Hall, Peter and David Soskice (eds.). 2001. Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hall, Peter and Kathleen Thelen. 2009. “Institutional Change in Varieties of Capitalism.” Socio-Economic Review 7 (1): 7–34.Google Scholar

  • Halliday, Terrence C. 2009. “Recursivity of Global Normmaking: A Sociolegal Agenda.” Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences 5: 263–289.Google Scholar

  • Halliday, Terrence C. and Bruce G. Carruthers. 2007. “The Recursivity of Law: Global Norm Making and National Lawmaking in the Globalization of Corporate Insolvency Regimes.” American Journal of Sociology 112 (4): 1135–1202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harvey, David. L. 2009. “Complexity and Case.” In The Sage Handbook of Case Based Methods, edited by David Byrne and Charles C. Ragin. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Hellwig, Martin. 2010. “Finanzmarktregulierung-Welche Regelungen empfehlen sich für den deutschen und europäischen Finanzsektor.” In Verhandlungen des 68. Juristentages, edited by Ständige Deputation des Deutschen Juristentages. Muenchen: Verlag C.H. Beck.Google Scholar

  • Hoarau, Christian. 2010. “La nouvelle gouvernance du normalisateur comptable Français.” In La gouvernance juridique des organisations, edited by Jean- Luc Rossignol. Paris: Editions Lavoisier.Google Scholar

  • International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC). 1989. Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements. International Accounting Standards Committee, 166 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2DY, United Kingdom.Google Scholar

  • Jeffrey, Peter. 2002. “International Harmonization of Accounting Standards, and the Question of Off-Balance Sheet Treatment.” Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 12: 341–351.Google Scholar

  • Larsson, Robert K. 2008. “Examination of Comment Letters Submitted to the IASC: Special Purpose Entities.” Research in Accounting Regulation 20: 27–47.Google Scholar

  • Malets, Olga. 2013. “The Translation of Transnational Voluntary Standards into Practices: Civil Society and the Forest Stewardship Council in Russia.” Journal of Civil Society 9 (3): 300–324.Google Scholar

  • Martinez-Diaz, Leo. 2005. “Strategic Experts and Improvising Regulators: Explaining the IASC’s Rise to Global Influence, 1973–2001.” Business and Politics 7 (3): 1–22.Google Scholar

  • Mattli, Walter and Tim Büthe. 2005. “Global Private Governance: Lessons from a National Model of Setting Standards.” Accounting, Law and Contemporary Problems 68 (3/4): 225–262.Google Scholar

  • Mattli, Walter and Ngaire Woods. 2009. “In Whose Benefit? Explaining Regulatory Change in Global Politics.” In The Politics of Global Regulation, edited by Walter Mattli and Ngaire Woods. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Mayntz, Renate. 2009. Über Governance – Institutionen und Prozesse Politischer Regelung. New York: Campus-Verlag.Google Scholar

  • McLeay, Stuart, Ordelheide Dieter and Steven Young. 2000. “Constituent Lobbying and Its Impact on the Development of Financial Reporting Regulations Evidence from Germany.” Accounting, Organization and Society 25 (1): 79–102.Google Scholar

  • Meyer, John and Brian Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morgan, Glenn. 2005. “Institutional Complementarities, Path Dependency and the Dynamics of Firms.” In Changing Capitalisms? Internationalization, Institutional Change and Systems of Economic Organization, edited by Glenn Morgan et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Mosley, Layna. 2010. “Regulating Globally, Implementing Locally: The Financial Codes and Standards Effort.” Review of International Political Economy 17: (4): 724–761.Google Scholar

  • Noelke, Andreas. 2005. “Introduction to the Special Issue: The Globalization of Accounting Standards.” Business and Politics 7 (3): 1–7.Google Scholar

  • Noelke, Andreas and James Perry. 2007. “The Power of Transnational Private Governance: Financialization and the IASB.” Business and Politics 9 (3): 1–27.Google Scholar

  • Peltzman, Samuel. 1976. “Towards a More General Theory of Regulation.” Journal of Law and Economics 19: 211–240.Google Scholar

  • Posner, Elliott. 2010. “Sequence as Explanation: The International Politics of Accounting Standards.” Review of International Political Economy 17 (4): 639–664.Google Scholar

  • Ramirez, Carlos. 2010. “Promoting Transnational Professionalism: Forays of the ‘Big Firm’ Accounting Community in France.” In Transnational Communities, edited by Marie-Laure Djelic and Sigrid Quack. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Richardson, Alan J. and Burkard Eberlein. 2011. “Legitimating Transnational Standard- Setting: The Case of the International Accounting Standards Board.” Journal of Business Ethics 98 (2): 217–245.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Skocpol, Theda and Margaret Somers. 1980. “The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 22 (2): 174–197.Google Scholar

  • Stigler, George J. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economic and Management Science 2: 3–21.Google Scholar

  • Strasser, Kurt and Phillip Blumberg. 2011. “Legal Form and Economic Substance of Enterprise Groups: Implications for Legal Policy.” Accounting, Economics and the Law 1 (4): 1–30.Google Scholar

  • Streeck, Wolfgang and Kathleen Thelen. 2005. Institutional Changes in Advanced Political Economies. In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, edited by Wolfgang Streeck and Kathleen Thelen. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Tamm Hallström, Kristina. 2004. Organizing international standardization. ISO and the IASC in quest of authority. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Thiemann, M. 2012. “Out of the Shadow? Accounting for Special Purpose Entities in European banking systems.” Competition and Change 16 (1): 37–55.Google Scholar

  • Timmermans, Stefan and Steven Epstein. 2010. “A World of Standards but not a Standard World: Toward a Sociology of Standards and Standardization.” Annual Review of Sociology 36: 69–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Hulle, Karl. 1993. “Harmonization of Accounting Standards in the EC. Is it the Beginning or is it the End?” European Accounting Review 2 (2): 387–396.Google Scholar

  • Walton, Peter. 2008. La comptabilité anglo-saxon. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

  • Zeff, Stephen A., Frans Van der Wel and Kees Camfferman. 2002. “A Reflection on Company Financial Reporting After 10 years.” Externe Verslaggeving November 2002: 513–519.Google Scholar

  • Zimmermann, Jochen, Joerg R. Werner and Philipp B. Volmer. 2008. Global Governance in Accounting- Rebalancing Public Power and Private Commitment. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Matthias Thiemann, Goethe Universitaet Frankfurt, Grueneburgplatz 1, 60323 Frankfurt am Main, Germany, Tel.: +496979836676, e-mail:


Published Online: 2013-12-05

Published in Print: 2014-04-01


Fuchs and Kalfagianni (2010); Green (2010).

Büthe and Mattli (2011).

Focal refers to the holding uncontested authority on the transnational level. Büthe (2010b) analyzes the stages and mechanisms of how a transnational standard setter reaches such a focal position.

Biener (2000); Büthe and Mattli (2011: p. 12f).

Baker and Barbu (2007: p. 607); Botzem (2012: p. 122); Chantiri-Chaudemanche (2009: p. 1118); Colasse and Pochet (2009: p. 50).

Clift and Woll (2012).

Büthe (2010a: p. 5); Mosley (2010).

Hall and Thelen (2009).

Büthe (2010b); Büthe and Mattli (2011: p. 137).

Green (2010).

Martinez-Diaz (2005); Noelke (2005); Botzem and Quack (2006); Büthe and Mattli (2011).

Up until 2001 the body issued International Accounting Standards (hereafter IAS), since 2001 its standards are called the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Posner 2010 gives a good description of the ascendance of the IASB.

Zimmermann, Werner, and Volmer (2008) similarly study the changing role of the state in accounting governance due to globalization in the US, UK and Germany, but they do not focus in particular on the transnational challenge the IASB is posing.

Botzem (2012); Botzem and Dobusch (2012).

Timmermans and Epstein (2010: p. 75).

It is notable that the favourable comparison of SIC 12 to American standards for off-balance-sheet financing increased the reputation of the IAS (Eaton 2005).

Acharya, Schnabl, and Suarez (2009); Gorton (2010).

Abbreviated as ANIME, Abbott and Snidal (2009: p. 46).

A related analysis concerning the adoption of transnational financial standards is Mosley (2010).

Stigler (1971); Peltzman (1976).

Mattli and Woods (2009: p. 17).

Abbott and Snidal (2009: p. 63f).

Halliday and Carruthers (2007: p. 1154).

Ibid., p. 1173.

Malets (2013: p. 320).

Mosley (2010: p. 754).

Djelic and Quack (2008: p. 317f), for the case of accounting, s. Noelke and Perry (2007).

Cf. Hall and Soskice (2001).

Djelic and Quack (2007: p. 162), also Morgan (2005: p. 441).

Djelic and Quack (2007: p. 162).

Abbott and Snidal (2009: p. 70).

Jepperson (1991: p. 145) quoted in Djelic and Quack (2003).

Mayntz (2009: p. 80f).

Djelic and Quack (2011: 89f); Ramirez (2010).

DiMaggio and Powell (1983).

Büthe and Mattli (2011: p. 12f).

Ibid., 167.

Cooper and Robson (2006: p. 416).

Also Botzem and Dobusch (2012).

Cooper and Robson (2006: p. 425).

For the case of global law, s. Halliday (2009: p. 277); Halliday and Carruthers (2007: p. 1152).

Abbott and Snidal (2009: p. 46), for the implementation of global norms in local contexts, Mosley (2010: p. 725f).

Baker and Barbu (2007: p. 607); Chantiri-Chaudemanche (2009: p. 1118); Colasse and Pochet (2009: p. 50); Botzem (2012: p. 122).

Such as the EU directives on accounting and the decision to make IAS the European accounting standards.

The inadequacy of French and German accounting standards was acknowledged in 1998 by granting an option for large conglomerates to exclusively apply US GAAP or IAS for their consolidated financial statements (Camfermann and Zeff 2007: p. 314).

Numbers add up to 59 rather than 53, because some interviewees held several functions, e.g., member of auditors’ association and external auditors.

Skocpol and Somers (1980); Ebbinghaus (2005: p. 141); George and Bennett (2005: p. 91).

Fiss (2009: p. 425); Harvey (2009).

Van Hulle (1993); European Commission (1995).

Daimler’s switch to US GAAP in 1993 is seen as a major event in this respect, s. Camfermann and Zeff (2007: p. 314).

Ibid.

Ibid., p. 329.

EC (1995: p. 6f).

s. European Commission (1999, 2000); European Parliament (2002).

Camfermann and Zeff (2007: p. 314).

Benston et al. (2006).

Biener (2000); Hoarau (2010).

Botzem (2012: p. 28).

Ibid., p. 29.

Botzem (2012: p. 29f).

Botzem and Quack (2009); critical Burlaud and Colasse (2010).

Colasse and Pochet (2009: p. 34f).

Botzem (2012: p. 117ff).

Botzem and Quack (2009: p. 994); Richardson and Eberlein (2011: p. 224f).

Walton (2008).

Chantiri-Chaudemanche and Pochet (2012: p. 152).

IASC (1989).

Tamm-Hallstroem (2004).

Martinez-Diaz (2005: p. 20).

Colasse and Pochet (2009).

Inter alia Mattli and Büthe (2005: p. 255).

Zeff, Van der Wel, and Camfferman (2002).

Ballwieser (2010); Bocqueraz (2010).

In 2011, the IASB issued the IFRS 10, which fuses IAS 27 and SIC 12. It generalized the economic substance approach to control which SIC 12 introduced for special purpose entities to all subsidiaries, available at: http://www.focusifrs.com/menu_gauche/normes_et_interpretations/textes_des_normes_et_interpretations/ifrs_10_etats_financiers_consolides, last accessed 07.11.2013.

Strasser and Blumberg (2011).

Acharya and Schnabl (2009).

Black (2008: p. 26).

Interview member IASB, 22 February 2011.

Larsson (2008).

European Securitization Forum (2002); Jeffrey (2002).

Acharya and Schnabl (2009); Hellwig (2010).

See Choi and Meek (2005: p. 85).

See Camfermann and Zeff (2007: p. 414).

Interview Dutch regulatory advisor, 06 October 2011.

Consultation also included the general accounting standards setter (interview former president accounting standard setting body, 16 August 2011).

Interview former president of the Dutch auditors’ association, 08 March 2012.

Ibid., 16 August 2011.

Ibid., 16 August 2011.

Ibid.

Interview Dutch Auditor’s Association, 05 July 2011.

Interview former leading standard setter in the Netherlands, 16 August 2011.

Interview member of the Dutch auditors association, 05 July 2011.

See Guidelines for Annual Reporting 2001, Chapter 2.14 Article 203 and 203c.

Interview auditors association 05 July 2011.

Interview bank manager in Netherlands, 06 December 2011.

See Hoarau (2010: p. 312), who emphasizes the great variety of interests and collegial deliberation.

Interview CNC member, 27 November 2011, interview member of Order of French Accountants 21 March 2011.

See Hoarau (2010: p. 316).

This committee was called “Comité de la Règlementation Bancaire et Financière.”

Ibid.

Interview members of the Order of French Accountants, 21 March 2011.

Ibid.

Interview a member of the CNC working group for banks, 22 March 2011.

Interview banking manager and member sub-committee, 25 March 2011; interview with two officials of the CNC, 02 April 2011, interview high functionary of CNC, 02 June 2011.

Interview French banking regulator, 06 February 2011.

CRC refers to the comité de la règlementation comptable which transposed proposals by the CNC into law. The full text of the CRC 99-02 is available at: http://www.articles.exafi.com/compta/ComptaTextes/CRC99-02.htm, last accessed 07.11.2013.

Interview CNC member, 21 January 2012.

Interview auditor big four Paris, former member of the CNC working group for banks, 22 March 2011.

7th EU Directive, Article 1.c., available at: http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/internal_market/businesses/company_law/l26010_en.htm, last accessed 07.11.2013.

Interview CNC member and with former employee of the banking regulator, 30 January 2011.

Loi n° 2003-706 de sécurité financière, available at: http://www.assetrecovery.org/kc/node/2cb8acd0-a34a-11dc-bf1b-335d0754ba85.0;jsessionid=4B6D2DB9CC618947BD24825FD304DEC0, last accessed 07.11.2013.

Interview German accounting professor, 30 June 2011.

McLeay, Dieter, and Young (2000).

In the realm of consolidated financial statements, the German auditors association (IDW) informally filled this void by providing statements on questions of accounting (called HFA RS).

Camfermann and Zeff (2007: p. 314).

The different option were enshrined in § 342a and § 342b of the German Commercial Code.

Interview German financial regulator, 01 July 2011, and interview board member German auditors association, 03 May 2011.

See Camfermann and Zeff (2007: p. 14).

Benston et al. (2006: p. 130).

At the time of its founding, there were expectations of a large scale reform to converge the rules for consolidated final statements upon IAS, if possible until 2002 (see Biener 2000: p. 63).

Interview official of the ministry of justice, 4 May 2011.

Interview auditor and member of DRSC, 21 February 2011; interview with IDW officials, 14 April 2011; interview with IDW board member, 03 May 2011.

See E-DRS 16. Available at: http://www.drsc.de/docs/drafts/16.html, last accessed 07.11.2013.

Interview board member of the German standard setting body, 11 December 2010.

The german text can be found at http://www.standardsetter.de/drsc/docs/comments/016/bakred.html.

Interview German financial regulator, 01 July 2011.

This orientation was supported by overlap in staff, most prominently the current president of the DRSC, who was the technical director at the IASC from 1995 to 1999.

Interview member DRSC, 06 December 2010.

Interview auditor involved in the reform process, 30 May 2011. A banking manager from a private bank also pointed to public banks as the main lobbying force (interview, 12 July 2011).

Ibid.

Djelic (1998: p. 224).

Hall and Thelen (2009: p. 18).

Meyer and Rowan (1977).

Streeck and Thelen (2005).

Büthe (2010b); Büthe and Mattli (2011: p. 137).

Green (2010).

Mosley (2010: p. 741).


Citation Information: Business and Politics, ISSN (Online) 1469-3569, ISSN (Print) 1369-5258, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2012-0011.

Export Citation

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in