Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Business and Politics

Editor-in-Chief: Aggarwal, Vinod K.


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.384
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.352
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.459

More options …
Volume 16, Issue 1 (Apr 2014)

Issues

Explaining variation in the multiplicity of private social and environmental regulation: a multi-case integration across the coffee, forestry and textile sectors

Marie-France Turcotte
  • Corresponding author
  • Département Stratégie, Responsabilité Sociale et Environnementale, École des Sciences de la Gestion, Université du Québec à Montréal, C.P. 6192, succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal (Québec) Canada H3C 4R2
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Juliane Reinecke / Frank den Hond
  • Hanken School of Economics (and VU University, Amsterdam), Department of Management and Organization, PO Box 479, 00101 Helsinki, Finland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2013-12-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2012-0016

Abstract

Amid concerns for a regulatory void in transnational fields, the principle of private regulation has become institutionalized. Many sectors have seen the emergence of multiple and overlapping standards. When comparing the sectors, there is considerable variation in standard multiplicity. We build on three institutional perspectives that have been put forward to explain the emergence of sustainability standards – the economic, idealist and political-institutional perspectives – to analyze the phenomenon of standard multiplicity. Each perspective reflects a different kind of action logic and is simultaneously present and accessible to various parties involved. Based on a cross-sector analysis of standards multiplicity in the forestry, coffee and textile sectors, this article seeks to make two contributions. First, whereas these three perspectives have been presented as competing, we propose that they are complementary in offering partial explanations for different episodes in the dynamics underlying standards multiplicity in different sectors. Second, whereas most studies have analyzed standard setting in single sectors and thus have understood it as being an intra-sector phenomenon, our cross-sector analysis of the dynamics of standard setting suggests that it is propelled by both sector-specific contingencies and experiences as well as by the experiences from other sectors.

References

  • Aoudji, Augustin K.N., Anselme Adégbidi, Valentin Agbo, Gilbert Atindogbé, Mireille S.S. Toyi, Armand S.I. Yêvidé, Jean C. Ganglo, and Philippe Lebailly. 2012. “Functioning of Farm-Grown Timber Value Chains: Lessons from the Smallholder-Produced Teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) Poles Value Chain in Southern Benin.” Forest Policy and Economics 15: 98–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Auld, Graeme and Benjamin Cashore. 2012. “The Forest Stewardship Council.” In Business Regulation and Non-State Actors: Whose Standards? Whose development?, edited by Peter Utting, Darryl Reed and Ananya Reed, 134–147. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Auld, Graeme, Lars H. Gulbrandsen, and Constance L. McDermott. 2008. “Certification Schemes and the Impacts on Forests and Forestry.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33: 187–211.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bartley, Tim. 2007. “Institutional Emergence in an Era of Globalization: The Rise of Transnational Private Regulation of Labor and Environmental Conditions.” American Journal of Sociology 113 (2): 297–351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bartley, Tim. 2011. “Certification as a Mode of Social Regulation.” In Handbook of the Politics of Regulation, edited by David Levi-Faur, 441–452. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar

  • Bernstein, Steven and Benjamin Cashore. 2007. “Can Non-State Global Governance Be Legitimate? An Analytical Framework.” Regulation and Governance 1 (4): 347–371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brunsson, Nils, Andreas Rasche, and David Seidl. 2012. “The Dynamics of Standardization: Three Perspectives on Standards in Organization Studies.” Organization Studies 33 (5/6): 613–632.Google Scholar

  • Cashore, Benjamin. 2002. “Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance.” Governance-An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 15 (4): 503–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cashore, Benjamin, Graeme Auld, and Deanne Newsom. 2003. “Forest Certification (Eco- labeling) Programs and their Policy-Making Authority: Explaining Divergence among North American and European Case Studies.” Journal of Forest Policy and Economics 5 (3): 225–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cashore, Benjamin, Graeme Auld, and Deanne Newsom. 2004. “The United States’ Race to Certify Sustainable Forestry: Non-State Environmental Governance and the Competition for Policy-Making Authority.” Business and Politics 5 (3): 219–259.Google Scholar

  • Cashore, Benjamin, Graeme Auld, James Lawson, and Deanna Newsom. 2007a. “The Future of Non-State Authority on Canadian Staples Industries: Assessing the Emergence of Forest Certification.” Policy and Society 26 (1): 71–91.Google Scholar

  • Cashore, Benjamin, Graeme Auld, Steven Bernstein, and Constance McDermott. 2007b. “Can Non-State Governance ‘Ratchet Up’ Global Environmental Standards? Lessons from the Forest Sector.” Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 16 (2): 158–172.Google Scholar

  • Conroy, Michael E. 2007. Branded! How the “Certification Revolution” Is Transforming Global Corporations. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar

  • den Hond, Frank, Frank G. A. de Bakker, Peter Neergaard, and Jean-Pascal Gond. 2007. “Managing Corporate Social Responsibility in Action: Reconciling Rhetorical Harmony and Practical Dissonance.” In Managing Corporate Social Responsibility in Action: Talking, Doing and Measuring, edited by Frank den Hond, Frank G. A. de Bakker and Peter Neergaard, 205–226. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Dingwerth, Klaus and Philipp Pattberg. 2009. “World Politics and Organizational Fields: The Case of Transnational Sustainability Governance.” European Journal of International Relations 15 (4): 707–743.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dubuisson-Quellier, Sophie. 2013. “A Market Mediation Strategy: How Social Movements Seek to Change Firms’ Practices by Promoting New Principles of Product Valuation.” Organization Studies 34 (5–6): 683–703.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Espinoza, Omar, Urs Buehlmann, and Bob Smith. 2012. “Forest Certification and Green Building Standards: Overview and Use in the U.S. Hardwood Industry.” Journal of Cleaner Production 33: 30–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2010. “Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 – main report.” FAO Forestry Paper No. 163.Google Scholar

  • Fransen, Luc W. 2010. Minding Their Own Business? Firms and Activists in the Making of Private Labour Regulation. Amsterdam, NL: Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar

  • Fransen, Luc W. 2011. “Why Do Private Governance Organizations Not Converge? A Political-Institutional Analysis of Transnational Labor Standards Regulation.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 24 (2): 359–387.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fransen, Luc W. 2012. “Multi-Stakeholder Governance and Voluntary Programme Interactions: Legitimation Politics in the Institutional Design of Corporate Social Responsibility.” Socio-Economic Review 10 (1): 163–192.Google Scholar

  • Gendron, Corinne, Véronique Bisaillon, and Ana Isabel Otero Rance. 2009. “The Institutionalization of Fair Trade: More than Just a Degraded Form of Social Action.” Journal of Business Ethics 86 (1): 63–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gilbert, Dirk U., Andreas Rasche, and Sandra Waddock. 2011. “Accountability in a Global Economy: The Emergence of International Accountability Standards.” Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (1): 23–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haack, Patrick, Dennis Schoeneborn, and Christopher Wickert. 2012. “Talking the Talk, Moral Entrapment, Creeping Commitment? Exploring Narrative Dynamics in Corporate Responsibility Standardization.” Organization Studies 33 (5–6): 815–845.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hassel, Anke. 2008. “The Evolution of a Global Labor Governance Regime.” Governance 21 (2): 231–251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jamali, Dima. 2010. “MNCs and International Accountability Standards through an Institutional Lens: Evidence of Symbolic Conformity or Decoupling.” Journal of Business Ethics 95 (4): 617–640.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • King, Andrew A. and Michael J. Lenox. 2000. “Industry Self-Regulation without Sanctions: The Chemical Industry’s Responsible Care Program.” Academy of Management Journal 43 (4): 698–716.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Low, William and Eileen Davenport. 2005. “Postcards from the Edge: Maintaining the ‘Alternative’ Character of Fair Trade.” Sustainable Development 13 (3): 143–153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manning, Stephan, Frank Boons, Olivier von Hagen, and Juliane Reinecke. 2012. “National Contexts Matter: The Co-Evolution of Sustainability Standards in Global Value Chains.” Ecological Economics 83: 197–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • March, James G. and Johan P. Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

  • McCarthy, John D. and Mayer N. Zald. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 82 (6): 1212–1241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCaffrey, Sarah and Nancy Kurland. 2013. “Who Defines ‘Local’? Resistance to Harmonizing Standards in Ethical Markets.” Business and Politics 16 (1): 191–219.Google Scholar

  • Meidinger, Errol. 2006. “The Administrative Law of Global Private-Public Regulation: The Case of Forestry.” European Journal of International Law 17 (1): 47–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meyer, John W. 2010. “World Society, Institutional Theories, and the Actor”. Annual Review of Sociology 36 (1): 1–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Micheletti, Michele. 2003. Political Virtue and Shopping: Individuals, Shopping and Collective Action. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Mueller, Martin, Virginia Gomes dos Santos, and Stefan Seuring. 2009. “The Contribution of Environmental and Social Standards Towards Ensuring Legitimacy in Supply Chain Governance.” Journal of Business Ethics 89 (4): 509–523.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mutersbaugh, Tad. 2005. “Fighting Standards with Standards: Harmonization, Rents, and Social Accountability in Certified Agrofood Networks.” Environment and Planning A 37 (11): 2033–2051.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Olson, Mancur. 2000 [1965]. The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • O’Rourke, Dara. 2004. Community-Driven Regulation: Balancing Development and the Environment in Vietnam. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Overdevest, Christine. 2010. “Comparing Forest Certification Schemes: The Case of Ratcheting Standards in the Forest Sector.” Socio-Economic Review 8 (1): 47–76.Google Scholar

  • Petkova, Iva. 2006. “Shifting Regimes of Governance in the Coffee Market: From Secular Crisis to a New Equilibrium?” Review of International Political Economy 13 (2): 313–339.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Prakash, Aseem and Matthew Potoski. 2007. “Collective Action through Voluntary Environmental Programs: A Club Theory Perspective.” Policy Studies Journal 35 (4): 773–792.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rasche, Andreas and Georg Kell, eds. 2010. The United Nations Global Compact: Achievements, Trends and Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Reinecke, Juliane, Stephan Manning, and Olivier Von Hagen. 2012. “The Emergence of a Standards Markets: Multiplicity of Sustainability Standards in the Global Coffee Industry.” Organization Studies 33 (5/6): 791–814.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sasser, Erika N., Aseem Prakash, Benjamin Cashore, and Graeme Auld. 2006. “Direct Targeting as an NGO Political Strategy: Examining Private Authority Regimes in the Forestry Sector.” Business and Politics 8 (3): 1–32.Google Scholar

  • Schepers, Donald H. 2010. “Challenges to Legitimacy at the Forest Stewardship Council.” Journal of Business Ethics 92: 279–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scherer, Andreas Georg and Guido Palazzo. 2007. “Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility: Business and Society seen from a Habermasian Perspective.” Academy of Management Review 32 (4): 1069–1120.Google Scholar

  • Schurman, Rachel. 2004. “Fighting ‘Frankenfoods’: Industry Opportunity Structures and the Efficacy of the Anti-Biotech Movement in Western Europe.” Social Problems 51 (2): 243–268.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shamir, Ronen. 2008. “The Age of Responsibilization: On Market-Embedded Morality.” Economy and Society 37 (1): 1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sharp, Paul F. 1949. “The Tree Farm Movement: Its Origin and Development.” Agricultural History 23: 41–45.Google Scholar

  • Sikavica, Katarina and Jo-Ellen Pozner. 2013. “Paradise Sold: Resource Partitioning and the Organic Movement in the US Farming Industry.” Organization Studies 34 (5–6): 623–651.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tamm Hallström, Kristina and Magnus Boström. 2010. Transnational Multi-Stakeholder Standardization. Organizing Fragile Non-State Authority. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

  • Turcotte, Marie-France, Stéphane de Bellefeuille, and Frank den Hond. 2007. “Gildan Inc.: Influencing Corporate Governance in the Textile Sector.” Journal of Corporate Citizenship 27: 23–36.Google Scholar

  • Tysiachniouk, Maria. 2013. “Fostering Transparency in the Transnational Supply Chain: From Russian Forest Producers to Consumers in Europe and the USA.” Forest Policy and Economics 31 (June): 3–11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Utting, Peter. 2001. Regulating Business via Multi-Stakeholders Initiatives: A Preliminary Assessment. Geneva, Switzerland: UNRISD.Google Scholar

  • Vogel, David. 2008. “Private Global Business Regulation.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1): 261–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Whelan, Glen, Frank G. A. de Bakker, Frank den Hond, and Judy Muthuri. 2013. “Situated Interests: Managing Conflict In and Around Multi-stakeholder Initiatives.” Working Paper. Nottingham: University of Nottingham ICCSR.Google Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Marie-France Turcotte, Département Stratégie, Responsabilité Sociale et Environnementale, École des Sciences de la Gestion, Université du Québec à Montréal, C.P. 6192, succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal (Québec) Canada H3C 4R2, e-mail:


Published Online: 2013-12-12

Published in Print: 2014-04-01


Vogel (2008); Tamm Hallström and Boström (2010).

Fransen (2011); Reinecke, Manning, and Von Hagen (2012).

Gilbert, Rasche, and Waddock (2011: p. 24).

Prakash and Potoski (2007).

Bernstein and Cashore (2007).

E.g., Brunsson, Rasche, and Seidl (2012).

cf. Bartley (2007); Bartley (2011); Fransen (2011).

March and Olsen (1989); Whelan et al. (2013).

Bartley (2007: p. 307).

Bartley (2007).

Manning et al. (2012).

Cashore (2002); Micheletti (2003); McCaffrey and Kurland (2013).

Reinecke, Manning, and Von Hagen (2012).

Sikavica and Pozner (2013).

Mueller, Gomes dos Santos, and Seuring (2009); Jamali (2010).

Mutersbaugh (2005).

Turcotte, Bellefeuille, and den Hond (2007).

Fransen (2011).

Fransen (2011).

Dubuisson-Quellier (2013).

McCarthy and Zald (1977: pp. 1217–1218).

Haack, Schoeneborn, and Wickert (2012: p. 822).

Rasche and Kell (2010).

Meyer (2010).

Overdevest (2010).

Bartley (2007); Fransen (2011).

den Hond et al. (2007).

Bartley (2007: p. 399).

Fransen (2011).

During the 1980s and under increasing pressure for market liberalization by the World Bank, the ICA gradually lost its legitimate role. Its members failed to re-negotiate the agreement in 1989.

Petkova (2006).

<http://www.newforesight.com/sites/default/files/newforesight/TCC_CoffeeBarometer2012.pdf>. Accessed August 2013.

Gendron, Bisaillon, and Otero Rance (2009: p. 64).

Low and Davenport (2005); Gendron, Bisaillon, and Otero Rance (2009).

Conroy (2007).

See <http://sanstandards.org/sitio/nnews/display/10>. Accessed 19 February 2011.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2010).

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2010).

Aoudji et al. (2012); Espinoza, Buehlmann, and Smith (2012).

Aoudji et al. (2012).

See <http://foresthistory.org/About/fhshistory.html>. Accessed 20 March 2013.

Sharp (1949: p. 42).

17 million acres certified in 1949, Sharp (1949).

Sharp (1949: p. 44).

Sharp (1949: pp. 43–44).

See <http://www.treefarmsystem.org>. Accessed 18 March 2013.

Meidinger (2006).

Cashore et al. (2007b).

Meidinger (2006); Cashore et al. (2007b).

Cashore et al. (2007b).

Meidinger (2006).

Meidinger (2006).

Dingwerth and Pattberg (2009).

Meidinger (2006).

Cashore, Auld, and Newsom (2004).

Schepers (2010).

See <http://www.unece.org/forests/docs/rev-98/y-rev98.html>. Accessed August 2013.

Auld and Cashore (2012).

Cashore, Auld, and Newsom (2003: p. 232).

Auld, Gulbrandsen, and McDermott (2008).

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2010).

See <http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2002/09/24/000094946_02090604090781/Rendered/PDF/multi0page.pdf>. Accessed August 2013.

See <http://www.pefc.org/images/stories/documents/Brochures/PEFC_Profile_2012.pdf>. Accessed August 2013.

See <http://fsccanada.org/factsandfigures4.htm#FSCCanICstats>. Accessed 20 March 2011.

Cashore et al. (2007a).

Tysiachniouk (2013).

See <http://www.isealalliance.org/about-us/our-history>. Accessed 4 September 2013.

Overdevest (2010).

See <http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTFORESTS/Resources/FCAG_WB_English.pdf>. Accessed August 2013.

Overdevest (2010).

Hassel (2008); Fransen (2011).

O’Rourke (2004).

Bartley (2007)

See <http://www.wrapapparel.org/en/about-us>.

Bartley (2007: pp. 330–331).

O’Rourke (2004); Fransen (2011).

Sasser et al. (2006).

Fransen (2011).

Fransen (2012).

Turcotte, Bellefeuille, and den Hond (2007).

See <http://www.gscpnet.com/>. Accessed 30 October 2012.

Fransen (2011).

Fransen (2011).

Fransen (2011).

Fransen (2011).

cf. Vogel (2008).

Some attempts in the mid-1990s in the US to develop a collective response by firms in the industry failed to take hold (Bartley 2007: p. 328).

Utting (2001).

AFTS is an exception as it specializes in the management of forestry plantations.

The organic and bird-friendly standards were not part of this process.

Schurman (2004).

Olson (2000).

ETI in the UK, 1998, was the first.

Reinecke, Manning, and Von Hagen (2012).

Shamir (2008).


Citation Information: Business and Politics, ISSN (Online) 1469-3569, ISSN (Print) 1369-5258, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2012-0016.

Export Citation

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in