Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Business and Politics

Editor-in-Chief: Aggarwal, Vinod K.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.384
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.352
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.459

More options …
Volume 17, Issue 3 (Oct 2015)


Structural power and political science in the post-crisis era

Pepper D. Culpepper
Published Online: 2015-08-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2015-0031


This essay highlights productive ways in which scholars have reanimated the concept of structural power to explain puzzles in international and comparative politics. Past comparative scholarship stressed the dependence of the state on holders of capital, but it struggled to reconcile this supposed dependence with the frequent losses of business in political battles. International relation (IR) scholars were attentive to the power of large states, but mainstream IR neglected the ways in which the structure of global capitalism makes large companies international political players in their own right. To promote a unified conversation between international and comparative political economy, structural power is best conceptualized as a set of mutual dependencies between business and the state. A new generation of structural power research is more attentive to how the structure of capitalism creates opportunities for some companies (but not others) vis-à-vis the state, and the ways in which that structure creates leverage for some states (but not others) to play off companies against each other. Future research is likely to put agents – both states and large firms – in the foreground as political actors, rather than showing how the structure of capitalism advantages all business actors in the same way against non-business actors.


  • Abdelal, Rawi. 2015. “The Multinational Firm and Geopolitics: Europe, Russian Energy, and Power.” Business and Politics 17 (3): 553–576.Google Scholar

  • Alfaro, Laura. 2015. “Sovereign Debt Restructuring: Evaluating the Impact of the Argentina Ruling.” Harvard Business Law Review 5 (1): 47–71.Google Scholar

  • Andrews, David. 1994. “Capital Mobility and State Autonomy: Toward a Structural Theory of International Monetary Autonomy.” International Studies Quarterly 38: 193–218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bachrach, Peter, and Morton S. Baratz. 1962. “Two Faces of Power.” American Political Science Review 56 (4): 947–952.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baumgartner, Frank R., Jeffrey M. Berry, Marie Hojnacki, David C. Kimball, and Beth L. Leech. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Bell, Stephen. 2012. “The Power of Ideas: The Ideational Shaping of the Structural Power of Business.” International Studies Quarterly 56: 661–673.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bennett, Andrew, and Jeffrey T. Checkel. 2014. Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Block, Fred. 1980. “Beyond Relative Autonomy: State Managers as Historical Subjects.” The Socialist Register 17: 227–241.Google Scholar

  • Culpepper, Pepper D. 2011. Quiet Politics and Business Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Culpepper, Pepper D. and Raphael Reinke. 2014. “Structural Power and Bank Bailouts in the United Kingdom and the United States.” Politics & Society 42 (4): 427–454.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Emmenegger, Patrick. 2015. “The Long Arm of Justice: U.S. Structural Power and International Banking. ” Business and Politics 17 (3): 473–493.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fairfield, Tasha. 2015a. Private Wealth and Public Revenue in Latin America: Business Power and Tax Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Fairfield, Tasha. 2015b. “Structural Power in Comparative Political Economy: Perspectives from Policy Formulation in Latin America. ” Business and Politics 17 (3): 411–441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Farrell, Henry, and Abraham L. Newman. 2015. “Structuring Power: Business and Authority Beyond the Nation-State. ” Business and Politics 17 (3): 527–552.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. “Global Markets and National Politics.” International Organization 52 (4): 787–824.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gill, Stephen, and David Law. 1989. “Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital. ” International Studies Quarterly 33 (4): 475–499.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hacker, Jacob S. and Paul Pierson. 2002. “Business Power and Social Policy: Employers and the Formation of the American Welfare State.” Politics & Society 30 (2): 277–325.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hacker, Jacob S. and Paul Pierson. 2010. Winner-Take-All Politics. New York, London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

  • Hall, Peter A. 2003. “Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Politics.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, 373–406. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Helleiner, Eric. 2014. The Status Quo Crisis: Global Financial Governance After the 2008 Meltdown. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hindmoor, Andrew, and Josh McGeechan. 2013. “Luck, Systematic Luck and Business Power: Lucky All the Way Down or Trying Hard to Get What It Wants Without Trying?” Political Studies 61 (4): 834–849.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kirshner, Jonathan. 2014. American Power after the Financial Crisis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lindblom, Charles E. 1977. Politics and Markets. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

  • Marsh, David. 1983. “Interest Group Activity and Structural Power: Lindblom’s Politics and Markets.” West European Politics 6 (2): 3–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCarty, Nolan, Keith T. Poole, and Howard Rosenthal. 2013. Political Bubbles: Financial Crises and the Failure of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Miliband, Ralph. 1969. The State in Capitalist Society. London, UK: Quartet Bo.Google Scholar

  • Mosley, Layna. 2000. “Room to Move: International Financial Markets and National Welfare States.” International Organization 54 (4): 737–773.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paster, Thomas. 2015. “Bringing Power Back In: A Review of the Literature on the Role of Business in Welfare State Politics. MPIfG Discussion Paper 15/3.Google Scholar

  • Przeworski, Adam, and Michael Wallerstein. 1988. “Structural Dependence of the State on Capital.” American Political Science Review 82 (1): 11–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reinke, Raphael. 2014. “The Politics of Bank Bailouts.” PhD dissertation, European University Institute.Google Scholar

  • Smith, Mark A. 2000. American Business and Political Power. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Strange, Susan. 1996. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Swank, Duane. 1992. “Politics and the Structural Dependence of the State in Democratic Capitalist Nations.” American Political Science Review 86 (1): 38–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vogel, David. 1987. “Political Science and the Study of Corporate Power: A Dissent from the New Conventional Wisdom.” British Journal of Political Science 17 (4): 385–408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Winecoff, William Kindred. 2015. “Structural Power and the Global Financial Crisis: A Network Analytical Approach. ” Business and Politics 17 (3): 495–525.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Winters, Jeffrey A. 1996. Power in Motion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

  • Young, Kevin. 2012. “Transnational Regulatory Capture?” An Empirical Examination of the Transnational Lobbying of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.” Review of International Political Economy 19 (4): 663–688.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Young, Kevin. 2015. “Not By Structure Alone: Power, Prominence, and Agency in American Finance.” Business and Politics 17 (3): 443–472.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Pepper D. Culpepper, European University Institute, San Domenico, Italy, e-mail:

Published Online: 2015-08-22

Published in Print: 2015-10-01

Citation Information: Business and Politics, ISSN (Online) 1469-3569, ISSN (Print) 1369-5258, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2015-0031.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in