Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Thomas, Douglas D.

Biological Chemistry

Editor-in-Chief: Brüne, Bernhard

Editorial Board Member: Buchner, Johannes / Lei, Ming / Ludwig, Stephan / Sies, Helmut / Turk, Boris / Wittinghofer, Alfred

12 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 3.273

CiteScore 2016: 3.01

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 1.607
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.751

Online
ISSN
1437-4315
See all formats and pricing
In This Section
Volume 383, Issue 3-4 (Apr 2002)

Issues

Role of Endogenous Oxidative DNA Damage in Carcinogenesis: What Can We Learn from Repair-Deficient Mice?

B. Epe
Published Online: 2005-06-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/BC.2002.049

Abstract

Basal steadystate levels of oxidative DNA base modifications such as 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2deoxyguanosine (8-oxoG) are observed in all types of cells, most probably due to a continuous generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the cellular oxygen metabolism, and it has long been suspected that they might play an important role in the initiation of carcinogenesis. Experimental evidence for this assumption can be obtained by studying the effects of a modulation the steadystate levels, either by in or decreasing the generation of oxidative DNA damage, on spontaneous mutation rates and cancer incidence. However, clear answers have not yet been obtained by these strategies. It is still doubtful whether an efficient reduction of the in vivo steadystate levels can achieved by application of antioxidants, and effects observed under oxidative stress conditions (i.e. increased oxidative DNA damage) are inconclusive due to the pronounced epigenetic effects of ROS on signal transduction and gene expression (tumor promotion). In addition, the reliable quantification of the basal levels of oxidative DNA modifications is still major problem. Recently, the generation of mice deficient in the repair 8-oxoG (ogg1/ mice) has opened the door for an alternative approach. Results obtained so far indicate that an increase by less than five 8-oxoG residues per 106 bp in the liver of the knockout animals is associated with a two to threefold higher spontaneous mutation frequency in transgenic genes. However, the increase in the ogg1/ mice of the steadystate level of 8-oxoG and the spontaneous mutation frequency was only observed in the liver and apparently too small to enhance the spontaneous cancer incidence significantly. The limited effect seems to be due to a backup repair system for 8-oxoG in the ogg1/ mice, and it can be expected that the inactivation of this pathway doubleknockout mice will lead to higher effects and a better assessment of the risk associated with endogenous oxidative DNA damage.

About the article

Published Online: 2005-06-01

Published in Print: 2002-04-12



Citation Information: Biological Chemistry, ISSN (Print) 1431-6730, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/BC.2002.049. Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
James P. Kehrer and Lars-Oliver Klotz
Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 2015, Volume 45, Number 9, Page 765
[2]
Watthanachai Jumpathong, Wan Chan, Koli Taghizadeh, I. Ramesh Babu, and Peter C. Dedon
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2015, Volume 112, Number 35, Page E4845
[3]
Federica I. Wolf, Angela Torsello, Beatrice Tedesco, Silvia Fasanella, Alma Boninsegna, Marcello D'Ascenzo, Claudio Grassi, Gian Battista Azzena, and Achille Cittadini
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research, 2005, Volume 1743, Number 1-2, Page 120
[4]
M. Guérard, M. Baum, A. Bitsch, G. Eisenbrand, A. Elhajouji, B. Epe, M. Habermeyer, B. Kaina, H.J. Martus, S. Pfuhler, C. Schmitz, A. Sutter, A.D. Thomas, C. Ziemann, and R. Froetschl
Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research, 2015, Volume 763, Page 181
[5]
Alejandro Canales-Aguirre, Eduardo Padilla-Camberos, Ulises Gómez-Pinedo, Hugo Salado-Ponce, Alfredo Feria-Velasco, and Ruth De Celis
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2011, Volume 8, Number 12, Page 540
[6]
M.P. Kaur, E.J. Guggenheim, C. Pulisciano, S. Akbar, R.M. Kershaw, and N.J. Hodges
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2014, Volume 447, Number 1, Page 12
[7]
Valery V. Khramtsov and Robert J. Gillies
Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, 2014, Volume 21, Number 5, Page 723
[8]
ATHANASIOS VALAVANIDIS, THOMAIS VLACHOGIANNI, and CONSTANTINOS FIOTAKIS
Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part C, 2009, Volume 27, Number 2, Page 120
[9]
Nico Watzek, Nadine Böhm, Julia Feld, Denise Scherbl, Franz Berger, Karl Heinz Merz, Alfonso Lampen, Thorsten Reemtsma, Steven R. Tannenbaum, Paul L. Skipper, Matthias Baum, Elke Richling, and Gerhard Eisenbrand
Chemical Research in Toxicology, 2012, Volume 25, Number 2, Page 381
[10]
Bernd Epe
Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2012, Volume 11, Number 1, Page 98
[11]
Dominique Ziech, Rodrigo Franco, Alexandros G. Georgakilas, Stavroula Georgakila, Vasiliki Malamou-Mitsi, Onard Schoneveld, Aglaia Pappa, and Mihalis I. Panayiotidis
Chemico-Biological Interactions, 2010, Volume 188, Number 2, Page 334
[12]
Thomas B. Kryston, Anastassiya B. Georgiev, Polycarpos Pissis, and Alexandros G. Georgakilas
Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 2011, Volume 711, Number 1-2, Page 193
[13]
Simon Wan Chan and Peter C. Dedon
Journal of Nucleic Acids, 2010, Volume 2010, Page 1
[14]
Mario E. Goetz and Andreas Luch
Cancer Letters, 2008, Volume 266, Number 1, Page 73
[15]
Hermann M Bolt, Heidi Foth, Jan G Hengstler, and Gisela H Degen
Toxicology Letters, 2004, Volume 151, Number 1, Page 29
[16]
Simone Hoffmann-Dörr, Rüdiger Greinert, Beate Volkmer, and Bernd Epe
Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 2005, Volume 572, Number 1-2, Page 142
[17]
Paula V Bennett, Nela S Cintron, Laurent Gros, Jacques Laval, and Betsy M Sutherland
Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 2004, Volume 37, Number 4, Page 488
[18]
Alexander Eckhardt, Nicol Gerstmayr, Karl-Anton Hiller, Carola Bolay, Claudia Waha, Gianrico Spagnuolo, Carlos Camargo, Gottfried Schmalz, and Helmut Schweikl
Biomaterials, 2009, Volume 30, Number 11, Page 2006
[19]
Esha Gollapalle, Rong Wang, Ronke Adetolu, Doug Tsao, Dave Francisco, George Sigounas, and Alexandros G. Georgakilas
Radiation Research, 2007, Volume 167, Number 2, Page 207
[20]
Frank Gaunitz and Kerstin Heise
ASSAY and Drug Development Technologies, 2003, Volume 1, Number 3, Page 469
[21]
J. R. Olliver, L. J. Hardie, S. Dexter, D. Chalmers, and C. P. Wild
Biomarkers, 2003, Volume 8, Number 6, Page 509
[22]
P. Burkovics, I. Hajdu, V. Szukacsov, I. Unk, and L. Haracska
Nucleic Acids Research, 2009, Volume 37, Number 13, Page 4247
[23]
Mohammed MOHSIN ALI, Satofumi KURISU, Yoshihiro YOSHIOKA, Hiroaki TERATO, Yoshihiko OHYAMA, Kihei KUBO, and Hiroshi IDE
Journal of Radiation Research, 2004, Volume 45, Number 2, Page 229
[24]
Environmental Mutagen Research, 2004, Volume 26, Number 1, Page 59
[25]
Giovanni Almadori, Francesco Bussu, Jacopo Galli, Attilio Limongelli, Silvia Persichilli, Bruno Zappacosta, Angelo Minucci, Gaetano Paludetti, and Bruno Giardina
Head & Neck, 2007, Volume 29, Number 7, Page 648
[26]
Guido Frosina
International Journal of Cancer, 2006, Volume 119, Number 1, Page 1
[27]
K. L. EVANS and K. J. GASTON
Functional Ecology, 2005, Volume 19, Number 6, Page 899
[28]
Shiqi Yang, Ayman Koteish, Huizhi Lin, Jiawen Huang, Tania Roskams, Valina Dawson, and Anna Mae Diehl
Hepatology, 2004, Volume 39, Number 2, Page 403

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in