Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Jürges, Hendrik / Ludwig, Sandra

Ed. by Auriol , Emmanuelle / Brunner, Johann / Fleck, Robert / Mendola, Mariapia / Requate, Till / Schirle, Tammy / de Vries, Frans / Zulehner, Christine

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.252
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.755

CiteScore 2016: 0.48

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.330
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.526

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 2, Issue 1 (Jul 2002)


Volume 6 (2006)

Volume 4 (2004)

Volume 2 (2002)

Volume 1 (2001)

Is More for the Poor Less for the Poor? The Politics of Means-Tested Targeting

Jonah B. Gelbach / Lant Pritchett
Published Online: 2002-07-17 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0653.1027


Standard economic analysis suggests that when the budget for redistribution is fixed, income transfers should be targeted to (i.e. means-tested for) those most in need. However, both political scientists and economists long have recognized the possibility that targeting might undermine political support for redistribution. We formalize this recognition, developing a simple economy in which both non-targeted (universally received) and targeted transfers are available for use by the policymaker. When the budget can be taken as fixed, full use of the targeted transfer is optimal. However, when we allow the budget to be determined through majority voting (with the policymaker choosing the share of the budget to be spent on each type of transfer), the optimal degree of targeting is zero. More strikingly, we show that if the policymaker naively ignores political considerations, the resulting equilibrium actually minimizes not only social welfare, but also the welfare of poor and middle income agents. Thus political considerations cannot generally be regarded as simply another “small" extension of standard models. As a result, future models and actual policies advocating the use of targeting through means-testing should account explicitly for the role of political considerations.

Keywords: political economy; targeting; social insurance

About the article

Published Online: 2002-07-17

Citation Information: Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy, ISSN (Online) 1538-0653, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0653.1027.

Export Citation

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Keetie Roelen and Franziska Gassmann
Journal of European Social Policy, 2011, Volume 21, Number 3, Page 238
Esther Schüring and Franziska Gassmann
Development Policy Review, 2016, Volume 34, Number 6, Page 809
Tugrul Gurgur
Economics of Governance, 2016, Volume 17, Number 4, Page 397
Ive Marx, Lina Salanauskaite, and Gerlinde Verbist
Social Forces, 2016, Volume 95, Number 1, Page 1
Peter Lanjouw, Marleen Marra, and Cuong Nguyen
Social Indicators Research, 2017, Volume 133, Number 1, Page 93
Anirudh Krishna
World Development, 2007, Volume 35, Number 11, Page 1947
Chris Elbers, Tomoki Fujii, Peter Lanjouw, Berk Özler, and Wesley Yin
Journal of Development Economics, 2007, Volume 83, Number 1, Page 198
W. Steven Barnett
International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 2010, Volume 4, Number 1, Page 1
Leah Brooks and Maxim Sinitsyn
Housing Policy Debate, 2014, Volume 24, Number 1, Page 119

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in