Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Jürges, Hendrik / Ludwig, Sandra

Ed. by Auriol , Emmanuelle / Brunner, Johann / Fleck, Robert / Mendola, Mariapia / Requate, Till / Schirle, Tammy / de Vries, Frans / Zulehner, Christine

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.252
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.755

CiteScore 2016: 0.48

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.501
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.418

Online
ISSN
1935-1682
See all formats and pricing
In This Section
Volume 2, Issue 1 (Jan 2003)

Issues

Volume 6 (2006)

Volume 4 (2004)

Volume 2 (2002)

Volume 1 (2001)

Suggested Subsidies are Sub-optimal Unless Combined with an Output Tax

Don Fullerton
  • 1University of Texas at Austin,
/ Robert D. Mohr
  • 2University of New Hampshire,
Published Online: 2003-01-31 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0645.1097

Abstract

Because of difficulties measuring pollution, many prior papers suggest a subsidy to some observable method of reducing pollution. We take three such papers as examples, and we extend each of them to show how welfare under the suggested subsidy can be increased by the addition of an output tax. While the suggested subsidy reduces damage per unit of output, it also decreases the firm's cost of production and the equilibrium break-even price. It might therefore increase output – unless combined with an output tax. While this general point has appeared in prior literature, it has been overlooked in specific applications. We illustrate the applicability of a tax-subsidy combination in three very different models of different environmental problems. Using one example, we show that a properly-constructed subsidy-tax combination is equivalent to a Pigovian tax. Another example is a computational model, extended here to show that the policy combination can yield a welfare gain that is more than three times the gain from using the subsidy alone. The third example is a theoretical model, used to show that the subsidy alone increases production and thus could increase total pollution. An additional output tax offsets this increase in production.

This article offers supplementary material which is provided at the end of the article.

Keywords: pollution abatement subsidy; emissions tax; two part instrument

About the article

Published Online: 2003-01-31



Citation Information: Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy, ISSN (Online) 1538-0645, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0645.1097. Export Citation

Supplementary Article Materials

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in