Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Jürges, Hendrik / Ludwig, Sandra

Ed. by Auriol , Emmanuelle / Brunner, Johann / Fleck, Robert / Mendola, Mariapia / Requate, Till / Schirle, Tammy / de Vries, Frans / Zulehner, Christine


IMPACT FACTOR 2015: 0.250
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.825

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.501
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.418
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.455

Online
ISSN
1935-1682
See all formats and pricing

 



Time In Purgatory: Examining the Grant Lag for U.S. Patent Applications

David Popp1 / Ted Juhl2 / Daniel K.N. Johnson3

1Syracuse University,

2University of Kansas,

3Colorado College,

Citation Information: Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy. Volume 4, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 1538-0653, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0653.1329, November 2004

Publication History

Published Online:
2004-11-04

Abstract

As patent applications increase, and the range of patentable technologies increases, the length of time it takes for an invention to go through the examination process at the U.S. Patent Office has increased. Concerns over the distributional effects of these changes have been expressed during policy debates. We use data on U.S. patent applications and grants to ask who is affected by longer grant lags. We augment this analysis with interviews of patent examiners, leading to a better understanding of the examination process. Our analysis finds that differences across technology are most important. These differences do not erode over time, suggesting that learning effects alone will not reduce grant lags. Inventor characteristics have statistically significant effects, but the magnitudes are small.

Keywords: patents; examinations; grant lags; USPTO

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Ryan Lampe and Petra Moser
Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 2015, Page ewv014
[2]
Christopher A. Cotropia, Mark A. Lemley, and Bhaven Sampat
Research Policy, 2013, Volume 42, Number 4, Page 844
[3]
Amitrajeet A. Batabyal and Peter Nijkamp
International Review of Economics & Finance, 2008, Volume 17, Number 1, Page 150
[4]
Amitrajeet A. Batabyal and Gregory J. DeAngelo
International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 2008, Volume 4, Number 1/2, Page 112
[5]
Alfons Palangkaraya, Elizabeth Webster, and Paul H. Jensen
Review of Economics and Statistics, 2011, Volume 93, Number 3, Page 1063
[6]
Aditi Mehta, Marc Rysman, and Tim Simcoe
Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2010, Volume 25, Number 7, Page 1179
[7]
Dirk Czarnitzki, Katrin Hussinger, and Cédric Schneider
The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2012, Volume 37, Number 5, Page 755
[8]
PIERRE RÉGIBEAU and KATHARINE ROCKETT
The Journal of Industrial Economics, 2010, Volume 58, Number 2, Page 222
[9]
SHIFERAW GURMU, GRANT C. BLACK, and PAULA E. STEPHAN
Economic Inquiry, 2010, Volume 48, Number 1, Page 192
[10]
Andrew Eckert and Corinne Langinier
Journal of Economic Surveys, 2014, Volume 28, Number 5, Page 996
[11]
Sebastian Hoenen, Christos Kolympiris, Wilfred Schoenmakers, and Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes
Research Policy, 2014, Volume 43, Number 6, Page 956
[12]
Brian T. McCann and Timothy B. Folta
Journal of Business Venturing, 2011, Volume 26, Number 1, Page 104
[13]
Deli Yang
International Business Review, 2012, Volume 21, Number 4, Page 575
[14]
Ryan Lampe and Petra Moser
The Journal of Economic History, 2010, Volume 70, Number 04, Page 898
[15]
Tugrul Daim, Mitali Monalisa, Pranabesh Dash, and Neil Brown
Foresight, 2007, Volume 9, Number 4, Page 33

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.