Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Jürges, Hendrik

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Ludwig, Sandra / Schmitz, Hendrik

Ed. by Barigozzi, Francesca / Brunner, Johann / Fleck, Robert / Mastrobuoni, Giovanni / Mendola, Mariapia / Requate, Till / de Vries, Frans / Wenzel, Tobias

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.306
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.492

CiteScore 2017: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.414
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.531

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 5, Issue 1


Volume 6 (2006)

Volume 4 (2004)

Volume 2 (2002)

Volume 1 (2001)

Religious Market Structure, Religious Participation, and Outcomes: Is Religion Good for You?

Jonathan H Gruber
Published Online: 2005-09-16 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/1538-0637.1454


Religion plays an important role in the lives of many Americans, but there is relatively little study by economists of the implications of religiosity for economic outcomes. This likely reflects the enormous difficulty inherent in separating the causal effects of religiosity from other factors that are correlated with outcomes. In this paper, I propose a potential solution to this long standing problem, by noting that a major determinant of religious participation is religious market density, or the share of the population in an area which is of an individual’s religion. I make use of the fact that exogenous predictions of market density can be formed based on area ancestral mix. That is, I relate religious participation and economic outcomes to the correlation of the religious preference of one’s own heritage with the religious preference of other heritages that share one’s area. I use the General Social Survey (GSS) to model the impact of market density on church attendance, and micro-data from the 1990 Census to model the impact on economic outcomes. I find that a higher market density leads to a significantly increased level of religious participation, and as well to better outcomes according to several key economic indicators: higher levels of education and income, lower levels of welfare receipt and disability, higher levels of marriage, and lower levels of divorce.

Keywords: religion; religiosity

About the article

Published Online: 2005-09-16

Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, Volume 5, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 1935-1682, ISSN (Print) 2194-6108, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/1538-0637.1454.

Export Citation

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Philipp Ager and Antonio Ciccone
Journal of the European Economic Association, 2018, Volume 16, Number 4, Page 1021
Jacqueline S. Laures-Gore, Penelope Leonard Lambert, Ann Cale Kruger, Jennifer Love, and Don E. Davis
Journal of Religion and Health, 2018
Michael A. Kortt, Todd Steen, and Elisabeth Sinnewe
International Journal of Social Economics, 2017, Volume 44, Number 12, Page 2112
Adrian Chadi and Matthias Krapf
Economic Inquiry, 2017, Volume 55, Number 4, Page 1813
Matteo Migheli
Australian Economic Review, 2016, Volume 49, Number 2, Page 117
Serkan Benk, Tamer Budak, Bahadır Yüzbaşı, and Raihana Mohdali
Religions, 2016, Volume 7, Number 4, Page 37
Richard Patterson and Joseph Price
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 2012, Volume 51, Number 1, Page 79
Jonathan T. Rothwell and Douglas S. Massey
Economic Geography, 2015, Volume 91, Number 1, Page 83

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in