Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Jürges, Hendrik / Ludwig, Sandra

Ed. by Auriol , Emmanuelle / Brunner, Johann / Fleck, Robert / Mendola, Mariapia / Requate, Till / Schirle, Tammy / de Vries, Frans / Zulehner, Christine


IMPACT FACTOR 2015: 0.250
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.825

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.501
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.418
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.455

Online
ISSN
1935-1682
See all formats and pricing

 



30,00 € / $42.00 / £23.00

Get Access to Full Text

Instrument-Induced Bias in Donation Mechanisms: Evidence from the Field

Bailey Norwood1 / Jayson L Lusk2

1Oklahoma State University,

2Oklahoma State University,

Citation Information: Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy. Volume 5, Issue 2, ISSN (Online) 1538-0645, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0645.1413, December 2005

Publication History

Published Online:
2005-12-31

Abstract

Eliciting actual donations toward a public good has been proposed as a means of estimating a lower bound to individuals’ compensating surplus, and can be accomplished using mail/phone surveys or field experiments. This study shows that when warm-glow is present, the elicitation instrument decreases the transaction costs of donating. This presents an obstacle to using the donation mechanism. As a remedy, we propose the use of a multi-donation mechanism where subjects can direct their donation to alternative public goods. Results from a field experiment confirm this instrument-induced bias can be large, suggesting field experiment practitioners should seriously consider how their experimental procedures may alter economic behavior.

Keywords: donations; donation mechanism; nonmarket valuation; warm glow

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.