Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Jürges, Hendrik / Ludwig, Sandra

Ed. by Auriol, Emmanuelle / Brunner, Johann / Fleck, Robert / Mastrobuoni, Giovanni / Mendola, Mariapia / Requate, Till / Schirle, Tammy / de Vries, Frans / Zulehner, Christine

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.306
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.492

CiteScore 2017: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.414
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.531

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 6, Issue 1


Volume 6 (2006)

Volume 4 (2004)

Volume 2 (2002)

Volume 1 (2001)

An Economic Response to Unsolicited Communication

Theodore Loder / Marshall Van Alstyne / Rick Wash
Published Online: 2006-03-04 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0637.1322


If communication involves some transactions cost to both sender and recipient, what policy ensures that correct messages -- those with positive social surplus –- get sent? Filters block messages that harm recipients but benefit senders by more than transactions costs. Taxes can block positive value messages, and allow harmful messages through. In contrast, we propose an ``Attention Bond,'' allowing recipients to define a price that senders must risk to deliver the initial message.The underlying problem is first-contact information asymmetry with negative externalities. Uninformed senders waste recipient attention through message pollution. Requiring attention bonds creates an attention market, effectively applying the Coase Theorem to price this scarce resource. In this market, screening mechanisms shift the burden of message classification from recipients to senders, who know message content. Price signals can also facilitate decentralized two-sided matching. In certain limited cases, this leads to greater welfare than use of even ``perfect'' filters.

This article offers supplementary material which is provided at the end of the article.

Keywords: call externalities; Coase Theorem; spam; filter; information asymmetry; UCE; email communication; advertising; screening; signaling

About the article

Published Online: 2006-03-04

Citation Information: Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy, Volume 6, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 1538-0637, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0637.1322.

Export Citation

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Supplementary Article Materials

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

David W. Boyd
The American Economist, 2012, Volume 57, Number 2, Page 253
Uriel Spiegel and Tchai Tavor
The American Economist, 2011, Volume 56, Number 1, Page 7
Chao-shih Wang and David D. Van Fleet
British Food Journal, 2016, Volume 118, Number 5, Page 1208
Jeffrey K. MacKie-Mason
IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine, 2009, Volume 7, Number 4, Page 80
Benjamin Chiao and Jeffrey MacKie-Mason
Information Economics and Policy, 2012, Volume 24, Number 3-4, Page 173
Oleg V. Pavlov, Robert K. Plice, and Nigel P. Melville
System Dynamics Review, 2008, Volume 24, Number 3, Page 377
B. Curtis Eaton, Ian A. MacDonald, and Laura Meriluoto
Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 2013, Volume 46, Number 3, Page 881
Simon P. Anderson and André de Palma
The RAND Journal of Economics, 2009, Volume 40, Number 4, Page 688

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in