Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Jürges, Hendrik / Ludwig, Sandra

Ed. by Auriol, Emmanuelle / Brunner, Johann / Fleck, Robert / Mastrobuoni, Giovanni / Mendola, Mariapia / Requate, Till / Schirle, Tammy / de Vries, Frans / Zulehner, Christine

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.306
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.492

CiteScore 2017: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.414
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.531

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 9, Issue 3


Volume 6 (2006)

Volume 4 (2004)

Volume 2 (2002)

Volume 1 (2001)

Three Initiatives Enhancing the Mortgage Market and Promoting Financial Stability

Diana Hancock / Wayne Passmore
Published Online: 2009-03-24 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.2226


In recent years, the government has greatly extended its reach into the mortgage markets with the goals of (1) mitigating the deadweight losses associated with mortgage foreclosures, (2) promoting affordable homeownership, and (3) providing low cost mortgage financing. In this paper, we identify three innovations-one in each of these areas-that could be made to the American mortgage market that would help obtain the government's objectives while enhancing financial market stability-particularly if all are done together. These three innovations are: (1) “buy your own mortgage" options, (2) variable maturity mortgages, and (3) creation of a government mortgage bond insurer, with an emphasis on insuring covered bonds as well as GSE debt. The first innovation would allow homebuyers to repurchase their mortgage at the “market value" of their homes when they move, thereby helping society avoid some of the deadweight losses associated with unnecessary foreclosures. The second innovation would provide a mortgage that could promote affordable housing without unduly raising the default risks of low- and moderate-income families. The third innovation would help create a variety of financing options for mortgages in the United States. Moreover, it could be integrated into the current system of mortgage financing, which would include government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), in a manner that would help the government manage the systemic risks associated with the quasi-government backing of mortgage credit and mortgage insurance. In particular, we propose that the government explicitly insure pre-designated financial instruments used to fund mortgage credit (such as covered bonds and GSE debt) by creating a government-backed insurance fund similar to that currently used for deposits.

About the article

Published Online: 2009-03-24

Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, Volume 9, Issue 3, ISSN (Online) 1935-1682, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.2226.

Export Citation

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Jesper Berg and Christian Sinding Bentzen
National Institute Economic Review, 2014, Volume 230, Number 1, Page R58
Kadiri Karamon, Douglas McManus, and Elias Yannopoulos
Journal of Economics and Business, 2016, Volume 84, Page 95
Brent W. Ambrose and Richard J. Buttimer Jr.
Real Estate Economics, 2012, Volume 40, Number 3, Page 536
Ali Nejadmalayeri
Journal of Economics and Business, 2011, Volume 63, Number 5, Page 503

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in