Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Jürges, Hendrik / Ludwig, Sandra

Ed. by Auriol , Emmanuelle / Brunner, Johann / Fleck, Robert / Mendola, Mariapia / Requate, Till / Schirle, Tammy / de Vries, Frans / Zulehner, Christine

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.252
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.755

CiteScore 2016: 0.48

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.330
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.526

Online
ISSN
1935-1682
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 13, Issue 2 (Sep 2013)

Issues

Volume 6 (2006)

Volume 4 (2004)

Volume 2 (2002)

Volume 1 (2001)

The Internet, News Consumption, and Political Attitudes – Evidence for Sweden

Che-Yuan Liang
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Economics, Uppsala Center for Fiscal Studies, Uppsala University, Box 513, SE-75120, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Mattias Nordin
  • Department of Economics, Uppsala Center for Fiscal Studies, Uppsala University, Box 513, SE-75120, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2013-09-20 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2012-0005

Abstract

We investigate the effects of the rise of the Internet as an additional mass medium on news consumption patterns and political attitudes. We use Swedish survey data from 2002 to 2007, the period during which high-speed Internet (broadband) emerged. We find that broadband access is associated with online media consumption. The crowd out of offline consumption is, however, small. Furthermore, these altered news consumption patterns have no or small effects on political attitudes.

Keywords: news; the Internet; political attitudes

References

  • Adermon, A., and C. Liang. 2010. “Piracy, Music, and Movies: A Natural Experiment.” Working Paper 2010:18, Department of Economics, Uppsala University.Google Scholar

  • Bhattacharjee, S., R. Gopal, K. Lertwachara, J. Marsden, and R. Telang. 2007. “The Effect of Digital Sharing Technologies on Music Markets: A Survival Analysis of Albums on Ranking Charts.” Management Science 53:1359–74.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bhuller, M., T. Havnes, E. Leuven, and M. Mogstad. 2013. “Broadband Internet: An Information Superhighway to Sex Crime?” Review of Economic Studies forthcoming. doi:10.1093/restud/rdt013.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Campante, F., R. Durante, and F. Sobbrio. 2013. “Politics 2.0: The Multifaceted Effect of Broadband Internet on Political Participation.” NBER Working Paper 19029.Google Scholar

  • Czernich, N. 2012. “Broadband Internet and Political Participation: Evidence for Germany.” Kyklos 65:31–52.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DellaVigna, S., and E. Kaplan. 2007. “The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 122:1187–234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Enikolopov, R., M. Petrova, and E. Zhuravskaya. 2011. “Media and Political Persuasion: Evidence from Russia.” American Economic Review 101:3253–85.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Falck, O., R. Gold, and S. Heblich. 2012. “E-Lections: Voting Behavior and the Internet.” IZA Discussion Paper 6545.Google Scholar

  • Filistrucchi, L. 2005. “The Impact of Internet on the Market for Daily Newspapers in Italy.” EUI Working Paper ECO 2005:12.Google Scholar

  • Gentzkow, M. 2006. “Television and Voter Turnout.” Quarterly Journal of Economics121:931–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gentzkow, M. 2007. “Valuing New Goods in a Model with Complementarity: Online Newspapers.” American Economic Review 97:713–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gentzkow, M., and J. Shapiro. 2011. “Ideological Segregation Online and Offline.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126:1799–839.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gentzkow, M., J. Shapiro, and M. Sinkinson. 2011. “The Effect of Newspaper Entry and Exit on Electoral Politics.” American Economic Review 101:2980–3018.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • George, L. 2008. “The Internet and the Market for Daily Newspapers.” B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy (Advances) 1:8.Google Scholar

  • George, L., and J. Waldfogel. 2006. “The ‘New York Times’ and the Market for Local Newspapers.” American Economic Review 96:435–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Golde, S., and N. Nie. 2010. “The Effect of Online News on Political Behavior.” Manuscript.Google Scholar

  • Hong, S. 2013. “Measuring the Effect of Napster on Recorded Music Sales: Difference-in-Differences Estimates Under Compositional Changes.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 28:297–324.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kaiser, U. 2006. “Magazines and Their Companion Websites: Competing Outlet Channels?” Review of Marketing Science 1:4.Google Scholar

  • Kaiser, U., and C. Kongstedt. 2012. “Magazine ‘Companion Websites’ and the Demand for Newsstand Sales and Subscriptions.” Journal of Media Economics 25:184–97.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Larcinese, V., and L. Miner. 2012. “The Political Impact of the Internet on US Presidential Elections.” Manuscript.Google Scholar

  • Liebowitz, S. 2007. “How Reliable Is the Oberholzer-Gee/Strumpf Paper on File-Sharing?” CAPRI Publication 06-05, Working Paper.Google Scholar

  • Liebowitz, S. 2008. “Research Note – Testing File Sharing’s Impact on Music Album Sales in Cities.” Management Science 54:852–9.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Liebowitz, S., and A. Zentner. 2012. “Clash of the Titans: Does Internet Use Reduce Television Viewing?.” Review of Economics and Statistics 94:234–45.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Miner, L. 2012. “The Unintended Consequences of Internet Diffusion: Evidence from Malaysia.” Manuscript.Google Scholar

  • Mullainathan, S., and A. Shleifer. 2005. “The Market for News.” American Economic Review 95:1031–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nie, N., D. Miller, S. Golde, D. Butler, and K. Winneg. 2010. “The World Wide Web and the U.S. Political News Market.” American Journal of Political Science 54:428–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oberholzer-Gee, F., and K. Strumpf. 2007. “The Effect of File Sharing on Record Sales: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Political Economy 115:1–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oberholzer-Gee, F., and J. Waldfogel. 2009. “Media Markets and Localism: Does News En Espanõl Boost Hispanic Voter Turnout?” American Economic Review 99:2120–8.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Prat, A., and D. Strömberg. 2005. “Commercial Television and Voter Information.” CEPR Discussion Paper 4989.Google Scholar

  • Prat, A., and D. Strömberg. 2011. “The Political Economy of Mass Media.” CEPR Discussion Paper 8246.Google Scholar

  • Rob, R., and J. Waldfogel. 2006. “Piracy on the High C’s: Music Downloading, Sales Displacement, and Social Welfare in a Sample of College Students.” Journal of Law and Economics 49:29–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Simon, D., and V. Kadiyali. 2007. “The Effect of a Magazine’s Free Digital Content on Its Print Circulation: Cannibalization or Complementarity?” Information Economics and Policy 19:344–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Snyder, J., and D. Strömberg. 2010. “Press Coverage and Political Accountability.” Journal of Political Economy 118:355–408.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Strömberg, D. 2004. “Radio’s Impact on Public Spending.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 119:189–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zentner, A. 2006. “Measuring the Effect of File Sharing on Music Purchases.” Journal of Law and Economics 49:63–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-09-20


There is also an extensive literature on the effects of file-sharing of online music and movies on music and movie sales, most of which find considerable crowd out, e.g. Rob and Waldfogel (2006), Zentner (2006), Bhattacharjee et al. (2007), Liebowitz (2008), Adermon and Liang (2010), and Hong (2013). An exception is Oberholzer-Gee and Strumpf (2007) which do not find any effects (see also the comment by Liebowitz, 2007).

See Mullainathan and Shleifer (2005) for a discussion on how this type of self-selection bias affects the media market.

Miner (2012) and Larcinese and Miner (2012) instead focus on Internet penetration and its effects on voter turnout and voter behavior.

This utility function resembles the specification in Gentzkow (2007), and the ux term allows for any patterns of substitutability and complementarity between the different types of media.

More generally, we cannot identify displacement effects, because there are, as observed in eq. [9], equations, but unknown and unknown , once the reduced-form parameters have been estimated.

Different from this article, broadband availability is typically not measured at the individual level but rather at the municipal or county levels (broadband coverage) which makes a causal interpretation possible. See also Bhuller et al. (2013) who use such an approach to investigate the relationship between broadband coverage and sex-related crimes.

Notably, the outcome variables, such as news consumption, are registered regardless of where they are consumed (at home, work, or any other place).

This variable is not just the sum of the online and offline variables for a given medium, as some individuals consume both the online and the offline versions of that medium.

The average predicted time spent on tabloid consumption is 8.28 min with broadband and 7.66 min without broadband. Similarly, the predicted share reading tabloids (based on the regression results behind column 4 in Table 2) is 0.357 with broadband and 0.299 without broadband. This implies that the predicted average time reading a tabloid, conditional on reading a tabloid at all, is 23.2 min with broadband and 25.6 min without broadband. Broadband access at home, therefore, decreases average time spent reading a tabloid for tabloid consumers by around 2.4 min.


Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, ISSN (Online) 1935-1682, ISSN (Print) 2194-6108, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2012-0005.

Export Citation

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in