Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Jürges, Hendrik / Ludwig, Sandra

Ed. by Auriol , Emmanuelle / Brunner, Johann / Fleck, Robert / Mendola, Mariapia / Requate, Till / Schirle, Tammy / de Vries, Frans / Zulehner, Christine

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.252
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.755

CiteScore 2016: 0.48

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.330
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.526

Online
ISSN
1935-1682
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 13, Issue 2

Issues

Volume 6 (2006)

Volume 4 (2004)

Volume 2 (2002)

Volume 1 (2001)

Opportunities Denied, Wages Diminished: Using Search Theory to Translate Audit-Pair Study Findings into Wage Differentials

Jonathan A. Lanning
Published Online: 2013-08-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2012-0055

Abstract

This article proposes a framework with which to estimate the impact on labor market outcomes implied by audit-pair study findings. I present a search model with discrimination and calibrate the model with experimental data from audit studies of the U.S. labor market and the NLSY79 to estimate the wage and unemployment implications of documented hiring disparity. All simulated results are highly consistent with the hypothesis that hiring discrimination may be an important component of the observed labor market disparity between African American and white workers in the U.S. Additionally, while the simulations only generate a small proportion of the observed gaps in unemployment, it proves to be one of the few models capable of explaining simultaneous wage in unemployment gaps. The most robust finding of the article is that non-trivial wage gaps can result even from the seemingly small differences in hiring rates documented in these studies.

Keywords: labor discrimination; search; audit studies; wage differentials

References

  • Bendic, M. Jr., C. W. Jackson, and V. A. Reinoso. 1994. “Measuring Employment Discrimination through Controlled Experiments.” The Review of Black Political Economy 23(1):25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bertrand, M., and S. Mullainathan. 2003. “Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination,” NBER Working Paper (9873), July 2003.Google Scholar

  • Bertrand, M., and S. Mullainathan. 2004. “Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination.” American Economic Review 94(4):991–1013.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Black, D. A. 1995. “Discrimination in an Equilibrium Search Model.” Journal of Labor Economics 13(2):309–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bollinger, C. R., and A. Chandra. 2005. “Iatrogenic Specification Error: A Cautionary Tale of Cleaning Data.” Journal of Labor Economics 23(2):235–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, C. 1984. “Black-White Earnings Ratios since the Civil Rights Act of 1964: The Importance of Labor Market Dropouts.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 99(1):31–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cash, J., and S. Silverstein. 1969. “A Boy Named Sue,” In Johnny Cash at San Quentin, Columbia Records.Google Scholar

  • Coate, S., and G. C. Loury. 1993. “Will Affirmative-Action Policies Eliminate Negative Stereotypes.” American Economic Review 83(5):1220–40.Google Scholar

  • Darity, W. A., and P. L. Mason. 1998. “Evidence on Discrimination in Employment: Codes of Color, Codes of Gender.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12(2):63–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fix, M., G. C. Galster, and R. J. Struyk. 1993. “An Overview of Auditing for Discrimination.” In Clear and Convincing Evidence: Measurement of Discrimination in America, edited by M. Fix and R. J. Struyk, Chapter 1, 1–68. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar

  • Fryer, R. G., and S. D. Levitt. 2004. “The Causes and Consequences of Distinctively Black Names.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 119(3):767–805.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heckman, J. 1998. “Detecting Discrimination.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12(2):101–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heckman, J. J., and P. Siegelman. 1993. “The Urban Institute Audit Studies: Their Methods and Findings.” In Clear and Convincing Evidence: Measurement of Discrimination in America, edited by F. Michael and R. J. Struyk, 187–276. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar

  • Lahey, J. N. 2008. “Age, Women, and Hiring: An Experimental Study.” Journal of Human Resources 43(1):30–56.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, K. and J. Lehmann. 2012. “Racial Discrimination in the Labor Market: Theory and Empirics.” Journal of Economic Literature 50(4):959–1006.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, K., M. Manove, and W. T. Dickens. 2005. “Racial Discrimination in Labor Markets with Posted Wage Offers.” American Economic Review 95(4):1327–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Neumark, D., R. J. Bank, and K. D. VanNort. 1996. “Sex Discrimination in Restaurant Hiring: An Audit Study.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 111(3):915–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Neumark, D. 2012. “Detecting Discrimination in Audit and Correspondence Studies.” Journal of Human Resources 47(4):1128–57.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Oreopoulos, P. 2011. “Why Do Skilled Immigrants Struggle in the Labor Market? A Field Experiment with Thirteen Thousand Resumes.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 3(4):148–71.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pager, D. 2003. “The Mark of a Criminal Record.” American Journal of Sociology 108(5):937–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Riach, P. A., and J. Rich. 2002. “Field Experiments of Discrimination in the Market Place.” The Economic Journal 112:F480–518.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rooth, D.-O. 2009. “Obesity, Attractiveness, and Differential Treatment in Hiring, a Field Experiment.” Journal of Human Resources 44(3):710–35.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Turner, M. A., M. Fix, and R. J. Struyk. 1991 “Opportunities Denied, Opportunities Diminished,” Urban Institute Report 91-9.Google Scholar

  • Weichselbaumer, D. 2003. “Sexual Orientation Discrimination in Hiring.” Labour Economics 10(6):629–42.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-08-28


Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 921–958, ISSN (Online) 1935-1682, ISSN (Print) 2194-6108, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2012-0055.

Export Citation

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in