Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Ludwig, Sandra / Schmitz, Hendrik

Ed. by Auriol, Emmanuelle / Barigozzi, Francesca / Brunner, Johann / Fleck, Robert / Mastrobuoni, Giovanni / Mendola, Mariapia / Requate, Till / de Vries, Frans / Wenzel, Tobias / Zulehner, Christine

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.306
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.492

CiteScore 2017: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.414
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.531

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 17, Issue 1


Volume 19 (2019)

Volume 6 (2006)

Volume 4 (2004)

Volume 2 (2002)

Volume 1 (2001)

Preferences Toward Leniency under Mandatory Criminal Sentencing Guidelines: Role-in-the-Offense Adjustments for Federal Drug Trafficking Defendants

Andrew W. Nutting
Published Online: 2017-02-07 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2016-0177


This paper tests whether judges and/or prosecutors manipulated mandatory federal sentencing guidelines to shorten prison sentences. It finds that, among drug traffickers convicted under the federal guidelines’ former mandatory sentencing system, those who faced harsher underlying charges were found to have played significantly lower-level roles in their conspiracies. This is consistent with guideline manipulation to help defendants facing longer sentences. Women received significantly larger role-in-the-offense reductions related to harsher underlying charges than men. Effects were insignificant if defendants were eligible for lower-cost alternative methods of sentence reduction, namely substantial assistance departures and safety-valve reductions from mandatory minimum sentences.

Keywords: criminal sentencing; mitigation; gender; drug trafficking


  • Albonetti, Celesta A. 1997. “Sentencing under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: Effects of Defendant Characteristics, Guilty Pleas, and Departures on Sentence Outcomes for Drug Offenses, 1991–1992.” Law & Society Review 31 (3): 789–822.Google Scholar

  • Bjerk, David. 2005. “Making the Crime Fit the Penalty: The Role of Prosecutorial Discretion under Mandatory Minimum Sentencing.” Journal of Law and Economics 48 (2): 591–625.Google Scholar

  • Borjas, George R., Jeffrey Grogger, and Gordon H. Hanson. 2010. “Immigration and the Economic Status of African-American Men.” Economica 77 (306): 255–282. April 2010.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Boylan, Richard T., and Cheryl X. Long. 2005. “Salaries, Plea Rates, and the Career Objectives of Federal Prosecutors.” Journal of Law and Economics 48 (2): 627–651.Google Scholar

  • Fischman, Joshua B., and Max M. Schanzenbach. 2012. “Racial Disparities under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: The Role of Judicial Discretion and Mandatory Minimums.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 9 (4): 729–764.Google Scholar

  • Freeborn, Beth A., and Monica E. Hartmann. 2010. “Judicial Discretion and Sentencing Behavior: Did the Feeney Amendment Rein in District Judges?” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 7 (2): 355–378.Google Scholar

  • Lacasse, Chantale, and A. Abigail Payne. 1999. “Federal Sentencing Guidelines and Mandatory Minimum Sentences: Do Defendants Bargain in the Shadow of the Judge?” Journal of Law and Economics 41 (S1): 245–270.Google Scholar

  • Leipold, Andrew D. 2005. “Why are Federal Judges so Acquittal Prone?” Washington University Law Review 83 (1): 150–227.Google Scholar

  • Mauro, Tony. Supreme Court: Guidelines Advisory, Not Mandatory. Legal Times 2005. January12.

  • Mustard, David B. 2001. “Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. Federal Courts.” Journal of Law and Economics 44 (1): 285–314.Google Scholar

  • Nutting, Andrew W. 2013. “The Booker Decision and Discrimination in Federal Criminal Sentences.” Economic Inquiry 51 (1): 637–652.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Nutting, Andrew W. 2015. “Squealer Dealers: The Market for Information in Federal Drug Trafficking Prosecutions.” Economic Inquiry 53 (1): 486–507.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Schanzenbach, Max M. 2005. “Racial and Sex Disparities in Prison Sentences: The Effect of District-Level Judicial Demographics.” Journal of Legal Studies 32 (2): 57–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schulhofer, Stephen J., and Ilene H. Nagel. 1997. “Plea Negotiations under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.” Northwestern University Law Review 91 (4): 1284–1316.Google Scholar

  • Sorensen, Todd, Supriya Sarnikar, and Ronald L. Oaxaca. 2012. “Race and Gender Differences under Federal Sentencing Guidelines.” American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 102 (3): 256–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Starr, Sonja B., and M. Marit Rehavi. Racial Disparity in Federal Criminal Charging and Its Sentencing Consequences. 2012 University of Michigan Law School, Working Paper No. 12-002.

  • Stith, Kate, and Jose A. Cabranes. 1998. Fear of Judging: Sentencing Guidelines in the Federal Courts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Stith, Kate, and Steve Y. Kuo. 1993. “The Politics of Sentencing Reform: The Legislative History of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.” Wake Forest Law Review 28 : 223–290.Google Scholar

  • Weinstein, Ian. 1999. “Regulating the Market for Snitches.” Buffalo Law Review 47 : 563–632.Google Scholar

  • Weinstein, Jack B. 1992. “A Trial Judge’s Second Impression of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.” Southern California Law Review 66 (1): 357–366.Google Scholar

  • Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-02-07

Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, Volume 17, Issue 1, 20160177, ISSN (Online) 1935-1682, ISSN (Print) 2194-6108, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2016-0177.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in