Abstract
This paper tests whether judges and/or prosecutors manipulated mandatory federal sentencing guidelines to shorten prison sentences. It finds that, among drug traffickers convicted under the federal guidelines’ former mandatory sentencing system, those who faced harsher underlying charges were found to have played significantly lower-level roles in their conspiracies. This is consistent with guideline manipulation to help defendants facing longer sentences. Women received significantly larger role-in-the-offense reductions related to harsher underlying charges than men. Effects were insignificant if defendants were eligible for lower-cost alternative methods of sentence reduction, namely substantial assistance departures and safety-valve reductions from mandatory minimum sentences.
References
Albonetti, Celesta A. 1997. “Sentencing under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: Effects of Defendant Characteristics, Guilty Pleas, and Departures on Sentence Outcomes for Drug Offenses, 1991–1992.” Law & Society Review 31 (3): 789–822.10.2307/3053987Search in Google Scholar
Bjerk, David. 2005. “Making the Crime Fit the Penalty: The Role of Prosecutorial Discretion under Mandatory Minimum Sentencing.” Journal of Law and Economics 48 (2): 591–625.10.1086/429980Search in Google Scholar
Borjas, George R., Jeffrey Grogger, and Gordon H. Hanson. 2010. “Immigration and the Economic Status of African-American Men.” Economica 77 (306): 255–282. April 2010.10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00803.xSearch in Google Scholar
Boylan, Richard T., and Cheryl X. Long. 2005. “Salaries, Plea Rates, and the Career Objectives of Federal Prosecutors.” Journal of Law and Economics 48 (2): 627–651.10.1086/429854Search in Google Scholar
Fischman, Joshua B., and Max M. Schanzenbach. 2012. “Racial Disparities under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: The Role of Judicial Discretion and Mandatory Minimums.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 9 (4): 729–764.10.1111/j.1740-1461.2012.01266.xSearch in Google Scholar
Freeborn, Beth A., and Monica E. Hartmann. 2010. “Judicial Discretion and Sentencing Behavior: Did the Feeney Amendment Rein in District Judges?” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 7 (2): 355–378.10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01181.xSearch in Google Scholar
Lacasse, Chantale, and A. Abigail Payne. 1999. “Federal Sentencing Guidelines and Mandatory Minimum Sentences: Do Defendants Bargain in the Shadow of the Judge?” Journal of Law and Economics 41 (S1): 245–270.10.1086/467425Search in Google Scholar
Leipold, Andrew D. 2005. “Why are Federal Judges so Acquittal Prone?” Washington University Law Review 83 (1): 150–227.Search in Google Scholar
Mauro, Tony. Supreme Court: Guidelines Advisory, Not Mandatory. Legal Times 2005. January12.Search in Google Scholar
Mustard, David B. 2001. “Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. Federal Courts.” Journal of Law and Economics 44 (1): 285–314.10.1086/320276Search in Google Scholar
Nutting, Andrew W. 2013. “The Booker Decision and Discrimination in Federal Criminal Sentences.” Economic Inquiry 51 (1): 637–652.10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00449.xSearch in Google Scholar
Nutting, Andrew W. 2015. “Squealer Dealers: The Market for Information in Federal Drug Trafficking Prosecutions.” Economic Inquiry 53 (1): 486–507.10.1111/ecin.12123Search in Google Scholar
Schanzenbach, Max M. 2005. “Racial and Sex Disparities in Prison Sentences: The Effect of District-Level Judicial Demographics.” Journal of Legal Studies 32 (2): 57–92.10.1086/425597Search in Google Scholar
Schulhofer, Stephen J., and Ilene H. Nagel. 1997. “Plea Negotiations under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.” Northwestern University Law Review 91 (4): 1284–1316.Search in Google Scholar
Sorensen, Todd, Supriya Sarnikar, and Ronald L. Oaxaca. 2012. “Race and Gender Differences under Federal Sentencing Guidelines.” American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 102 (3): 256–260.10.1257/aer.102.3.256Search in Google Scholar
Starr, Sonja B., and M. Marit Rehavi. Racial Disparity in Federal Criminal Charging and Its Sentencing Consequences. 2012 University of Michigan Law School, Working Paper No. 12-002.Search in Google Scholar
Stith, Kate, and Jose A. Cabranes. 1998. Fear of Judging: Sentencing Guidelines in the Federal Courts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Stith, Kate, and Steve Y. Kuo. 1993. “The Politics of Sentencing Reform: The Legislative History of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.” Wake Forest Law Review 28 : 223–290.Search in Google Scholar
Weinstein, Ian. 1999. “Regulating the Market for Snitches.” Buffalo Law Review 47 : 563–632.Search in Google Scholar
Weinstein, Jack B. 1992. “A Trial Judge’s Second Impression of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.” Southern California Law Review 66 (1): 357–366.10.2307/20639495Search in Google Scholar
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Appendix
Note: All ranges are of months imprisonment.
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston