Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Ludwig, Sandra / Schmitz, Hendrik

Ed. by Auriol, Emmanuelle / Barigozzi, Francesca / Brunner, Johann / Fleck, Robert / Mastrobuoni, Giovanni / Mendola, Mariapia / Requate, Till / de Vries, Frans / Wenzel, Tobias / Zulehner, Christine

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.306
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.492

CiteScore 2017: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.414
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.531

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 17, Issue 1


Volume 19 (2019)

Volume 6 (2006)

Volume 4 (2004)

Volume 2 (2002)

Volume 1 (2001)

The Effect of Kinship Placement Laws on Foster Children’s Well-Being

Iryna Hayduk
Published Online: 2017-02-10 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2016-0196


This paper examines whether placing foster children with relatives, instead of unfamiliar caregivers, institutions, or group homes, increases the effectiveness of foster care and consequently improves children’s well-being. As a source of exogenous variation in kinship placement, I use recent major reform of foster care – state policies that prefer kin placement over other types of foster care settings. Using individual-level panel dataset, the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS), and employing difference-in-differences identification strategy, I find that in the short-run children exposed to law benefit from higher stability of placement and shorter length of foster care episode, but do not experience significant changes in either mental or physical health. In the longer term, kinship foster homes are more efficient in terms of improving safety and providing permanent home through discharge from foster care with a relative. Thus, given the effectiveness of kinship care, policymakers should focus on developing and implementing policies that further facilitate relatives’ involvement in foster care.

Keywords: child welfare; foster care; kinship placement; kinship placement law


  • Almond, D., and J. Currie. 2011. “Human Capital Development before Age Five.” In The Handbook of Labor Economics, edited by O Ashenfelter, and D Card, Vol. 4B1315–1486. New York: North Holland.Google Scholar

  • Andersen, S. H., and P. Fallesen. 2015. “Family Matters? the Effect of Kinship Care on Foster Care Disruption Rates.” Child Abuse & Neglect 48 : 68–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Argys, L., and B. Duncan. 2007. “Economic Incentives and Foster Care Placement.” Southern Economic Journal 74 (1): 114–142.Google Scholar

  • Barth, R. 2002. Institutions versus Foster Homes: The Empirical Base for the Second Century of Debate. Chapel Hill, NC: UNC, School of Social Work, Jordan Institute for Families.Google Scholar

  • Berrick, J., R. Barth, and B. Needell. 1994. “A Comparison of Kinship Foster Homes and Foster Family Homes: Implications for Kinship Foster Care as Family Preservation.” Child and Youth Services Review 16 (12): 33–63.Google Scholar

  • Berrick, J., and B. Needell. 1999. “Recent Trends in Kinship Care: Public Policy, Payments, and Outcomes for Children.” In The Foster Care Crisis: Translating Research into Practice and Policy, edited by P.A. Curtis, and G. Dale. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

  • Bertrand, M., E. Duflo, and S. Mullainathan. 2004. “‘How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (1): 249–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brooks, D., and R. Barth. 1998. “Characteristics and Outcomes of Drug-Exposed and Non Drug-Exposed Children in Kinship and Non-Relative Foster Care.” Child and Youth Services Review 20 (6): 475–501.Google Scholar

  • Buckles, K. 2013. “Adoption Subsidies and Placement Outcomes for Children in Foster Care.” Journal of Human Resources 48 (3): 596–627.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chamberlain, P., J. Price, J. Reid, J. Landsverk, P. Fisher, and M. Stoolmiller. 2006. “Who Disrupts from Placement in Foster and Kinship Care?” Child Abuse and Neglect 30 : 409–424.Google Scholar

  • Child Trends Databank. Foster Care 2014, http://www.childtrends.org/?indicators=foster-care.Google Scholar

  • Child Welfare Information Gateway. 2011. Home Study Requirements for Prospective Foster Parents. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau.Google Scholar

  • Child Welfare Information Gateway. 2012. Mandatory Reporters of Child Abuse and Neglect. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau.Google Scholar

  • Child Welfare Information Gateway. 2013. Grounds for Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau.Google Scholar

  • Conway, T., and R. Hutson. 2007. Is Kinship Care Good for Kids?. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy.Google Scholar

  • Cuddeback, G. 2004. “Kinship and Family Foster Care: A Methodological Substantive Synthesis of Research.” Child and Youth Services Review 26 (7): 623–639.Google Scholar

  • Cunha, F., and J. Heckman. 2007. “The Technology of Skill Formation.” American Economic Review 97 (2): 31–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Currie, J., and E. Tekin. 2012. “Understanding the Cycle: Childhood Maltreatment and Future Crime.” Journal of Human Resources 47 (2): 509–549.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Currie, J., and C. Widom. 2010. “Long-Term Consequences of Child Abuse and Neglect on Adult Economic Well-Being.” Child Maltreatment 15 (2): 111–120.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Doyle, J. 2007a. “Can’t Buy Me Love? Subsidizing the Care of Related Children.” Journal of Public Economics 91 (1–2): 281–304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Doyle, J. 2007b. “Child Protection and Child Outcomes: Measuring the Effects of Foster Care.” American Economic Review 97 (5): 1583–1610.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Doyle, J. 2008. “Child Protection and Adult Crime: Using Investigator Assignment to Estimate Causal Effects of Foster Care.” Journal of Political Economy 116 (4): 746–770.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Doyle, J., and E. Peters. 2007. “The Market for Foster Care: An Empirical Study of the Impact of Foster Care Subsidies.” Review of Economics of the Household 5 : 329–351.Google Scholar

  • Ehrle, J., and R. Geen. 2002. “Kin and Non-Kin in Foster Care: Findings from a National Survey.” Child and Youth Services Review 24 (1/2): 15–35.Google Scholar

  • Holtan, A., J. Rnning, B. Handegard, and A. Sourander. 2005. “A Comparison of Mental Health Problems in Kinship and Nonkinship Foster Care.” European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 14 (4): 200–207.Google Scholar

  • Keller, T., K. Wetherbee, N. Le Prohn, V. Payne, K. Sim, and E. Lamont. 2001. “Competencies and Problem Behaviors of Children in Family Foster Care: Variations by Kinship Placement Status and Race.” Child and Youth Services Review 23 (12): 915–940.Google Scholar

  • Koh, E., and M. Testa. 2008. “Propensity Score Matching of Children in Kinship and Non-Kinship Foster Care: Do Permanency Outcomes Still Differ?” Social Work Research 32 : 105–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lindquist, M., and T. Santavirta. 2014. “Does Placing Children in Foster Care Increase Their Adult Criminality?” Labour Economics 31 : 72–83.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • (Miller versus Youakim) (1979).44 U.S. 125, 99 S. Ct. 957.Google Scholar

  • Prior, V., and D. Glaser. 2006. Understanding Attachment and Attachment Disorders: Theory, Evidence and Practice, 248–250. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers Child and Adolescent Mental Health Series.Google Scholar

  • Rubin, D., K. Downes, A. O’Reily, R. McKonnen, X. Luan, and R. Localio. 2008. “Impact of Kinship Care on Behavioral Well-Being for Children in Out-Of-Home Care.” Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine 162 : 550–556.Google Scholar

  • Sacerdote, B. 2002. “The Nature and Nurture of Economic Outcomes.” American Economic Review 92 (2): 344–348.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Santavirta, T. 2012. “How Large are the Effects from Temporary Changes in Family Environment: Evidence from a Child-Evacuation Program during World War II.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 4 (3): 28–42.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Testa, M. 2001. “Kinship Care and Permanency.” Journal of Social Services Research 28 (1): 25–43.Google Scholar

  • (The Annie E. Casey Foundation) (2012).Policy report Stepping up for Kids: What Government and Communities Should Do to Support Kinship Families.Google Scholar

  • Winokur, M., A. Holtan, and D. Valentine. 2009. Kinship Care for the Safety, Permanency, and Well-Being of Children Removed from the Home for Maltreatment Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. doi: CD006546.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-02-10

Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, Volume 17, Issue 1, 20160196, ISSN (Online) 1935-1682, ISSN (Print) 2194-6108, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2016-0196.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in