Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Jürges, Hendrik / Ludwig, Sandra

Ed. by Auriol, Emmanuelle / Brunner, Johann / Fleck, Robert / Mastrobuoni, Giovanni / Mendola, Mariapia / Requate, Till / Schirle, Tammy / de Vries, Frans / Zulehner, Christine

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.306
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.492

CiteScore 2017: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.414
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.531

Online
ISSN
1935-1682
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 17, Issue 2

Issues

Volume 6 (2006)

Volume 4 (2004)

Volume 2 (2002)

Volume 1 (2001)

Banks Restructuring Sonata: How Capital Injection Triggered Labor Force Rejuvenation in Japanese Banks

Takeshi Osada
  • Takeshi Osada, Faculty of Economics and Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Saitama University, Shimookubo 255, Sakura-ku, Saitama, 338-8570 Japan
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Kazuki Onji
  • Corresponding author
  • Graduate School of Economics, Osaka University, 1-7 Machikaneyamacho, Toyonaka, Osaka, 560-0043, Japan
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ David Vera
  • Department of Economics, California State University Fresno, 5245 N. Backer Ave M/S PB20, Fresno, CA 93740-8001, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-05-09 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2016-0059

Abstract

Divergent interests of bank managers and financial regulators potentially compromise the efficacy of bank rescue operations. This study empirically investigates the agency problem encountered in a capital injection program implemented in Japan. We hypothesize that the operations requirement to reduce workforce lead banks to overstate the extent of downsizing by reassigning older workers to bank subsidiaries. We implement a difference-in-differences analysis using a panel of Japanese banks from 1990 to 2010. We also employ propensity score matching to control for sample selection bias. The result shows that injected banks exhibit workforce rejuvenation relative to non-injected banks. Among injected banks, the average employee age falls by approximately 1 year, which is equivalent to a reduction of approximately seventy 65-year-old workers. On an unconsolidated basis, the number of employees in injected banks decreases as a response to the injection. However, on a consolidated basis, which accounts for subsidiary employment, the number of employees does not decrease. Our finding suggests that the Japanese practice of lifetime employment (LTE) survived, albeit in a limited form, among restructured banks.

Keywords: recapitalization program; lifetime employment; Japanese banks

JEL Classification: G21; J40

References

  • Aakvik, Arild. 2001. “Bounding a Matching Estimator: The Case of a Norwegian Training Program.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 63 (1): 115–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Adrian, Tobias, and Hyun-Song Shin. 2009. “Money, Liquidity, and Monetary Policy.” The American Economic Review 99 (2): 600–605.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Autor, David H. 2003. “Outsourcing at Will: The Contribution of Unjust Dismissal Doctrine to the Growth of Employment Outsourcing.” Journal of Labor Economics 21 (1): 1–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Black, Lamont K., and Lieu N. Hazelwood. 2013. “The Effect of TARP on Bank Risk-Taking.” Journal of Financial Stability 9 (4): 790–803.Google Scholar

  • Bresnahan, Timothy F., Erik Brynjolfsson, and Lorin M. Hitt. 2002. “Information Technology, Workplace Organization, and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-Level Evidence.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (1): 339–376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dehejia, Rajeev H., and Sadek Wahba. 1999. “Causal Effects in Nonexperimental Studies: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Training Programs.” Journal of the American statistical Association 94 (448): 1053–1062.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duchin, Ran, and Denis Sosyura. 2014. “Safer Ratios, Riskier Portfolios: Bank’s Response to Government Aid.” Journal of Financial Economics 113 (1): 1–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Flannery, Mark J., and Kristine Watson Hankins. 2013. “Estimating Dynamic Panel Models in Corporate Finance.” Journal of Corporate Finance 19: 1–19.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Genda, Yuji. 2003. “Who Really Lost Jobs in Japan? Youth Employment in an Aging Japanese Society.” In Labor Markets and Firm Benefit Policies in Japan and the United States., edited by Seiritsu Ogura, Toshiaki Tachibanaki, and David A. Wise, 103–134. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Genda, Yuji, and Marcus E. Rebick. 2000. “Japanese Labour in the 1990s: Stability and Stagnation.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 16 (2): 85–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Giannetti, Mariassunta, and Andrei Simonov. 2013. “On the Real Effects of Bank Bailouts: Micro Evidence from Japan.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 5 (1): 135–167.Google Scholar

  • Hollander, Myles, and Douglas A. Wolfe. 1999. NonparametricStatistical Methods., 2nd. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

  • Hoshi, Takeo, and Anil K. Kashyap. 2005. “Solutions to Japan’s Banking Problems: What Might Work and What Definitely will Fail.” In Reviving Japan’s Economy: Problems and Prescriptions., edited by T. Ito, H. Patrick, and D. Weinstein, 147–195. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Hoshi, Takeo, and Anil K. Kashyap. 2010. “Will the US Bank Recapitalization Succeed? Eight Lessons from Japan.” Journal of Financial Economics 97 (3): 398–417.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Judson, Ruth A., and Ann L. Owen. 1999. “Estimating Dynamic Panel Data Models: A Guide for Macroeconomists.” Economics Letters 65 (1): 9–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kambayashi, Ryo, and Takao Kato. 2010. “The Japanese Employment System After the Bubble Burst: New Evidence.” In Japan’s Bubble, Deflation, and Stagnation., edited by K. Hamada, A. Kashyap, and D. Weinstein, 217–262. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Kato, Takao. 2001. “The End of Lifetime Employment in Japan? Evidence from National Surveys and Field Research.” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 15 (4): 489–514.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Keele, Luke. 2010. ““An Overview of Rbounds: An R Package for Rosenbaum Bounds Sensitivity Analysis with Matched Data” White Paper. Columbus OH.” 1–15.Google Scholar

  • Koike, Kazuo. 1996. The Economics of Work in Japan. LTCB International Library Selection. Vol. 3. Tokyo: LTCB International Library Foundation.Google Scholar

  • OECD. OECD Employment Outlook Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1999 Paris.

  • Onji, Kazuki, David Vera, and Jenny Corbett. 2012. “Capital Injection, Restructuring Targets and Personnel Management: The Case of Japanese Regional Banks.” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 26 (4): 495–517.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roodman, David. 2009. “A Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 71 (1): 135–158.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenbaum, Paul R. 2002. Observational Studies., 2nd. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Rubin, Donald B., and Neal Thomas. 2000. “Combining Propensity Score Matching with Additional Adjustments for Prognostic Covariates.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 95 (450): 573–585.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-05-09


Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, Volume 17, Issue 2, 20160059, ISSN (Online) 1935-1682, ISSN (Print) 2194-6108, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2016-0059.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in