Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Jürges, Hendrik / Ludwig, Sandra

Ed. by Auriol, Emmanuelle / Brunner, Johann / Fleck, Robert / Mastrobuoni, Giovanni / Mendola, Mariapia / Requate, Till / de Vries, Frans / Zulehner, Christine

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.306
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.492

CiteScore 2017: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.414
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.531

Online
ISSN
1935-1682
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 18, Issue 4

Issues

Volume 6 (2006)

Volume 4 (2004)

Volume 2 (2002)

Volume 1 (2001)

Marginal Cost of Public Funds: From the Theory to the Empirical Application for the Evaluation of the Efficiency of the Tax-Benefit Systems

Francesco Figari
  • Department of Economics, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy; ISER, University of Essex; CeRP, Collegio Carlo Alberto; DONDENA, Bocconi
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Luca Gandullia / Emanuela Lezzi
Published Online: 2018-09-18 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2018-0132

Abstract

We estimate the marginal cost of public funds (MCF) as an overall indicator of the efficiency of tax-benefit systems and their reforms. The novelty of our work is the calculation of a MCF indicator fully based on empirical micro-data representative of the Italian population. This indicator combines the incentives embodied in the tax-benefit system at the intensive and extensive margins with the respective elasticities of labour supply at both margins. Our results first show the importance of taking into account the heterogeneity of the population with women (both single and in couples) facing a more inefficient system than men. Second, our micro-data based indicator shows the potential bias of MCF indicators based on stylized and hypothetical measures of work incentives.

Keywords: labour supply; marginal welfare cost; microsimulation; tax-benefit system

JEL Classification: H21; H41; H20

References

  • Aaberge, R., and U. Colombino. 2014. “Labour Supply Models,” in Handbook of Microsimulation Modelling. Contributions to Economic Analysis,. edited by C. O’Donoghue, Vol. 293, 167–222. Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar

  • Atkinson, A. B., and N. H. Stern. 1974. “Pigou, Taxation and Public Goods.” Review of Economic Studies 41: 119–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Auerbach, A. J., and H. S. Rosen 1980. “Will the Real Excess Burden Please Stand Up? (Or, Seven Measures in Search of a Concept).” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 495, Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • Auriol, E., and M. Warlters. 2012. “The Marginal Cost of Public Funds and Tax Reform in Africa.” Journal of Development Economics 97 (1): 58‐72.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Ballard, C. L. 1990. “Marginal Welfare Cost Calculations: Differential Analysis Vs. Balanced-Budget Analysis.” Journal of Public Economics 41: 263–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ballard, C. L., and D. Fullerton. 1992. “Distortionary Taxes and the Provision of Public Goods.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 6: 117–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ballard, C. L., J. B. Shoven, and J. Whalley. 1985. “General Equilibrium Computations of the Marginal Welfare Costs of Taxes in the United States.” The American Economic Review 75 (1): 128‐138.Google Scholar

  • Bargain, O., K. Orsini, and A. Peichl. 2014. “Comparing Labour Supply Elasticities in Europe and the US: New Results.” Journal of Human Resources 49 (3): 723–838.Google Scholar

  • Barrios, S., J. Pycroft, and B. Saveyn. (2013).Fiscal Policy and Growth, No. 13, Bank of Italy, Rome The Marginal Cost of Public Funds in the EU: The Case of Labour versus Green Taxes.Google Scholar

  • Bjertnæs, G. H. (2018).Working paper No. 879Statistics Norway Research Department The Marginal Cost of Public Funds in Large Welfare State Countries.Google Scholar

  • Blundell, R., A. Duncan, J. McCrae, and C. Meghir. 2000. “The Labour Market Impact of the Working Families’ Tax Credit.” Fiscal Studies 21 (1): 75–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blundell, R. W., and T. MaCurdy. 1999. “Labor Supply: A Review of Alternative Approaches.” In Handbook of Labour Economics, edited by O. Ashenfelter and D. Card, Vol. 3A. ElsevierScience B.V.: Amsterdam.Google Scholar

  • Browning, E. K. 1976 . “The Marginal Cost of Public Funds.” The Journal of Political Economy 84 (2): 283– 98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Browning, E. K. 1987. “On the Marginal Welfare Cost of Taxation.” The American Economic Review 77: 11–23.Google Scholar

  • Callan, T., A. Van Soest, and J. R. Walsh. 2009. “Tax Structure and Female Labour Supply: Evidence from Ireland.” Labour 23 (1): 1–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Creedy, J., and G. Kalb. 2005. “Discrete Hours Labour Supply Modelling: Specification, Estimation and Simulation.” Journal of Economic Surveys 19 (5): 697–734.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dahlby, B. 1998. “Progressive Taxation and the Social Marginal Cost of Public Funds.” Journal of Public Economics 67 (1): 105–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dahlby, B. 2008. The Marginal Cost of Public Funds. Theory and Applications. M.I.T. Press: Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

  • Dahlby, B., and E. Ferede. 2012. “The Effects of Tax Rate Changes on Tax Bases and the Marginal Cost of Public Funds for Canadian Provincial Governments.” International Tax and Public Finance 19: 844–83.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Decoster, A., S. Perelman, D. Vandelannoote, T. Vanheukelom, and G. Verbist. 2015. “A Bird’s Eye View on 20 Years of Tax-Benefit Reforms in Belgium.” EUROMOD Working Paper Series, EM 10/15, JuneGoogle Scholar

  • Dixon, P., J. Honkatukia, and M. Rimmer. "The Marginal Cost of Funds from Different Taxes in Finland", GTAP #Resource3877 2012, https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/res_display.asp?RecordID=3877.

  • Figari, F., and C. Fiorio. 2015. “Fiscal Consolidation Policies in the Context of Italy’s Two Recessions.” Fiscal Studies 36 (4): 499–526.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Figari, F., A. Paulus, and H. Sutherland. 2015. “Microsimulation and Policy Analysis,” in Handbook of Income Distribution, edited by A.B. Atkinson, and F. Bourguignon,,, 2141–221. Oxford: Elsevier: North HollandGoogle Scholar

  • Hansson, I. 1984. Marginal Cost of Public Funds for Different Tax Instruments and Government Expenditures. In Limits and Problems of Taxation. 17–32. Palgrave Macmillan: UK.Google Scholar

  • Hansson, I., and C. Stuart. 1985. “Tax Revenue and the Marginal Cost of Public Funds in Sweden.” Journal of Public Economics 27 (3): 331–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harberger, A. C. 1964. “The Measurement of Waste.” The American Economic Review 54: 58–76.Google Scholar

  • Heckman, J. J. 1993. “What Has Been Learned about Labour Supply in the past Twenty Years?.” The American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 83: 116–21.Google Scholar

  • Immervoll, H., H. J. Kleven, C. T. Kreiner, and E. Saez. 2007. “Welfare Reform in European Countries: A Microsimulation Analysis.” The Economic Journal 117: 1–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Immervoll, H. 2004. EUROMOD Working Paper Series, No. EM6/04 Average and Marginal Effective Tax Rates Facing Workers in the EU: A Micro-Level Analysis of Levels, Distributions and Driving Factors.Google Scholar

  • Jara, H. X., K. Gasior, and M. Makovec. 2017. EUROMOD Working Paper Series, EM 3/17. Low Incentives to Work at the Extensive and Intensive Margin in Selected EU Countries.Google Scholar

  • Jara, H. X., and A Tumino. 2013. “Tax-Benefit Systems, Income Distribution and Work Incentives in the European Union.” International Journal of Microsimulation 6 (1): 27–62.Google Scholar

  • Kleven, H. J., and C. T. Kreiner. 2006. “The Marginal Cost of Public Funds: Hours of Work versus Labour Force Participation.” Journal of Public Economics 90 (10): 1955–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mayshar, J. 1991. “On Measuring the Marginal Cost of Funds Analytically.” The American Economic Review 81: 1329–35.Google Scholar

  • McFadden, D. 1974. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behaviour.” In Frontiers in Econometrics, edited by P. Zerembka, New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar

  • O’Donoghue, C. 2011. “Do Tax-Benefit Systems Cause High Replacement Rates? A Decompositional Analysis Using EUROMOD.” Labour 25 (1): 126–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paulus, A., F. Figari, and H. Sutherland. 2017. “The Design of Fiscal Consolidation Measures in the European Union: Distributional Effects and Implications for Macro-Economic Recovery.” Oxford Economic Papers 69 (3): 632–54.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Pigou, A.C. 1947. A Study in Public Finance, 3rd ed. Macmillan: London.Google Scholar

  • Samuelson, P.A. 1954. “The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure.” Review of Economics and Statistics 36 (4): 387–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sandmo, A. 1998. “Redistribution and the Marginal Cost of Public Funds.” Journal of Public Economics 70 (3): 365–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stiglitz, J. E., and P. Dasgupta. 1971. “Differential Taxation, Public Goods and Economic Efficiency.” Review of Economic Studies 38: 151–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stuart, C. 1984. “Welfare Costs per Dollar of Additional Tax Revenue in United States.” The American Economic Review 74: 352–62.Google Scholar

  • Sutherland, H., and F. Figari. 2013. “EUROMOD: The European Union Tax-Benefit Microsimulation Model.” International Journal of Microsimulation 6 (1): 4–26.Google Scholar

  • Thomas, A., and P. O’Reilly 2016. “The Impact of Tax and Benefit Systems on the Workforce Participation Incentives of Women.” OECD Taxation Working Papers, No. 29, OECD Publishing, Paris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Usher, D. 1984. “An Instructive Derivation of the Expression for the Marginal Cost of Public Funds.” Public Finance 39 (3): 406–11.Google Scholar

  • Van Soest, A. 1995. “Structural Models of Family Labour Supply. A Discrete Choice Approach.” The Journal of Human Resources 30: 63–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wildasin, D.E. 1984. “On Public Good Provision with Distortionary Taxation.” Economic Inquiry 32: 227–43.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-09-18


Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, Volume 18, Issue 4, 20180132, ISSN (Online) 1935-1682, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2018-0132.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in